Parkland father rudely interrupts President Biden. Was he wrong? | Editorial
Four years after his son Joaquin was shot and killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Broward County, Manuel Oliver’s pain is still raw.
Right or wrong, he took his personal fight to the White House lawn on Monday. On national television, Oliver rudely interrupted President Biden during an event meant to celebrate what many consider a bipartisan, but watered-down, law to reduce gun violence.
“Today is many things. It’s proof that despite the naysayers, we can make meaningful progress in dealing with gun violence. Because make no mistake . . .” Biden was saying when Oliver who jumped up from his chair on the lawn.
“We have to do more than that!” Oliver yelled from the audience, startling guests and the president.
‘Sit down!’
Television footage shows Oliver standing and shouting at Biden, who briefly turned into “tough Joe” and ordered Oliver to “Sit down, you’ll hear what I have to say. . . . Let me finish my comments.”
Oliver, who has become a well-known gun-control activist in Florida, was approached by security and then escorted out. Was he disrespectful, yes, but was his behavior totally understandable? Yes, too.
Oliver’s outburst makes clear that no Minnie Mouse legislation will never be enough until we do away with assault weapons. We, and every lawmaker, must be reminded of that daily — and sometimes rudely.
Social media has been mixed on whether Oliver should have shouted at the president. But then most on social media do not feel the pain Oliver and his wife continue to harbor at the violent loss of their 17-year-old to a troubled teen who legally purchased a weapon and turned into a vile school shooter on Feb. 14, 2018.
Assault weapons are killing us
The new law in question, passed after recent mass shootings in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas, incrementally toughens requirements for young people buying guns, denies firearms to more domestic abusers and helps local authorities temporarily take weapons from people judged to be dangerous.
Oliver appeared to be offended by the White House event, which may have overreached by billing the event billed as a celebration. Not much to celebrate, Oliver told reporters.
He later told a Miami Herald reporter: “There’s nothing to celebrate. It’s a big lie. We lie between ourselves thinking we have a solution to this when we actually don’t.”
Oliver is right, but what the president was trying to bring home is that in this arduous battle, small victories must be acknowledged.
The law comes a week after a gunman in Highland Park, Illinois, killed seven people at a Fourth of July parade.
Parkland parents, the Uvalde parents, the Sandy Hook parents and scores of other survivors of shooting victims have watched for years as nothing substantive has been passed by Congress or state governments to end or, at the very least, slow the sale of assault weapons in the United States.
Oliver’s anger may have been misplaced. Biden is not to blame; he has pushed to get at least some legislation passed.
Aggrieved Floridians could direct more blame toward Republican Florida Sens. Marco Rubio and Rick Scott, who voted against even this diluted legislation.
Oliver is not the first Parkland parent to stage the disruption of a national event. In 2020, Fred Guttenberg, whose 14-year-old daughter, Jaime, was also killed at Parkland, was a guest of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi when he disrupted then-President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address.
Oliver’s heartwrenching outburst reminded us of the horror of Parkland. Yes, four years on, many of us have moved on. And for that, we’re to blame.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREWhat's an editorial?
Editorials are opinion pieces that reflect the views of the Miami Herald Editorial Board, a group of opinion journalists that operates separately from the Miami Herald newsroom. Miami Herald Editorial Board members are: opinion editor Amy Driscoll and editorial writers Isadora Rangel and Mary Anna Mancuso. Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
What's the difference between an op-ed and a column?
How does the Miami Herald Editorial Board decide what to write about?
The Editorial Board, made up of experienced opinion journalists, primarily addresses local and state issues that affect South Florida residents. Each board member has an area of focus, such as education, COVID or local government policy. Board members meet daily and bring up an array of topics for discussion. Once a topic is fully discussed, board members will further report the issue, interviewing stakeholders and others involved and affected, so that the board can present the most informed opinion possible. We strive to provide our community with thought leadership that advocates for policies and priorities that strengthen our communities. Our editorials promote social justice, fairness in economic, educational and social opportunities and an end to systemic racism and inequality. The Editorial Board is separate from the reporters and editors of the Miami Herald newsroom.
How can I contribute to the Miami Herald Opinion section?
The Editorial Board accepts op-ed submissions of 650-700 words from community members who want to argue a specific viewpoint or idea that is relevant to our area. You can email an op-ed submission to oped@miamiherald.com. We also accept 150-word letters to the editor from readers who want to offer their points of view on current issues. For more information on how to submit a letter, go here.
This story was originally published July 11, 2022 at 9:33 PM.