Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

Parkland shooter drew swastikas and used racial slurs. This has become all too common | Editorial

As the sentencing trial for the confessed Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooter continues, jurors learned of his use of racial slurs and drawing of swastikas. (Amy Beth Bennett/South Florida Sun Sentinel via AP, Pool)
As the sentencing trial for the confessed Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooter continues, jurors learned of his use of racial slurs and drawing of swastikas. (Amy Beth Bennett/South Florida Sun Sentinel via AP, Pool) South Florida Sun Sentinel

What makes troubled and deeply disturbed teenage boys like Nikolas Cruz so enamored by Nazi symbols and prone to racial and gender hate?

As the Parkland shooter’s sentencing trial uncovers chilling details about his life, including a history of skinning lizards alive as a child, jurors recently got a further look at his troubled mind. Cruz drew swastikas on the magazines found in the AR-15-style semiautomatic rifle he used in the massacre and on one of his boots, Broward County Sheriff’s Office investigators testified. He made online searches on how to buy Nazi flags and about Adolf Hitler’s birthday. He posted comments using a racial slur. He also wrote that, “Women are less important than a dog,” the Associated Press reported.

Prosecutors aren’t making the case that the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School was motivated by racial or gender animosity. They are trying to convince jurors Cruz was driven by antisocial personality disorder and not fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, as the defense contends. But the surfacing of white supremacy and misogyny in his trial isn’t surprising. Even if they didn’t drive Cruz to act, it’s further proof that hatred is very much alive, and young white men seem especially prone to subscribing to it.

Hitler celebrated

Cruz is hardly the first mass shooter to espouse such heinous views. The Columbine shooters, for example, referred often to “4-20,” Hitler’s birthday and the day in 1999 that the massacre occurred.

In Buffalo, authorities have said an 18-year-old targeted a grocery store in a Black neighborhood, killing 10 people, because he wanted to prevent Black people from replacing white people. In Charleston, a 21-year-old white supremacist opened fire during Bible study at a historic Black church in 2015, killing nine. In El Paso, the man accused of killing 23 shoppers at a Walmart in 2019 told authorities he targeted Hispanics and reportedly posted a diatribe online railing against immigration. In Pittsburgh, a man is about to go to trial for the 2018 killing of 11 worshipers at a synagogue. His social-media history included posts about a conspiracy theory that the Holocaust was a hoax.

Most recently, in California, a 25-year-old and self-declared “incel” — an online community of men who call themselves “involuntary celibates” and express anger against women — was arrested for violent attacks against women. He posted videos online of himself pepper spraying and harassing them.

Perhaps young, lonely white men with mental-health issues use women and racial minorities as scapegoats for their own marginalization. Perhaps they have found online a validation of feelings they couldn’t express in real life without rebuke. Regardless, white supremacy and gender-related hatred represent a danger to America. Long gone are the days when white supremacists met in dingy basements and wore white robes. With easy access to guns, white supremacy can more easily turn from online rants to real acts of violence.

Social media culpable

Much responsibility falls on online platforms where anything goes, like 8chan, where authorities say the El Paso shooter posted his manifesto. We cannot let Facebook and mainstream social-media platforms off the hook for their failure to prevent misinformation. At the same time, when Facebook and others remove hateful content and those who advance it, they are often accused of censorship, mainly by Republicans. Florida lawmakers passed a law that would’ve fined platforms for removing political candidates, but a district judge ruled it is unconstitutional. A similar Texas law, however, was upheld, and Gov. Ron DeSantis now wants to take the issue to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Anti-Defamation League has counted 450 murders committed by political extremists in the United States in the past decade. Most of those crimes were committed by right-wing extremists with nearly half of those by white supremacists. Mass shootings were the main factor behind high murder totals. Another ADL report released this month found Florida has seen a dramatic rise in anti-Semitic incidents — a 50% increase in 2021 compared to the previous year — and other hate crimes. Our state leaders have been mum on this issue. Meanwhile, obscure groups like the White Lives Matter network feel emboldened to fly Nazi flags over interstate overpasses and publicly display their nefarious beliefs.

Perhaps we will never fully understand what drives mass shooters to commit such heinous acts of violence. But we would be foolish to ignore the increasing appeal that white supremacy and misogyny have to young men. We must wonder how many of them are on the verge of snapping. It only takes them one visit to a gun store for that to happen.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

What's an editorial?

Editorials are opinion pieces that reflect the views of the Miami Herald Editorial Board, a group of opinion journalists that operates separately from the Miami Herald newsroom. Miami Herald Editorial Board members are: opinion editor Amy Driscoll and editorial writers Isadora Rangel and Mary Anna Mancuso. Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.

What's the difference between an op-ed and a column?

Op-Eds, short for “opposite the editorial page,” are opinion pieces written by contributors who are not affiliated with our Editorial Board.

Columns are recurring opinion pieces that represent the views of staff columnists that regularly appear on the op-ed page.

How does the Miami Herald Editorial Board decide what to write about?

The Editorial Board, made up of experienced opinion journalists, primarily addresses local and state issues that affect South Florida residents. Each board member has an area of focus, such as education, COVID or local government policy. Board members meet daily and bring up an array of topics for discussion. Once a topic is fully discussed, board members will further report the issue, interviewing stakeholders and others involved and affected, so that the board can present the most informed opinion possible. We strive to provide our community with thought leadership that advocates for policies and priorities that strengthen our communities. Our editorials promote social justice, fairness in economic, educational and social opportunities and an end to systemic racism and inequality. The Editorial Board is separate from the reporters and editors of the Miami Herald newsroom.

How can I contribute to the Miami Herald Opinion section?

The Editorial Board accepts op-ed submissions of 650-700 words from community members who want to argue a specific viewpoint or idea that is relevant to our area. You can email an op-ed submission to oped@miamiherald.com. We also accept 150-word letters to the editor from readers who want to offer their points of view on current issues. For more information on how to submit a letter, go here.

This story was originally published September 30, 2022 at 8:15 AM.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER