Why does it take a billionaire (or two) to stop lawmakers pushing casinos on Florida? | Opinion
It shouldn’t take a billionaire stepping in to make Florida lawmakers do what’s right.
And yet, that’s pretty clearly what just happened in Tallahassee.
A bill in the Florida Legislature that would have allowed a casino at the famed Miami Beach Fontainebleau hotel was headed for a vote in a Senate committee last week. It was moving forward despite decades-long, vociferous local and state opposition, complete with a state constitutional amendment specifying that only voters could make that decision.
And then, just like that, the legislation was declared unofficially dead last week. Even though Gov. Ron DeSantis — and this may be a shock to the system for DeSantis-dominated Florida — apparently wanted the bill to pass.
What’s behind the reversal of the bill? Let’s start with this: New Miami resident and hedge fund CEO Ken Griffin wrote a letter to the editor in the Miami Herald last week denouncing what he called “reckless legislation.”
The Citadel chief compared expanding casinos to “willingly dumping toxic waste into the Everglades.“ He followed up those strong words with a statement saying that the measure would “let the Legislature skirt the explicit will of the people.”
He wasn’t alone. A powerful group of South Florida business leaders also had planned a trip to Tallahassee to fight the measure. Miami Beach city officials had voted to accept use of a plane owned by yet another billionaire — Miami auto magnate Norman Braman — to fly more than 100 people to Tallahassee to oppose the idea in person at the hearing.
Braman and developer Armando Codina, who were both set to contribute funds for the trip, have been some of the strongest opponents of gambling expansion for years.
Weeks before that, Miami Beach Commissioner Alex Fernandez, in an opinion piece for the Miami Herald, also spoke out against the proposal. Miami Beach was already deeply concerned about public safety and quality of life; an expansion of gambling would only worsen those issues.
The legislation sought to allow the relocation of gambling facilities within the state through the transfer of gambling licenses, even in places “like ours where gambling activities are presently prohibited by law in all zoning districts throughout the city,” Fernandez wrote. In other words, the state was once again trying to bypass home rule.
But the Miami Beach delegation never even had to step foot on a plane. The legislation was pulled from the committee’s agenda.
It was a triumph of home rule over state intrusion, something we rarely see any more in Florida.
As we digest this strangely positive turn of events, a moment when the will of the people wasn’t trampled underfoot, let’s remember 2018. That’s when Floridians voted overwhelmingly across the state for a constitutional amendment that was supposed to keep the right to expand gambling in the hands of voters, not lawmakers.
Lawmakers seemed largely unperturbed by the idea of ignoring the state constitution — the amendment passed with a whopping 71% of the vote — until a billionaire (or two) stepped in.
Griffin, by the way, is a GOP mega donor. But Jeffrey Soffer, owner of the Fountainebleau, also has financial ties to the GOP — and also is a billionaire. He gave more than $300,000 last year to PACs that support legislators, including nine from Miami-Dade, and another $1 million to a super PAC that supported DeSantis’ presidential bid, according to the Miami Herald.
It took a billionaire to temper this desires of another billionaire, with Florida caught in the middle.
If we’ve learned anything about the perseverance of the gambling industry, it’s that they never give up. We have to assume this will be back in some form in 2025 or sooner. This year’s bill is not officially dead until the legislative session ends in March.
This is a win — for today. But what does it say about Florida that it takes a billionaire or two to stop lawmakers from ignoring the wishes of voters?
Click here to send the letter.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREWhat's an editorial?
Editorials are opinion pieces that reflect the views of the Miami Herald Editorial Board, a group of opinion journalists that operates separately from the Miami Herald newsroom. Miami Herald Editorial Board members are: opinion editor Amy Driscoll and editorial writers Isadora Rangel and Mary Anna Mancuso. Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
What's the difference between an op-ed and a column?
How does the Miami Herald Editorial Board decide what to write about?
The Editorial Board, made up of experienced opinion journalists, primarily addresses local and state issues that affect South Florida residents. Each board member has an area of focus, such as education, COVID or local government policy. Board members meet daily and bring up an array of topics for discussion. Once a topic is fully discussed, board members will further report the issue, interviewing stakeholders and others involved and affected, so that the board can present the most informed opinion possible. We strive to provide our community with thought leadership that advocates for policies and priorities that strengthen our communities. Our editorials promote social justice, fairness in economic, educational and social opportunities and an end to systemic racism and inequality. The Editorial Board is separate from the reporters and editors of the Miami Herald newsroom.
How can I contribute to the Miami Herald Opinion section?
The Editorial Board accepts op-ed submissions of 650-700 words from community members who want to argue a specific viewpoint or idea that is relevant to our area. You can email an op-ed submission to oped@miamiherald.com. We also accept 150-word letters to the editor from readers who want to offer their points of view on current issues. For more information on how to submit a letter, go here.