Meta borrows an ad tactic it usually bans on its own apps

Every big platform has the same uncomfortable secret. The kind of content it tells users to avoid is often the kind that pulls in the most traffic. Clickbait. Outrage. "You won't believe what happened next."

Meta (META) has spent close to a decade publicly fighting this stuff. The company calls it engagement bait. Posts that beg for reactions, lean on hollow promises of easy money, or hide what they're actually selling.

Pages that repeatedly use it get demoted in feeds. The rules, Meta tells advertisers, apply to everyone. The Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, has piled on, with enforcement guidelines that allow fines of more than $50,000 per undisclosed paid endorsement.

So when I started looking into a wave of viral "easy side hustle" clips blanketing Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube this spring, I expected another small-time pop-up.

What the reporting actually shows is that the brand behind those ads is one Mark Zuckerberg paid roughly $2 billion to own. Meta-owned AI startup Manus has been running undisclosed creator campaigns that sell its product as a quick path to thousands of dollars a month, according to The Verge.

Photo by Cheng Xin on Getty Images

Inside the side-hustle pitch behind a Meta-owned AI tool

The pitch is straightforward. Find a small business without a website. Use Manus to spin one up in minutes. Sell it to the owner. Collect.

One of the videos came from an account literally called "Manus AI by Meta" and described the work as something that "takes less than 10 minutes" with a "potential $5k a month," according to The Verge.

A network of near-identical accounts pushed the same script across three platforms. Many of them did not disclose any paid relationship with Manus. After The Verge reached out, several TikTok accounts came down.

Related: Meta quietly tests charging for WhatsApp features

The company's own response is the part that should make Meta investors flinch. Manus spokesperson Ronghui Li confirmed the company "works with third-party agency partners on paid UGC creator programs" and said the responsibility for disclosure rests with the creators themselves, according to The Verge.

Advertising lawyers told the publication that posture likely runs afoul of disclosure laws in multiple jurisdictions.

How Meta's $2 billion AI deal turned into a headache

Meta announced the Manus acquisition in late December 2025, valuing the startup at roughly $2 billion to $3 billion, according toBloomberg. Inside Meta's Ads Manager, a Manus integration started showing up in the Tools menu in February, per Social Media Today.

Investors looking for more context on where Meta's AI bet sits in the broader market should also see is Nvidia's AI boom already priced in, the Windows president's blunt AI message, and Michael Burry's anti-AI bet for the bear case TheStreet has been tracking.

More AI:

• Micron sits at the center of a red-hot chip rally
• IBM CEO sends blunt message on AI and quantum computing
• Anthropic CEO makes shocking admission about AI

The deal then hit a wall. China's National Development and Reform Commission ordered the parties to unwind the acquisition on April 27, citing laws and regulations without further explanation, according to CNBC.

Meta's response was carefully worded. The transaction "complied fully with applicable law," and the company "anticipates an appropriate resolution to the inquiry."

The blocked deal leaves Manus in a strange spot. Employees have already joined Meta's AI team, and backers including Tencent and HongShan Capital have already cashed out, per Fortune.

Its integration into Meta Ads Manager is live. And now the side-hustle creator network is the brand's most visible consumer marketing campaign in the U.S. and Canada.

The numbers behind Meta's AI ad gamble

Meta is pouring an extraordinary amount of money into AI infrastructure. My read of the latest guidance is simple. Any product Meta paid $2 billion for needs to start showing returns, and fast.

Here is the rough timeline of how Meta's AI play got to this week:

• December 29, 2025: Meta announced the Manus acquisition for roughly $2 billion, per Bloomberg.
• February 2026: Manus AI integration appeared inside Meta Ads Manager, according to Social Media Today.
• April 27, 2026: China's NDRC ordered the deal unwound, per CNBC.
• April 30, 2026: Meta lifted 2026 capex guidance to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, according to CNBC.
• May 2026: The Verge reported the undisclosed side-hustle creator ad network across three platforms.

JPMorgan analyst Doug Anmuth downgraded Meta to neutral from overweight on April 30 and cut his price target to $725 from $825, according to CNBC. His worry is not Meta's ad business itself, which grew 33% year over year.

The concern is whether the AI bets pay off beyond the ad stack.

"Full-stack AI competition is intensifying and Meta has a more challenging path to returns on heavy AI capex beyond advertising," Anmuth wrote in the note.

Meta shares fell more than 10% the day after earnings, wiping roughly $175 billion off the company's market value. TheStreet's own Hillary Remy laid out the full investor implications in JPMorgan's stark message for Meta investors.

What Meta's rule-breaking means for your portfolio

Here is the part that should matter to anyone holding Meta stock in a 401(k) or an Individual Retirement Account, or to anyone who clicked one of these "side hustle" videos and considered the pitch.

When I ran the math on the FTC penalty exposure, the per-violation fine sits north of $50,000, and the rule applies to every undisclosed creator post separately, per FTC enforcement guidance.

A network of even a few dozen accounts running multiple posts each can stack into millions in potential exposure quickly. The FTC has gone after Google and Teami for similar disclosure failures in the past.

For everyday consumers, the side-hustle pitch is the bigger problem.

Manus is a real AI tool. The idea that a normal person can build and sell websites for $5,000 a month with ten minutes of work, on autopilot, sits in the same category Meta's own engagement-bait policy describes as content that goes against the platform's value of authenticity.

People who buy into that pitch tend to lose time, money, or both before figuring out the math does not actually work.

For investors, the pattern is the part to track. Meta is spending up to $145 billion in 2026 to chase AI returns.

Its first big AI acquisition is now under a Chinese regulatory order to unwind, and its first big consumer marketing push for that acquisition is the kind of campaign Meta's own apps officially demote.

The next time Meta's AI strategy comes up on an earnings call, the question worth asking is not how big the capex number gets. It is whether the products that capex is funding can actually be sold without breaking the company's own rules. If Manus is the canary, the answer this week looks shaky.

Related: Mark Zuckerberg shocks Meta employees with new requirement

The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

This story was originally published May 4, 2026 at 6:33 AM.