Op-Ed

Capitalist? Socialist? Democrats need to figure out what they are — and aren’t | Opinion

Bernie Sanders says that he is a democratic socialist, while Elizabeth Warren says she is a capitalist. However, President Trump has branded the candidates socialists.
Bernie Sanders says that he is a democratic socialist, while Elizabeth Warren says she is a capitalist. However, President Trump has branded the candidates socialists.

College professors spend a lot of time distinguishing different theories and points of view within disciplines, choosing their language carefully to distinguish the different camps, defending some and criticizing others.

Politics, interestingly, is similar. Candidates and political parties invest enormous amounts of resources and time defining which candidates and positions they support and which they oppose. They go out of their way to tar the other side with labels and concepts they find negative and to define themselves through ideas they think beneficial.

The use of the terms “capitalism” and “socialism” among Democratic candidates for president is in need of an intervention by some political philosophers and political scientists. The way Democrats are defining themselves is leading to confusion among voters — and giving President Trump and the Republican Party ample opposition material.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, for example, repeatedly has said that she is “a capitalist,” and Sen. Bernie Sanders has repeatedly claimed to be a “democratic socialist.” These two candidates for the Democratic nomination are as similar as any two candidates running, yet they characterize themselves as economic opponents.

Warren and Sanders both blast the existing economic order, calling for many similar changes: major new taxes on the rich, Medicare for all, free college tuition, new regulations on business and more.

The truth is that Warren is not a capitalist in any interesting sense of the term, and Sanders is not a democratic socialist in any interesting sense of the term. Both are strong proponents of the “mixed economy” or “social democracy” — terms often used interchangeably by political philosophers, political scientists and economists to refer to those political-economic systems that are a blend of capitalism and socialism.

The New Deal and The Great Society — and the progressive era, for that matter — transported the United States from laissez-faire capitalism toward the mixed economy. We stopped short of the kinds of social democracies associated with the Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway).

But our mixed economy and the social democracies were never socialist. The defining feature of socialism has always been “the means of production are publicly owned.” After World War II, the United Kingdom and France, for example, shifted toward democratic socialism in many ways because major industries (like utilities) were nationalized.

But our mixed economy still sits in between traditional laissez-faire capitalism and the social democracies.

Warren should stop saying that she is a capitalist because this is misleading. She is either a mixed-economy theorist or a social democrat. Sanders, who admittedly has called himself a democratic socialist for years, is nevertheless not one. He is a social democrat.

As things stand now, Trump and the Republicans are calling all Democrats “socialists,” and this is not in the best interests of any of the Democrats running for president — certainly not Joe Biden, Kamala Harris or Cory Booker.

How you define yourself and how others define you is of fundamental importance in academics and in politics. The Democratic Party would do well to put more academics into their politics, and study up on the past. Some Political Philosophy 101 might help them take back the White House.

Dave Anderson taught ethics and politics at George Washington University for 12 years and is the editor of “Leveraging”

(c) 2019 The Baltimore Sun

  Comments