Contributor Content

As AI Pushes Music Forward, Culture Seeks the Imperfect and Human

AI Music
Adobe Stock

“We can’t rewind, we’ve gone too far.” When Trevor Horn sang those lines in Video Killed the Radio Star in 1979, he was mourning the takeover of technology in the arts. Nearly fifty years later, the industry is humming a new chorus.

The doom-and-gloom rhetoric dominates today’s cultural conversation. People were told that artificial intelligence was the final asteroid in the extinction event prophesied by Trevor Horn, and further told that generative models and algorithmic composition would democratize creation until value ceased to exist.

AI can resurrect the voices of the dead and clone the living with terrifying precision. Viral tracks like Heart on My Sleeve fool millions into thinking Drake and The Weeknd had collaborated. AI engines can conjure fully arranged symphonies, radio-ready pop anthems, and realistic vocals from a single text prompt. The barrier to entry hasn’t just been lowered; it has indeed been obliterated.

But what is all that worth if the receiver does not value the music? People are learning, as they have many times before, that listeners don’t just consume audio frequencies; they consume the human struggle required to create them.

Why is a Van Gogh painting priceless? Clue: it isn’t because his brushstrokes are technically perfect. It’s valued it because people know the hand that held the brush was shaking. The artifact is inseparable from the artist’s struggle and story.

The same is true for music. Consider Johnny Cash’s Hurt, recorded near the end of his life. His voice is frail; it trembles, cracks, and wavers off-pitch. By the standards of a modern AI algorithm, it is technically flawed. But it is those flaws that make it a masterpiece. An AI can replicate the frequency of a deep baritone, but it cannot simulate the weight of a life coming to an end.

This does not mean the technology is without merit; it simply necessitates a new categorization. Throughout history, great artists have leveraged technology, from the synthesizer to the sampler, to spark inspiration for what’s possible.

Surely, the act of writing became easier with the word processor, but the machine did not invent the plot. Similarly, AI will make mindful artists more prolific by removing the friction between the spark of an idea and its execution.

The best creators are those who utilize what’s available to them. Fifty years ago, that meant Stevie Wonder embracing the synthesizer, a machine critics at the time called soulless, to compose symphonies from a keyboard.

Today, that same spirit is found in the professional reliance on royalty-free music around the globe. High-quality royalty-free catalogues have served as the backbone for the creator economy for years, enabling independent artists to score films and podcasts with orchestral elements that would otherwise be difficult or costly to record live. Many commercially successful tracks, including some award-winning releases, make use of royalty-free loops and samples as part of their production process.

Prompting an AI to write the whole song versus using it as a collaborative tool, just as synthesizers and royalty-free assets have been leveraged, it marks a massive difference; one approach asks the machine to be the artist; the other simply asks it to be the clay.

People will always respect the latter.

In cities such as Stockholm, London or Tokyo, record stores remain oriented toward physical releases and artist-led work, rather than AI-generated MP3 downloads. You will see them buying vinyl. You will see them hunting for cassette tapes. They are searching for the fingerprints in the clay, the undeniable, physical proof that a human hand was at the wheel.

This behavior is not a regression; it is a correction. The AI asteroid didn’t wipe civilization out; it just cleared the atmosphere, forcing people to stop trying to be machines and remember how to be artists.

Members of the editorial and news staff of miamiherald.com were not involved with the creation of this content. All contributor content is reviewed by miamiherald.com staff.

Follow More of Our Reporting on

William Jones
Contributor
William Jones is a writer who has worked in a variety of professional roles. From crafting criticism and film analysis for outlets such as WhatCulture, Comic Book Resources, and Ratings Game Music, to writing acclaimed scripts for various YouTube channels and audio streaming service Headfone, he has done a little bit of everything.
Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER