Late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is seen here, pre-scandal, at left, in conversation with Alan Dershowitz, at a Cambridge event. Harvard received gifts totaling nearly $9 million from Epstein between 1998 and 2007, before he was convicted in 2008 for crimes involving girls and young women. South Florida CEOs were asked: “We recently asked what an organization like Harvard, which received donations from Jeffrey Epstein, should do with said donations. Do organizations have an obligation, or a responsibility, to return funds received from individuals who proved to be criminals, or whose reputations have been severely damaged?”
CEOs were asked: We recently asked what an organization like Harvard, which received donations from Jeffrey Epstein, should do with said donations. Do organizations have an obligation, or a responsibility, to return funds received from individuals who proved to be criminals, or whose reputations have been severely damaged?
Every organization is different, and in situations like this, leadership needs to look at their charity’s mission and values. If the donations go against their values, no matter how in need an organization is, the money should be returned. Another option is to give the funds to the people affected by the criminal’s actions.
Tony Argiz, chairman, CEO, Morrison, Brown, Argiz & Farra, LLC (MBAF)
I don’t think they should return it, but I do think they should use the money to support programs that support the students — on campus medical, suicide hotlines, Al Anon meetings, security.
Jennifer Cramer, CEO, co-founder, The Spice Lab
In such cases, organizations should consider the ethical responsibility to do what’s right by the victims and their families, whether that’s returning the money or donating it to a charitable cause or a relief fund that benefits survivors. The victims’ welfare and recovery should be considered as a top priority.
Adriana Jaegerman, senior principal, managing leader, Stantec
A donation received from someone who is subsequently convicted of drug trafficking or any other profit-generating criminal activity is obviously tainted; in contrast, a donation made by someone subsequently convicted of another crime unrelated to criminal profiteering, e.g., a sexual predator, is a more difficult question. When such a situation arises, an organization needs to first publicly acknowledge the issue and then transparently discuss options with its leaders, members, and outside stakeholders.
José E. Latour, founding partner, LatourLaw
Each situation is different and whether funds should be returned to a donor whose reputation might be tarnished should be determined on a case by case basis. If there is a way to have an immediate impact, to address a social ill or provide an opportunity to the underserved that can be agreed to by all stakeholders, then the organization may want to weigh how they can do the most good with the funds that have been gifted by an individual that is considered “tarnished”. In the case of Jeffery Epstein, who is dead, would the organization return the funds to his trust? There is no simple solution.
Beatrice Louissaint, president, CEO, Florida State Minority Supplier Development Council
University gift agreements often include a clause that enables the naming of a building or professorship to be rescinded if there is a scandal. However, universities very rarely return money. The Epstein case may prove different because there are identifiable living victims who could benefit from the tainted donations. Harvard’s lawyers will probably not want to open Pandora’s Box; conceding in the Epstein case could spawn a rash of claims against other donations.
John Quelch, vice provost, University of Miami Dean, Miami Business School and Leonard M. Miller University Professor
There are numerous dimensions to an institution’s obligations under the circumstances. There may, for one, be legal obligations. Organizations often have formal agreements for large gifts, whether restricted or unrestricted. In order to mitigate an organization’s reputational damage from being associated with a discredited person or company, it is critical for those gift agreements to provide for revocation of naming rights in the event of illegal or otherwise inappropriate behavior by a donor.
Whether there is a moral obligation to return a gift is a situation-specific inquiry requiring sound judgment by the organization’s board. If the gift derived from harmful activity (e.g., human trafficking or proliferation of opioids), instead of returning the funds, the board might instead re-gift them to an organization that seeks to remedy that particular harm. If the funds derive from legal activity or inherited wealth, the moral considerations aren’t nearly as compelling.
Finally, the organization must consider whether it can financially afford to forego the gift. For most organizations, the Board must consider the financial harm to be caused by the return of a gift.
Chana Sheldon, executive director, MOCA
THE MIAMI HERALD CEO ROUNDTABLE IS A WEEKLY FEATURE THAT APPEARS IN BUSINESS MONDAY OF THE MIAMI HERALD. Meet the current members of the roundtable.
RECENT QUESTIONS TO THE ROUNDTABLE HAVE INCLUDED:
▪ CEOs moving forward, not scaling back
▪ Sharing office space? It’s a good idea for some
▪ Jobs available, but finding qualified candidates is a hurdle for some
▪ Recession? CEOs say that so far, it’s a no-show in South Florida
▪ Traveler’s checkup: CEOs discuss pros and cons of liberal vacation policies
▪ Too cold? Too hot? Let’s talk workplace temperatures
▪ CEOS: Working remotely is often a great alternative
▪ If the economy falters, local companies are prepared
▪ CEOs consider whether Miami is the ideal spot for a soccer team and stadium
▪ CEOs are planning for climate change and sea-level rise
▪ Efforts to boost low wages may ease affordability crisis
▪ Local and state governments must do more to address affordable housing
▪ Find your passion and own your career path, CEOS tell job seekers
▪ Here’s how CEOs would advise a high school senior class on its last day
▪ South Florida CEOs offer suggestion to address America’s student loan debt
▪ Supervisors often were the greatest influence on CEOs’ careers
▪ CEOs address Miami’s racial wealth gap
▪ CEOs discuss transforming healthcare in America
▪ Is the job market as good as it gets?
▪ CEOs split on encouraging marijuana sales in Florida
▪ Unlocking state funds for affordable housing is the right move, CEOS said
▪ CEOs try to lasso healthcare costs, but more needs to be done
▪ CEOs agree that tax breaks are needed to lure businesses to Florida
▪ Technology led to significant changes in 2018 for most CEOs
▪ What are CEOs doing to attract and retain workers?
▪ Most CEOs say salaries will increase in 2019
▪ Most CEOs are in ‘growth mode’ with plans to hire more
▪ CEOs’ 2019 economic forecast offers differing views
▪ How CEOs are trying to attract ‘Generation Z’
▪ Most CEOs say PortMiami should expand more, without hurting the fragile eco-system
▪ Should financial institutions reach more ‘unbanked’ people?
▪ Tech scene throughout South Florida is building momentum
▪ CEOs discuss their top workforce challenges for 2019
▪ The best gift? Even for the most successful people, life is about more than business
▪ Recession ahead? CEOs divided on whether they see signs of one
▪ CEOs: Amazon’s strong look at Miami for HQ2 made the region look hard at itself
▪ Biggest influence on CEOs’ careers? Most say it was a parent
▪ Jobs available? CEOs look at their companies
▪ CEOs keep an eye on Miami’s cost of living
▪ The key to retaining employees? Start with good pay and benefits
▪ Live-work-play? More employees opt to live closer to workplaces
▪ Some CEOs say they’ve raised wages this year
▪ Here are some issues CEOs hope lawmakers keep top-of-mind this election year
▪ CEOs offer varying opinions on higher education
▪ Local firms are doing their part to be more eco-friendly
▪ CEOs are all smiles thanks to local economic boom
▪ Is work-life balance a myth? CEOs share their thoughts
▪ CEOs help employees stsruggling with long commutes
▪ Despite airline woes, CEOs are not changing traveling habits
▪ CEOs have diverse opinions on Trump’s tariffs and other actions
▪ CEOs feel pressure to keep wages competitive
▪ South Florida CEOs say that Miami can sustain David Beckham’s soccer team
▪ CEOs hope common-sense control on assault rifles happens soon
▪ Will Amazon open HQ2 in Miami? Maybe, maybe not, but city’s profile rises, CEOs say
▪ We have much to learn about public transit from other cities, CEOs say
▪ CEOs: Cuban coffee, flexibility and beach picnics help employees balance job demands
▪ CEOs discuss how to deal with extreme views in the workplace
▪ Extra guards, added security measures protect staff and clients
▪ As automation advances, CEOs say humans are still needed
▪ Holiday parties celebrate employees and the year’s successes
▪ These CEOs have zero tolerance for sexual harassment
▪ Will automation change your job? Yes — and no, CEOs say
▪ How CEOs address hostility in the workplace
▪ Good storm planning can stave off disruptions, CEOs find
▪ Storms highlighted serious local issues, CEOs say
▪ Planning, preparation are keys to disaster recovery, CEOs say
▪ CEOs say students who improve certain skills are better prepared for future jobs
▪ Uncertainty about the Affordable Care Act on the minds of CEOs
▪ In a year of challenges, CEOs took risks, learned and grew
▪ CEOs believe community should be involved in making public schools better
▪ Best bosses we ever had inspired, challenged and cared, say South Florida CEOs
▪ South Florida CEOs try to evaluate the nation’s top CEO: President Trump
▪ CEOs’ advice to college students: Network! Internships! Research!
▪ Affordable housing a cause of concern for CEOs
▪ Communication, cool heads key to avoiding public relations nightmares
▪ Meet the new Miami Herald CEO Roundtable
▪ Ahh, the first job. CEOs learned valuable lessons on the bottom rung
▪ It’s getting harder for employees and CEOs to disconnect while on vacation
▪ Florida’s legislators must act on economy and education, CEOs say
▪ Most CEOs provide paid internships, and everyone benefits
▪ Local firms rich in generational immigrants, CEO say, but deportation efforts worry some
▪ Long hours at the office? CEOs say how they avoid burnout
▪ CEOs prefer balance when dealing with a defiant employee
▪ The most important issue facing South Florida this year? CEOs say it’s traffic
▪ Have you been to Cuba? CEOs discuss business and travel opportunities on the island
▪ CEOs discuss their resolutions for the New Year
▪ CEOs: Trump, ugly politics among the biggest surprises of 2016
▪ CEOs’ top request for Trump’s first 100 days: ‘Unity’
▪ CEOs won’t tolerate ugly comments in the workplace
▪ CEOs assess South Florida’s economy for 2017
▪ Did Obamacare hurt your business? South Florida CEOs respond