Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

Florida lawmakers: It’s time to consider regulations on AI to protect students | Opinion

In this photo illustration, Artificial Intelligence apps -- Perplexity, DeepSeek and ChatGPT -- are seen on a smartphone screen.
In this photo illustration, Artificial Intelligence apps -- Perplexity, DeepSeek and ChatGPT -- are seen on a smartphone screen. May James / SOPA Images/Sipa USA

Artificial Intelligence has found its way into Miami-Dade classrooms. In the third-largest school district in the country, 100,000 students are now using Google’s Gemini chatbot in the classroom.

Miami-Dade County Public Schools teachers are experimenting with AI tools to grade essays and bring their lesson plans to life by enlisting chatbots to impersonate historical figures, according to a May story in the New York Times.

That’s both exciting and troubling. Left unchecked, AI risks opening the door to a decline in students’ critical thinking skills and giving too much power to technology rather than teachers. We understand the temptation of asking ChatGPT when you’ve got a question that would require a lot of research.

At a press conference this summer, Gov. Ron DeSantis wondered out loud about the ramifications. “Are students going to have artificial intelligence write their term papers? Do we even need to think?” His concerns are well-founded.

And it’s not just critical thinking that could be affected. AI doesn’t always provide correct information, increasing the risk of misinformation being accepted as truth. And yet, AI is being used more and more by teens. A recent study by Common Sense Media found that approximately 72% of teens have used AI as a companion at least once, and more than half are regular users. In the same study, one in four admitted to sharing personal details with chatbots, and younger teens, ages 13 and 14, were found more likely to trust AI answers.

Florida has already seen what happens when social media is left unchecked. Parental controls weren’t enough to protect kids. Now, an anxious generation has emerged — shaped by Instagram and TikTok’s addictive algorithms. AI could be the same and much worse.

Last year, DeSantis signed into law one of the most restrictive social media bans in the country. The law stopped kids under 14 from having social media accounts and required parental permission for use by 14- and 15-year-olds. A federal judge in June blocked Florida from fully enforcing the ban on constitutional grounds, though the judge acknowledged “sincere concerns” of parents and lawmakers. The state has unsuccessfully sought to have the lawsuit dismissed.

The University of Florida has created the Florida K-12 AI Education Task Force, and they’ve developed AI guidelines for schools. That’s a step in the right direction. With over two dozen district partnerships — including Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties — the task force offers guidance on how to safely use AI in the classroom. From toolkits to training resources, its work highlights privacy and how to keep students from being overly reliant on chatbots. The group is tackling tough issues like ethical considerations for educators, students and IT professionals.

But guidelines aren’t the same as regulation. This is a huge challenge, too. Each county shouldn’t be left on its own to decide what kind of standards to put in place. Lawmakers should use the task force’s efforts as inspiration. So far only two states, Ohio and Tennessee, have passed laws requiring school districts to have policies about the use of AI in schools though other states are issuing guidance on AI policy.

And AI continues to be a focus in Tallahassee: A House subcommittee on insurance and banking held a panel discussion Tuesday on the use of AI in the insurance industry. The subcommittee chairman, Rep. Brad Yeager, R-New Port Richey, told Politico the meeting was strictly “educational” for now.

This is not just up to the states. Congress has a key role, too. President Trump, though, has taken the opposite approach, pushing to remove any state laws that could be “burdensome” to developing AI technology. He is advocating for national standards, not state regulation. His goal: to make the U.S. the dominant player in AI technology.

So where does that leave Florida? AI is going to require at least as much scrutiny as social media. We’re already experiencing the consequences of allowing social media algorithms unfettered access to our children.

AI use is growing by the day. Its future is still unknown. Teaching students about it is the only responsible path. But the dangers are real. Florida shouldn’t wait for the federal government. If the state sets up guardrails now for use by students, we can lead on the use of AI in classrooms.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

What's an editorial?

Editorials are opinion pieces that reflect the views of the Miami Herald Editorial Board, a group of opinion journalists that operates separately from the Miami Herald newsroom. Miami Herald Editorial Board members are: opinion editor Amy Driscoll and editorial writers Isadora Rangel and Mary Anna Mancuso. Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.

What's the difference between an op-ed and a column?

Op-Eds, short for “opposite the editorial page,” are opinion pieces written by contributors who are not affiliated with our Editorial Board.

Columns are recurring opinion pieces that represent the views of staff columnists that regularly appear on the op-ed page.

How does the Miami Herald Editorial Board decide what to write about?

The Editorial Board, made up of experienced opinion journalists, primarily addresses local and state issues that affect South Florida residents. Each board member has an area of focus, such as education, COVID or local government policy. Board members meet daily and bring up an array of topics for discussion. Once a topic is fully discussed, board members will further report the issue, interviewing stakeholders and others involved and affected, so that the board can present the most informed opinion possible. We strive to provide our community with thought leadership that advocates for policies and priorities that strengthen our communities. Our editorials promote social justice, fairness in economic, educational and social opportunities and an end to systemic racism and inequality. The Editorial Board is separate from the reporters and editors of the Miami Herald newsroom.

How can I contribute to the Miami Herald Opinion section?

The Editorial Board accepts op-ed submissions of 650-700 words from community members who want to argue a specific viewpoint or idea that is relevant to our area. You can email an op-ed submission to oped@miamiherald.com. We also accept 150-word letters to the editor from readers who want to offer their points of view on current issues. For more information on how to submit a letter, go here.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER