Prosecutors’ blame-the-victim game in Epstein’s case was a disturbing injustice | Opinion
The newly released Palm Beach grand jury records in the Jeffrey Epstein case reveal disturbing tactics used by his high-powered legal team in 2006 to manipulate the justice system and help the billionaire escape accountability for his heinous crimes. They succeeded; It was a travesty of justice.
What those 200 pages of transcripts reveal should be a cautionary tale. They show Epstein was aided not only by the lawyers on his payroll, but also by prosecutors in charge of proving Epstein’s guilt but who instead smeared the reputation of his underage victims before a grand jury. The girls were lured to his home to give him paid massages and ended up being sexually assaulted.
The documents reveal the blame-the-victim game Palm Beach prosecutors played by painting the girls as drug addicts, liars, thieves, prostitutes and questionable characters not worthy of belief. Grand jury members appeared to believe the false narrative. Epstein skated out of trouble.
During their testimony, each underage victim was confronted with questions about whether they understood that they had engaged in prostitution and could be charged with a crime. That was akin to asking a rape victim what type of clothing she was wearing.
“Did you have any idea that deep inside of you that you — what you’re doing is wrong?” a juror asked one of two girls who testified.
More importantly, the records also mark a point in time when Epstein could have been stopped. Instead, he went on to molest scores of other girls.
The grand jury was impaneled by then-Palm Beach State Attorney Barry Krischer, who had for months resisted efforts by the Palm Beach Police Department to charge Epstein with multiple felonies for his alleged sexual exploitation of underage girls. The probe had begun when the stepmother of a 14-year-old girl reported that her daughter had received $300 to massage an older man on Palm Beach Island. It was Epstein.
Epstein eventually pleaded guilty to two charges of soliciting prostitution and served a light prison sentence. But in the years since the Epstein case was closed in 2008, Miami Herald investigative reporter Julie K. Brown wrote a series called “Perversion of Justice” that details Epstein’s dark world, made acceptable by his wealth, legion of powerful friends, fancy homes in New York, Paris and the Virgin Islands, and the private jets he used to travel and transport his victims.
After the Herald published its investigative series, a federal judge ruled the non-prosecution agreement eventually brokered by Epstein’s legal team with then-South Florida U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta was illegal. Epstein was rearrested on sex trafficking charges in New York. The following month, Acosta was forced to resign as U.S. Secretary of Labor. On August 2019, Epstein died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell.
A Palm Beach County judge unsealed the controversial grand jury records on Monday after years of legal action by the Palm Beach Post, the Miami Herald, CNN, the New York Times and others. And, earlier this year, the Florida legislature passed a new law unseal the Epstein grand jury records, usually kept secret.
The prosecutor’s job is to serve justice for victims, not aid in their re-victimization, which is what occurred here. Epstein was an unusual defendant. He was calling the shots, jockeying to escape prosecution with money and influence. But prosecutors should have held firm in efforts to convict a man who became a notorious sex trafficker.
By casting doubt on the underage girls’ testimonies and credibility, the prosecutor helped Epstein’s expensive legal team achieve their goal. This allowed Epstein to continue abusing underage girls for 11 more years. What an atrocity.
The tactics used were unethical, reprehensible, and a gross disservice to Epstein’s victims. They show how power, money and influence can manipulate a system meant to protect the innocent. It is a failure of justice that must never be repeated.
Click here to send the letter.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREWhat's an editorial?
Editorials are opinion pieces that reflect the views of the Miami Herald Editorial Board, a group of opinion journalists that operates separately from the Miami Herald newsroom. Miami Herald Editorial Board members are: opinion editor Amy Driscoll and editorial writers Isadora Rangel and Mary Anna Mancuso. Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
What's the difference between an op-ed and a column?
How does the Miami Herald Editorial Board decide what to write about?
The Editorial Board, made up of experienced opinion journalists, primarily addresses local and state issues that affect South Florida residents. Each board member has an area of focus, such as education, COVID or local government policy. Board members meet daily and bring up an array of topics for discussion. Once a topic is fully discussed, board members will further report the issue, interviewing stakeholders and others involved and affected, so that the board can present the most informed opinion possible. We strive to provide our community with thought leadership that advocates for policies and priorities that strengthen our communities. Our editorials promote social justice, fairness in economic, educational and social opportunities and an end to systemic racism and inequality. The Editorial Board is separate from the reporters and editors of the Miami Herald newsroom.
How can I contribute to the Miami Herald Opinion section?
The Editorial Board accepts op-ed submissions of 650-700 words from community members who want to argue a specific viewpoint or idea that is relevant to our area. You can email an op-ed submission to oped@miamiherald.com. We also accept 150-word letters to the editor from readers who want to offer their points of view on current issues. For more information on how to submit a letter, go here.
This story was originally published July 6, 2024 at 5:00 AM with the headline "Prosecutors’ blame-the-victim game in Epstein’s case was a disturbing injustice | Opinion."