Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

Bondi promised Epstein’s client list. Then it fell apart and now MAGA is turning on her  | Opinion

Attorney General Pam Bondi on March 24, 2025 at the White House
Attorney General Pam Bondi on March 24, 2025 at the White House Sipa USA

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi is facing intense criticism for failing to stand up her promises on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged client list, and it could be her downfall.

Much of this is Bondi’s own fault. Earlier this year, Bondi vowed to release the list, telling Fox News on Feb. 21, “It’s sitting on my desk right now to review” — a reference to the long-awaited and much-speculated-about list of powerful figures connected to the late disgraced financier.

But after months of investigation, the Department of Justice and the FBI said there is no such list. A memo released earlier this week bearing the logos of both agencies stated that a “systematic review revealed no incriminating ‘client list.’” Nor did they find credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed people or any evidence that he was murdered in jail, rather than killing himself — claims that have been feeding the controversy around the Epstein case.

Bondi, a former Florida attorney general, has now found herself the focus of MAGA outrage over the Epstein case. That’s quite a turnaround considering the case — much of which was based in Florida — helped elevate her profile as the face of Trump’s DOJ. Now it’s become a political albatross around her neck.

For months, Bondi has publicly promoted the idea that she would release the Epstein files and the list to the public.

In February, she distributed white binders labeled “Epstein Files: Phase 1” to a group of Trump-allied influencers, a move that seemed to signal the start of a long-promised reckoning. But it quickly became clear that the binders contained little new information. It was a far cry from the bombshell people were hoping for.

Instead of backing away from the narrative, Bondi went further, falsely blaming the FBI for withholding information. In a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel, Bondi wrote, “I repeatedly questioned whether this was the full set of documents.”

Days later, Bondi went on Fox News’ Hannity and said that she had received a “truckload” of Epstein files.

She also pointed fingers at the Biden administration, accusing it of sitting on Epstein information and vowing that things would be different under her direction and President Donald Trump. “And it’s a new day. It’s a new administration, and everything’s going to come out to the public. The public has the right to know, Americans have a right to know,” Bondi told Sean Hannity on Fox News in March.

Bondi has positioned herself — and others — as transparency advocates who would finally deliver justice where others had failed. But the DOJ and FBI’s own review has undermined that narrative.

Her fall has been rough. MAGA influencers who once cheered her on are now calling for her to resign or be fired. MAGA influencer Laura Loomer wrote on X, “Please join me in calling for Blondi to RESIGN!”

The irony is glaring. Bondi claimed the Biden administration was hiding Epstein secrets. Now, she’s being accused of misleading the public by over-promising and under-delivering. What began for Bondi as potential signature achievement has become a career-threatening misstep.

By putting narrative over truth — a hallmark of Trump-era politics — Bondi fanned the flames of conspiracy theories for political gain. When the facts failed to support her claims, she found herself held hostage by the truth.



Send a letter to the editor to heralded@miamiherald.com
Send a letter to the editor to heralded@miamiherald.com

Click here to send the letter.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

What's an editorial?

Editorials are opinion pieces that reflect the views of the Miami Herald Editorial Board, a group of opinion journalists that operates separately from the Miami Herald newsroom. Miami Herald Editorial Board members are: opinion editor Amy Driscoll and editorial writers Isadora Rangel and Mary Anna Mancuso. Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.

What's the difference between an op-ed and a column?

Op-Eds, short for “opposite the editorial page,” are opinion pieces written by contributors who are not affiliated with our Editorial Board.

Columns are recurring opinion pieces that represent the views of staff columnists that regularly appear on the op-ed page.

How does the Miami Herald Editorial Board decide what to write about?

The Editorial Board, made up of experienced opinion journalists, primarily addresses local and state issues that affect South Florida residents. Each board member has an area of focus, such as education, COVID or local government policy. Board members meet daily and bring up an array of topics for discussion. Once a topic is fully discussed, board members will further report the issue, interviewing stakeholders and others involved and affected, so that the board can present the most informed opinion possible. We strive to provide our community with thought leadership that advocates for policies and priorities that strengthen our communities. Our editorials promote social justice, fairness in economic, educational and social opportunities and an end to systemic racism and inequality. The Editorial Board is separate from the reporters and editors of the Miami Herald newsroom.

How can I contribute to the Miami Herald Opinion section?

The Editorial Board accepts op-ed submissions of 650-700 words from community members who want to argue a specific viewpoint or idea that is relevant to our area. You can email an op-ed submission to oped@miamiherald.com. We also accept 150-word letters to the editor from readers who want to offer their points of view on current issues. For more information on how to submit a letter, go here.

This story was originally published July 11, 2025 at 4:00 PM.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER