Miami Herald Logo

How to pay for health care reform? Maybe these new taxes | Miami Herald

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Site Information
    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Herald Store
    • RSS Feeds
    • Special Sections
    • Advertise
    • Advertise with Us
    • Media Kit
    • Mobile
    • Mobile Apps & eReaders
    • Newsletters
    • Social
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google+
    • Instagram
    • YouTube

    • Sections
    • News
    • South Florida
    • Miami-Dade
    • Broward
    • Florida Keys
    • Florida
    • Politics
    • Weird News
    • Weather
    • National & World
    • Colombia
    • National
    • World
    • Americas
    • Cuba
    • Guantánamo
    • Haiti
    • Venezuela
    • Local Issues
    • Crime
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health Care
    • In Depth
    • Issues & Ideas
    • Traffic
    • Sections
    • Sports
    • Blogs & Columnists
    • Pro & College
    • Miami Dolphins
    • Miami Heat
    • Miami Marlins
    • Florida Panthers
    • College Sports
    • University of Miami
    • Florida International
    • University of Florida
    • Florida State University
    • More Sports
    • High School Sports
    • Auto Racing
    • Fighting
    • Golf
    • Horse Racing
    • Outdoors
    • Soccer
    • Tennis
    • Youth Sports
    • Other Sports
    • Politics
    • Elections
    • The Florida Influencer Series
    • Sections
    • Business
    • Business Monday
    • Banking
    • International Business
    • National Business
    • Personal Finance
    • Real Estate News
    • Small Business
    • Technology
    • Tourism & Cruises
    • Workplace
    • Business Plan Challenge
    • Blogs & Columnists
    • Cindy Krischer Goodman
    • The Starting Gate
    • Work/Life Balancing Act
    • Movers
    • Sections
    • Living
    • Advice
    • Fashion
    • Food & Drink
    • Health & Fitness
    • Home & Garden
    • Pets
    • Recipes
    • Travel
    • Wine
    • Blogs & Columnists
    • Dave Barry
    • Ana Veciana-Suarez
    • Flashback Miami
    • More Living
    • LGBTQ South Florida
    • Palette Magazine
    • Indulge Magazine
    • South Florida Album
    • Broward Album
    • Sections
    • Entertainment
    • Books
    • Comics
    • Games & Puzzles
    • Horoscopes
    • Movies
    • Music & Nightlife
    • People
    • Performing Arts
    • Restaurants
    • TV
    • Visual Arts
    • Blogs & Columnists
    • Jose Lambiet
    • Lesley Abravanel
    • More Entertainment
    • Events Calendar
    • Miami.com
    • Contests & Promotions
    • Sections
    • All Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Op-Ed
    • Editorial Cartoons
    • Jim Morin
    • Letters to the Editor
    • From Our Inbox
    • Speak Up
    • Submit a Letter
    • Meet the Editorial Board
    • Influencers Opinion
    • Blogs & Columnists
    • Blog Directory
    • Columnist Directory
    • Andres Oppenheimer
    • Carl Hiaasen
    • Leonard Pitts Jr.
    • Fabiola Santiago
    • Obituaries
    • Obituaries in the News
    • Place an Obituary

    • Place an ad
    • All Classifieds
    • Announcements
    • Apartments
    • Auctions/Sales
    • Automotive
    • Commercial Real Estate
    • Employment
    • Garage Sales
    • Legals
    • Merchandise
    • Obituaries
    • Pets
    • Public Notices
    • Real Estate
    • Services
  • Public Notices
  • Cars
  • Jobs
  • Moonlighting
  • Real Estate
  • Mobile & Apps

  • el Nuevo Herald
  • Miami.com
  • Indulge

Politics

How to pay for health care reform? Maybe these new taxes

Jenny Gold, Eric Pianin and Julie Appleby

    ORDER REPRINT →

June 23, 2009 05:09 PM

WASHINGTON — Democratic leaders, worried that high price tags might derail their health care plans, are looking at a raft of ideas both old and new to salvage their legislation. Each proposal carries risks of its own, however, lawmakers and outside experts said.

Democrats in the House of Representatives, for example, acknowledge that they're looking at a value-added tax, which is used widely in Europe but has never gone anywhere in the U.S. Also on the table are a 2 percent surtax on the income of the wealthy and a hike in taxes on sodas.

"The average American is already worried about government intrusion," said Mark V. Pauly, an economist at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and the soda tax "sounds like the school nurse."

Rep. Robert Andrews, D-N.J., the chairman of an Education and Labor subcommittee, acknowledged, "Every revenue raiser is something someone doesn't like." He added, however, "What we're going to have to find is the right, equitable mix of policy and politics to get this done."

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to the Miami Herald

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

In the Senate, Democrats are scrambling to shrink the Finance Committee's legislation after a preliminary estimate from the Congressional Budget Office put the bill's cost at $1.6 trillion over 10 years. They're scaling back subsidies for families to buy insurance, one of the most expensive parts of the bill. Lawmakers in both chambers are trying to bring their bills' price tags to below $1 trillion over 10 years.

Besides considering new taxes and scaled-back subsidies, lawmakers are turning to employers to help pay for the costs of insuring their workers.

Here's a rundown of some of the ways they're trying to crack the cost problem:

VALUE-ADDED TAX

The value-added tax, which taxes goods at each stage of production, has been floating around as a potential revenue raiser for decades. However, it's been considered radioactive since House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Al Ullman, D-Ore., was defeated in 1980 after talking up the levy. The VAT, which is essentially a consumption tax, is regressive, which means it hits lower-income people harder than upper-income people, making it unpopular among liberal economists and labor and consumer groups.

Nevertheless, the VAT has gotten a lot of attention from academia and research centers as a funder of a health care overhaul, and it has some influential proponents.

Ezekiel J. Emanuel, a special adviser for health policy in the Office of Management and Budget, has written favorably about using a VAT tax to finance a health care overhaul. He's the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Leonard Burman, the director of the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution, also has advocated a VAT tax.

A value-added tax of 1 percent to 1.5 percent could raise $600 billion over 10 years, according to estimates that are circulating on Capitol Hill. If necessities such as housing, education and medical care were exempted to soften the blow for lower-income people, then the rate might have to increase slightly to raise the same amount.

Many are skeptical that Congress would ever approve a VAT.

Jonathan Oberlander, who teaches health policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said he'd be surprised if the VAT made the final cut of revenue raisers. "Health care reform has enough problems as it is without taking on the VAT," he said. Still, he said, at this point in the process, "It's basically a question of which poison or poisons do you want to drink?"

SURTAX ON THE WEALTHY

The Ways and Means panel also is discussing a 2 percent surtax on the incomes of the wealthy. Such a surtax would target taxpayers who earn more than $200,000 annually or households that earn more than $250,000. It would raise an estimated $256 billion over a decade, according to the estimates floating on Capitol Hill. Unlike some of the other tax proposals on the table, this one would meet President Barack Obama's campaign promise of no new taxes for Americans who earn less than $200,000 a year.

Oberlander said that a surtax was the "most straightforward way to finance reform from a Democratic perspective," although it opens Democrats up to accusations of "class warfare."

Pauly agreed that such a surtax is "probably the way you have to go," but added that it wouldn't raise enough money. "You have to be honest and say if we're going to have to go down the income distribution to get the money," he said.

MEDICARE PAYROLL TAX INCREASE

Another possibility: increasing the Medicare payroll tax, which the employer and the employee pay. An increase of 0.65 percentage point would raise $600 billion over a decade, according to the estimates.

'SIN' TAX

Some economists support another idea that's under consideration: raising "sin taxes." Such penalties, they say, could help discourage unhealthy behavior.

Jonathan Gruber, a professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said he preferred sin taxes to a VAT or payroll tax. In addition, he'd rather see a tax on alcohol than on sodas.

Still, he said, the revenue from sin taxes would be relatively small and wouldn't rise with the cost of health care. Overall, he hopes that a health care overhaul is financed primarily by making changes in the health care system and by taxing employer-provided health benefits, as well imposing a sin tax.

EMPLOYERS

Lawmakers in the House and the Senate are looking to employers to help pay for revamping health care, but they're going about it in different ways. House Democrats, in a draft released Friday, proposed an 8 percent payroll tax on employers who don't offer insurance. Some small businesses would be exempt.

A Senate Finance Committee outline that leaked last week details a variety of options for employers, including one that doesn't require them to offer coverage. In that case, they'd be required to shoulder half the cost if their workers ended up on Medicaid, the state-federal program for the poor, or 100 percent of the cost if their employees received tax credits to subsidize buying insurance through newly created exchanges.

The provision is designed to assuage critics, who say that, given the chance, some employers would simply shift the responsibility for their employees' insurance to the federal government.

The amount of the potential Medicaid charge isn't spelled out, but in 2006 the annual average Medicaid cost per adult was figured at about $2,100, according to the Urban Institute and the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. (The commission, like Kaiser Health News, is part of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan research organization.)

"They're saying, if you shift your employees onto us (the government health plans), you'll still have to pay for them," said Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute, a nonpartisan research organization in Washington.

Requiring employers to help finance Medicaid and the tax credits helps solve the financing problem, but it mainly affects companies with low-income workers, raising concerns that it will discourage their hiring.

"It will affect their decision to hire," said James Gelfand, senior manager of health policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. "If they need to hire a janitor or a salesclerk, in addition to paying them $7 an hour, they're going to have to assume they will have to pay these other costs."

Other options in the Finance Committee document include imposing a penalty on employers who don't offer insurance. "The Finance bill is still a work in progress," said Frank McArdle, who heads the Washington office of the benefits firm Hewitt Associates. "They're trying to find a way of keeping employers in the game of providing health care coverage without having an exodus from employer plans."

INSURANCE SUBSIDIES

To lower the cost of its bill, the Finance Committee is ratcheting back the government subsidies that would be available to moderate-income families and older people to purchase insurance in the proposed exchanges.

Last November, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the committee's chairman, recommended that tax credits be provided to people with incomes up to four times the federal poverty level, or $43,000 for individuals and $88,000 for a family of four. However, the committee's draft would limit the subsidies to those with incomes that are no more than three times the poverty level: single people who make $33,000 a year and families that earn $66,000. The House Democrats' bill also would limit the subsidy to those with incomes at three times the poverty line.

By lowering the threshold in that manner, lawmakers might leave out about 4.6 million people, Urban Institute researcher John F. Holahan said.

Three times the poverty level is too low, said Judith Solomon, a senior fellow in health policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a policy research center. "I would say the top income levels for the subsidies should be set high enough to make sure everyone can afford coverage."

(Chris Weaver and Mary Agnes Carey of Kaiser Health News contributed to this story.) (Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy-research organization that isn't affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.)

MORE FROM KAISER HEALTH NEWS

Coverage of the nation's health care debate

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Kaiser Health News on McClatchy

Health overhaul hard enough, but then there's paying for it

Obama signs law on tobacco products

Congress stuffs war-funding bill with cash for other items

Agents say DEA is forcing them illegally to work in Afghanistan

Check out McClatchy's politics blog: Planet Washington

  Comments  

Videos

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis wants statewide grand jury into school security across state

Who is Amy Klobuchar? | 2020 presidential candidate

View More Video

Trending Stories

Haitian police arrest five Americans who claimed they were on a ‘government mission’

February 18, 2019 06:37 PM

Man arrested after climbing crane near FIU to ask Trump for mercy for Cuban exile bomber

February 18, 2019 08:44 AM

A Florida 6th-grader called the Pledge of Allegiance ‘racist.’ Then he got arrested.

February 18, 2019 08:59 AM

Double vision: Miami will host Miami in future football game

February 18, 2019 06:36 PM

Here’s why the Dolphins will avoid dummies more than ever. And coaches weigh in on new QB

February 18, 2019 02:07 PM

Read Next

The Latest: Chicago judge OKs Obama library lawsuit

Nation & World

The Latest: Chicago judge OKs Obama library lawsuit

The Associated Press

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 19, 2019 03:07 PM

A judge has given the green light to a lawsuit that aims to stop Barack Obama's $500 million presidential center from being built in a Chicago park beside Lake Michigan.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to the Miami Herald

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE POLITICS

‘It is time to complete that revolution’: Sanders says he’s running for president

Politics

‘It is time to complete that revolution’: Sanders says he’s running for president

February 19, 2019 07:00 AM
West Virginia House tables bill that prompted teacher strike

Nation & World

West Virginia House tables bill that prompted teacher strike

February 19, 2019 02:29 PM
Governor signs measure to hike Illinois minimum wage to $15

Business

Governor signs measure to hike Illinois minimum wage to $15

February 19, 2019 01:32 PM
French police kill suspect after knife attack in Marseille

Nation & World

French police kill suspect after knife attack in Marseille

February 19, 2019 01:27 PM

Politics

Stacey Abrams: ‘Incompetence’ led to voting rights suppression effort

February 19, 2019 10:20 AM

Nation & World

The Latest: Georgia voting problems highlighted at hearing

February 19, 2019 03:51 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

Miami Herald App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Public Insight Network
  • Reader Panel
Advertising
  • Place a Classified
  • Media Kit
  • Commercial Printing
  • Public Notices
Copyright
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story