Platoon leader describes shock at Bergdahl’s disappearance

A military police officer patrols the perimeter of the US Army IMCOM HQ building prior to the Article 32 preliminary hearing to determine if Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl will be court-martialed, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2015, at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio.
A military police officer patrols the perimeter of the US Army IMCOM HQ building prior to the Article 32 preliminary hearing to determine if Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl will be court-martialed, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2015, at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio. ASSOCIATED PRESS

Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s commanding officer when the Idaho native vanished from his post in Afghanistan six years ago testified Thursday that he thought his soldiers were playing a joke on him when they told him that Bergdahl had gone missing.

Speaking at the outset of an Article 32 hearing to determine if Bergdahl should face a military trial on desertion and other charges, Capt. John Billings said that when he realized they were telling the truth, he was “in shock, absolute utter disbelief that I couldn’t find one of my own men. That’s a hard thing to swallow,” he told the military prosecutor, Maj. Margaret Kurz.

Kurz alleged that Bergdahl had planned for weeks to abandon his post and that there was enough evidence to warrant to go forward with a court-martial.

“Under the cover of darkness, he snuck off the post,” Kurz told the presiding officer.

Under the cover of darkness, he snuck off the post.

Maj. Margaret Kurz, military prosecutor

Bergdahl, who spent five years as a Taliban captive before being exchanged for five Taliban prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, took notes throughout the proceedings, which could last several days. When the presiding officer asked if he understood the charges, Bergdahl replied “Yes sir.”

Before the start of the hearing at Fort Sam Houston, where Bergdahl has been stationed since returning to the U.S. last year, legal experts said they expected Bergdahl’s lawyers to argue that he suffered enough during his years in captivity.

He disappeared from his post in southeastern Afghanistan on June 30, 2009 — after expressing opposition to the war in general and misgivings about his own role in it.

His lead attorney, Eugene Fidell, has cited an Army investigation that determined Bergdahl left his post, but not the Army, and that his “specific intent was to bring what he thought were disturbing circumstances to the attention of the nearest general officer.”

5 years as a POW, before the U.S. traded 5 Taliban captives for Bergdahl’s freedom

Fidell said he plans to call witnesses, but he declined to say whether Bergdahl would be among them.

Officials say the Taliban captured Bergdahl after he left his post. He is charged with desertion and misbehavior before the enemy. If convicted of the misbehavior charge, he could face up to life in a military prison. He could also be dishonorably discharged, reduced in rank and made to forfeit pay.

Some members of Bergdahl’s former unit have called for serious punishment, alleging that some service members died looking for him.

While the Pentagon has said there is no evidence anyone died searching for Bergdahl, legal experts say the misbehavior charge allows authorities to allege his actions endangered soldiers who searched for him.

If convicted, Bowe Bergdahl could be sentenced to life in a military prison

Billings, Bergdahl’s platoon leader, said the search for Bergdahl lasted from the day he went missing until the end of that August and that it was grueling, often involving little rest and temperatures in the high 90s.

Fidell has expressed concern that negative publicity that has been highly critical of Bergdahl could influence how the case is resolved. The GOP and some Democrats have long criticized the prisoner swap as politically motivated and a flagrant violation of U.S. policy against negotiating with terrorists.

Among those who have criticized Bergdahl have been GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, who has repeatedly called Bergdahl a traitor.

“I’m not going to dignify Mr. Trump’s comments any more than I have,” Fidell said. “The amount of abuse to which (Bergdahl) has been subjected to in the blogosphere and elsewhere concerns me greatly.”

Eric Carpenter, a law professor at Florida International University who also worked as a military attorney, said he expects Fidell will focus on arguing that the charges should not be referred to a court-martial, presenting evidence of how difficult it was for Bergdahl while in captivity.

He said Fidell might argue that Bergdahl should be given an “other than honorable discharge.”

Larry Youngner, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney who specializes in military law, said he believes there is a “very strong case” by the prosecution.

“We can’t have soldiers abandoning their posts in a combat zone during a time of war,” said Youngner. “This is a hugely serious offense.”

The Article 32 hearing will result in a report that will be forwarded to Gen. Robert Abrams, the commanding general of U.S. Army Forces Command. Abrams will decide whether the case should be referred to a court-martial or is resolved in another manner.

Military prosecutors declined to discuss the hearing.