Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

Biannual time change must end, but Floridians may not like the best alternative | Opinion

Daylight Saving Time started Sunday, to the chagrin of many Americans.
Daylight Saving Time started Sunday, to the chagrin of many Americans. Miami Herald File

If you woke up cranky and sleep-deprived on Monday, you must know that the antiquated practice of time change needs to end in the U.S. On Sunday, we were forced once again to “spring forward” and set our clocks forward an hour to observe Daylight Saving Time.

There are a lot of people across the political spectrum who agree we should stick to one time and end the biannual clock changes. That’s good. The question is how.

This may not be a popular opinion in the Sunshine State, but the best way to “freeze the clocks” may be to stop springing forward. That would mean we stick to standard time year-round (that’s the “fall back” time we observe in the fall and winter).

This goes directly against what Florida lawmakers already voted on in 2018: to be on permanent Daylight Saving Time. That needs congressional approval, so Florida’s U.S. Sen. Rick Scott has refiled bipartisan legislation to make Daylight Saving Time — or DST — the national year-round standard. Supporters say DST equals longer afternoons and more time for people to enjoy daylight, go shopping and exercise.

We appreciate Scott’s effort to end this outdated practice, and to do it in a uniform fashion across the U.S., but permanent DST has many pitfalls.

The practice of “springing forward” is an artificial, human-made convention first adopted during World War I as an attempt to conserve energy — though there’s debate about its actual savings. Arizona and Hawaii, as well as U.S. territories such as Puerto Rico, do not observe DST.

Meanwhile, standard time most closely aligns with our body’s circadian rhythms, which regulates sleep, and leads to better health outcomes, according to several experts.

A 2025 Stanford Medicine study concluded that permanent standard time would result in 300,000 fewer people having suffered from a stroke because of time changes. Permanent DST would achieve about two-thirds of the same effect. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine advocates for the end of DST and for permanent standard time. Other medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, share this position.

“Permanent standard time helps synchronize the body clock with the rising and setting of the sun,” said Dr. James A. Rowley, president of the AASM said in a 2023 statement.

If you need more evidence, just look at America’s own precedent.

In the 1970s, Congress decided to observe DST year-round. That only lasted 10 months after widespread frustration and early-morning car crashes. Seventy-nine percent of Americans favored the change before it went into effect, according to the Washington Post. But once they began to experience it, many people had buyer’s remorse.

The New York Times called the change “the Second Dark Age.” Children carried flashlights to school. A man told the Times back then that it was “pitch black at 7:30 in the morning.”

Advocates for permanent DST seemingly ignore that later sunsets also mean later sunrises — and more people commuting or going to school in the dark.

In Miami-Dade, the latest sunrise would happen at 8:10 a.m. under year-round DST, instead of 7:37 a.m., according to a 2024 Washington Post analysis. Parts of North Florida wouldn’t see the sun until 8:30 a.m., when many schools have already started and people are already at work or on their way.

The impact on northern states would be much worse than in Florida, with winter sunrises later than 9 a.m. No wonder Americans in the 1970s said sunless mornings made them “cranky, sad and less safe,” the Post reported.

The trade-off by switching to permanent standard time, of course, would be shorter afternoons. Parts of Maine, for example, would see darkness as early as 3:45 p.m. In Miami-Dade, that change wouldn’t be so drastic: the earliest sunset would happen at 5:31 p.m. in the winter and the latest at 7:15 p.m. in the summer, according to the Post analysis. Not bad.

In the end, people may disagree on the solution to this biannual problem. But enough state and national leaders realize how unproductive and annoying changing the clocks is every spring and fall. Let’s put an end to it, one way or another.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

What's an editorial?

Editorials are opinion pieces that reflect the views of the Miami Herald Editorial Board, a group of opinion journalists that operates separately from the Miami Herald newsroom. Miami Herald Editorial Board members are: opinion editor Amy Driscoll and editorial writers Isadora Rangel and Mary Anna Mancuso. Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.

What's the difference between an op-ed and a column?

Op-Eds, short for “opposite the editorial page,” are opinion pieces written by contributors who are not affiliated with our Editorial Board.

Columns are recurring opinion pieces that represent the views of staff columnists that regularly appear on the op-ed page.

How does the Miami Herald Editorial Board decide what to write about?

The Editorial Board, made up of experienced opinion journalists, primarily addresses local and state issues that affect South Florida residents. Each board member has an area of focus, such as education, COVID or local government policy. Board members meet daily and bring up an array of topics for discussion. Once a topic is fully discussed, board members will further report the issue, interviewing stakeholders and others involved and affected, so that the board can present the most informed opinion possible. We strive to provide our community with thought leadership that advocates for policies and priorities that strengthen our communities. Our editorials promote social justice, fairness in economic, educational and social opportunities and an end to systemic racism and inequality. The Editorial Board is separate from the reporters and editors of the Miami Herald newsroom.

How can I contribute to the Miami Herald Opinion section?

The Editorial Board accepts op-ed submissions of 650-700 words from community members who want to argue a specific viewpoint or idea that is relevant to our area. You can email an op-ed submission to oped@miamiherald.com. We also accept 150-word letters to the editor from readers who want to offer their points of view on current issues. For more information on how to submit a letter, go here.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER