4 years later, details of Surfside collapse keep emerging. So do the lessons | Opinion
The catastrophe that unfolded at the beachfront Champlain Towers South condo in Surfside four years ago apparently had its roots all the way back in 1981 — the day the building first welcomed residents, who were unaware of the condo towers’ fatal design flaws embedded in its foundation, baked into its most becoming feature.
This week, federal investigators announced they are close to a final conclusion on the cause of the collapse. After ruling out 12 other theories, they say the failure began in the pool deck, which dramatically dragged down the rest of the 12-story building and took 98 lives.
But does anyone feel shocked that the pool deck is likely the culprit? Will pinpointing the cause bring closure to those who lost loved ones in the rubble on June 24, 2021? Hardly.
Four years later, this conclusion feels less like a revelation and more like a haunting reminder of what happened — and what we suspected as the cause in those first hours after the tragedy.
Cassie Stratton, a 40-year-old resident, said as much in her final moments. She called her husband in Washington at 1:30 a.m. on June 24: “Honey, the pool is caving in… the ground is shaking, everything’s shaking.” She was among the 98 people who lost their lives that night.
Other clues were the cracks in planter walls, the leaks in the underground garage and the much-delayed 40-year inspection. In the weeks before the collapse, the building was crying out for attention.
Investigators with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) said in their latest update that the cause of the building failure seems to be a flawed original design from the 1980s, when building codes were weak and enforcement of construction standards was lax. NIST investigators had previously said the slab-column connection under the pool deck didn’t meet code and had steel reinforcement was missing, misplaced or eaten away by corrosion. When the connection gave way, the building’s fate was sealed.
So what good does this belated confirmation bring? It may help engineers and inspectors better understand the mechanics of this failure. It may add weight and justification to the $ 1 billion settlement reached with victims’ families. The final report is still due and may shed more light on what happened. Investigators said they plan to finish their technical work by the end of 2025 and begin drafting the ultimate conclusions.
For Florida, the question is whether these findings ultimately do more, continuing to reshape the way we build, regulate and maintain our high rises.
The Miami Herald’s Pulitzer Prize-winning investigation in 2021 showed that Surfside was not a freak accident but the predictable outcome of negligence, complacency and lax oversight. The federal investigation seems to confirm that.
But accountability has a short shelf life in Florida. The architects are gone. The developers cashed out decades ago. Condo boards change with elections. Yes, Florida lawmakers have passed stricter laws to improve condominium safety including mandatory “milestone inspections” for buildings three stories or taller over 30 years old, imposing requirements for “structural integrity reserve studies” and updating rules for funding reserves and hurricane-hardening programs.
The laws were adjusted this year, because of their adverse impact on condo living. Deadlines were extended. Alternatives to reserve funds were created. Affordability — not safety — became the louder argument in Tallahassee. It’s a tough calculation: What good is an affordable condo if it’s not safe to live in?
The construction industry, too, is on notice. Surfside is a cautionary tale. Affordability can’t be more important than safety, and codes exist for a reason.
Champlain Towers South was not unique. Florida is full of aging oceanfront condos. This is about more than one doomed pool deck. It’s about denial — residents who resist higher assessments, boards that postpone repairs and lawmakers who worry more about backlash than safety.
When the final report comes out next year, it cannot be the last word on this tragedy. It must be the continuation of reform.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREWhat's an editorial?
Editorials are opinion pieces that reflect the views of the Miami Herald Editorial Board, a group of opinion journalists that operates separately from the Miami Herald newsroom. Miami Herald Editorial Board members are: opinion editor Amy Driscoll and editorial writers Isadora Rangel and Mary Anna Mancuso. Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
What's the difference between an op-ed and a column?
How does the Miami Herald Editorial Board decide what to write about?
The Editorial Board, made up of experienced opinion journalists, primarily addresses local and state issues that affect South Florida residents. Each board member has an area of focus, such as education, COVID or local government policy. Board members meet daily and bring up an array of topics for discussion. Once a topic is fully discussed, board members will further report the issue, interviewing stakeholders and others involved and affected, so that the board can present the most informed opinion possible. We strive to provide our community with thought leadership that advocates for policies and priorities that strengthen our communities. Our editorials promote social justice, fairness in economic, educational and social opportunities and an end to systemic racism and inequality. The Editorial Board is separate from the reporters and editors of the Miami Herald newsroom.
How can I contribute to the Miami Herald Opinion section?
The Editorial Board accepts op-ed submissions of 650-700 words from community members who want to argue a specific viewpoint or idea that is relevant to our area. You can email an op-ed submission to oped@miamiherald.com. We also accept 150-word letters to the editor from readers who want to offer their points of view on current issues. For more information on how to submit a letter, go here.