Trump's redistricting push suffers setbacks in Alabama, South Carolina

President Donald Trump’s push for Republican-led states to draw electoral maps more favorable to his party ahead of November’s midterm elections suffered twin setbacks on Tuesday, when efforts in South Carolina and Alabama to reshape U.S. House of Representatives districts were stymied.

In a rare break with Trump by members of his own party, several Republican state senators in South Carolina voted with Democrats to abandon a new map aimed at dismantling the U.S. House district held by congressman James Clyburn, a Black Democrat first elected to the seat more than three decades ago.

Separately, a panel of three federal judges blocked Alabama Republicans from installing a new map that would eliminate one of the state’s two districts with major Black populations, ruling that state lawmakers intentionally discriminated against Black voters in reconfiguring the boundaries.

At Trump’s urging, Republicans in several Southern states have rushed to implement new maps following a U.S. Supreme Court decision in April that weakened protections for U.S. House districts with significant Black or Latino populations.

Tennessee already has approved a new map that broke up a majority-Black, Democratic-held district based in Memphis, while Louisiana is advancing a plan to eliminate one of two districts with sizable Black populations in that state.

Black voters typically support Democrats.

Democrats and civil rights advocates have called the Republican moves racially discriminatory. Republican backers have said they are focused on partisan advantage, not race.

The effort across the South is part of a national fight over redistricting that Republicans appear to be winning, as they seek to retain their narrow U.S. House majority in the midterms. Democrats still have hope, with Trump registering low approval ratings in public opinion polls amid the unpopular Iran war and the higher gasoline prices it has caused.

South Carolina map fails

South Carolina’s proposed map would have positioned Republicans to sweep all seven U.S. House districts in the state after taking apart the district held by Clyburn, 85, a Democratic power broker.

Tuesday’s vote was the second time that the effort stalled in the state Senate. Five Republicans joined Democrats earlier this month to deny the two-thirds majority needed to advance the plan during a regular session of the chamber. 

Republican South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster, who previously had rejected White House pressure to call a special session, reversed course and brought lawmakers back to consider the map. The Republican-controlled state House of Representatives passed the map last week.

Early voting began in South Carolina on Tuesday in party primaries. Some Republican senators expressed concern that postponing the election might not withstand court challenges. Others said they could not support changing the map and putting off the primaries once ballots had already been cast.

“As far as I can tell, there is no historical precedent for a legislature to change the date of an election and redraw the maps once voting has begun,” Senator Richard Cash said during floor debate. 

Cash noted that tens of thousands of votes had been recorded by midday.

Republicans who voted against the proposed map could face political repercussions, though state senators are not up for reelection until 2028. Several Indiana lawmakers who had rebuffed the president’s demand for a new map lost their primaries to Trump-backed challengers this month.

Alabama map deemed illegal

In Alabama, a three-judge panel decided that a Republican-backed map intentionally discriminated against Black voters and could not be used for the 2026 elections. Instead, the court said, Alabama must continue to use a map that has two districts with sizable Black populations, not just one.

Republican officials in Alabama immediately said they would appeal to the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court.

Republican Alabama Governor Kay Ivey previously postponed until August the party primaries for four U.S. House districts that were redrawn as part of the disputed map, which was first approved in 2023.

The map breaks up a district in which Black people comprise just shy of 50% of the population. White people make up about 40% of the district, with other minorities including Asian and Hispanic people filling out the balance. Black people make up about a quarter of Alabama’s population. The district is currently represented by congressman Shomari Figures, who is Black.

The same panel of judges found the map discriminatory in 2023 and blocked it. Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court granted Alabama’s request to lift that block, and directed the judges to reconsider their findings in light of its April decision that raised the bar for challenging electoral maps on the basis of race.

But the panel reached the same conclusion: that the map purposefully and unlawfully targeted Black voters.

“Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination,” wrote the panel, which includes two judges appointed by Trump and one appointed by Democratic former President Bill Clinton.

Democrats hold Alabama’s two districts with sizeable Black populations. Republicans control the state’s other five districts.

Florida redistricting map to stay for 2026 after judge declines to block it

In some good news for the administration, Florida’s new congressional map is likely locked in.

The map can stay in place for the 2026 elections after a Tallahassee judge denied a request for a preliminary injunction Tuesday.

Drafted by a staffer in Gov. Ron DeSantis’ office, the redesign could give the GOP four more seats among Florida’s 28 districts and help the Republican Party hold on to control of Congress.

On social media, DeSantis celebrated the decision, posting a photo of the map and writing, “Let’s roll!”

Some of the plaintiffs, including left-leaning organizations like the League of Women Voters of Florida and Common Cause, said they would appeal Judge Joshua Hawkes’ denial.

“Because Floridians of all political backgrounds are so clearly against partisan gerrymandering, we will exhaust all legal options to make sure a map this partisan does not last the rest of this decade,” Amy Keith, Common Cause Florida’s executive director, said in a statement.

But as the case continues, the election inches closer. The primary is Aug. 18, and candidates for Congress need to qualify for the race by June 12.

Already, attorneys representing Florida have argued it would be too close to the election to throw out the map, which DeSantis signed into law in early May after a speedy two-day special session.

Hawkes seems to agree. In his order, he said, “Public interest weighs more in favor of certainty than a haphazard judicial mandate of discarded maps.”

Opponents of DeSantis’ plan accuse him of creating a map that violates Florida’s Fair Districts Amendment, a constitutional provision adopted by the voters that prohibits partisan gerrymandering.

While DeSantis has steered clear of saying Trump had any influence on the state redistricting, groups say that the motivation — benefiting the Republican Party — is obvious. The governor’s office first released the map to Fox News, color-coded red and blue to show the GOP’s potential pickups.

Under the new map, Tampa Bay could lose its lone Democratic representative. Tampa would be split three ways. St. Petersburg would be split in two, with the southern half of the city included in a district that stretches south and east to capture rural DeSoto and Hardee counties.

Tampa Bay Times contributed to this report.

Copyright Reuters or USA Today Network via Reuters Connect.

This story was originally published May 26, 2026 at 5:28 PM.