The Obama administration is closing in on an agreement with Qatar to extend travel bans for five senior Taliban leaders released last year from the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in exchange for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, U.S. officials said Friday.
A deal now being negotiated with Qatar would see the restrictions that expire Monday extended for another six months, the officials said. If the talks are successful, the agreement could be announced over the weekend, according to the officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly speak to the matter.
The White House acknowledged that discussions were underway with Qatar as to how the former detainees should be handled but refused to divulge details.
“The United States has been in touch with our partners in Qatar about the kind of steps that we believe are important to protecting the national security of the American people,” press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to the Miami Herald
Under the terms of the May 2014 exchange, the five detainees were sent to Qatar, where government officials agreed to monitor their activities and prevent them from traveling out of the country for one year. In return, Bergdahl, who had been held captive by the Taliban for nearly five years after walking away from his Army post in Afghanistan, was released to the U.S. military. He recently was charged with desertion.
At least one of the five allegedly contacted militants during the past year while in Qatar. No details have been disclosed about that contact, but the White House confirmed that one was put under enhanced surveillance.
One or more of the detainees met with some members of the al-Qaida-affiliated Haqqani militant group in Qatar earlier in the year, according to Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. That was an indication that the group was reaching out to communicate with the so-called Taliban Five, said Graham, who predicted all five will rejoin the fight.
Four of the five former detainees remain on the United Nations’ blacklist, which freezes their assets and has them under a separate travel ban. But the U.N. itself has acknowledged that its travel ban has been violated. In a report late last year, the U.N. sanctions committee stated, “Regrettably, the monitoring team continues to receive a steady – albeit officially unconfirmed – flow of media reports indicating that some listed individuals have become increasingly adept at circumventing the sanctions measures, the travel ban in particular.”
The State Department insists that U.S. officials work to mitigate the risk of former Guantanamo detainees returning to the fight, threatening Americans or jeopardizing U.S. national security. U.S. officials have noted in the past that the five Taliban leaders are middle-aged or older, were former officials in the Taliban government and probably wouldn’t be seen again on any battlefield, although they could continue to be active members of the Taliban.
Members of Congress have repeatedly expressed concern about what will happen after the travel ban expires and criticized the administration for releasing the five in the first place. They have asked the Obama administration to try to persuade Qatar to extend the monitoring.
Many lawmakers from both parties disapproved when the five Guantanamo detainees were swapped for Bergdahl. They complained that the White House did not give Congress a 30-day notification of the transfer, which is required by law. The White House said it couldn’t wait 30 days because Bergdahl’s life was endangered.
After the transfer, the House Armed Services Committee demanded the Pentagon release internal documents about the swap. The committee received hundreds, but lawmakers complained that they were heavily redacted. The committee inserted language in the fiscal 2016 defense policy bill that threatens to cut Pentagon spending by about $500 million if the Defense Department doesn’t provide additional information about the exchange.
On Friday, lawmakers stepped up their calls.
“This release was a complete overreach by the White House, ignoring U.S. law,” said Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “Already over the past year, it’s been reported that the flimsy ‘security assurances’ in Qatar have been violated, jeopardizing our security. In a few days, these assurances disappear and Taliban leaders will be free to return to the battlefield, putting U.S. security interests and Americans at risk.”
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, meanwhile, said Congress would “continue our efforts to investigate the administration’s handling of the Taliban Five swap.”
Appeals court declines force-feed video case
WASHINGTON — A key appeals court declined Friday to get involved, for now, in a case about whether the public will get to see videotapes of a Guantánamo Bay detainee being force-fed.
In an eight-page decision, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reasoned that it was “without jurisdiction” to issue orders at this point. The decision is at least a temporary defeat for the Obama administration, which wanted the court to block release of the videotapes, but it is far from the end of the legal battle.
“We cannot reach the merits of this appeal...because it is premature,” the panel stated.
Leaving the matter with the trial judge, the appellate panel explained, could also yield several benefits.
“It is possible that appropriate redactions will limit the scope of, or perhaps eliminate altogether, the government’s concerns over release of the videotapes,” the appellate panel speculated.
The three appellate judges added, in a per curiam decision that’s attributed to the court rather than an individual author, that the trial judge now has “an opportunity to consider whether the eight-day time frame it set for the redaction process is reasonable in light of the declaration the government subsequently filed concerning the complexity of the task.”
The case revolves around videotapes of Abu Wa’el Dhiab, a Syria native who was seized in Pakistan and sent to Guantánamo Bay in 2002. Dhiab, 43, was released last December and now lives in Uruguay with five other former detainees. His lawsuit that formerly sought to stop the force-feedings, brought by attorney Jon B. Eisenberg and the human rights advocacy group Reprieve, now focuses on making the videotapes public.
The Obama administration’s Guantanamo Review Task Force cleared Dhiab for release in 2009, but he remained incarcerated until relatively recently. Dhiab and other protesting detainees initiated a hunger strike in early 2013, prompting authorities to begin force-feeding them.
More than a dozen news organizations, including McClatchy, The New York Times and The Washington Post, intervened in the case to press for release of the videotapes, which span about 11 hours.
In October, U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler ordered public release of the tapes once certain redactions had been made to protect individual identities. The Obama administration appealed that decision.
“The district court’s decision did not terminate the action, and it does not qualify as an immediately appealable collateral order,” the appellate panel stated Friday, adding, “nor does this case present the extraordinary circumstances required to grant the government’s alternative request for a writ of mandamus.”
MICHAEL DOYLE, McClatchy Washington Bureau