Sources: SI to publish tell-all report on NCAA’s UM probe
Sources said Sports Illustrated will reveal, among other things, that Nevin Shapiro used inside information from UM coaches to gamble.
06/09/2013 12:01 AM
06/09/2013 12:49 AM
With the University of Miami just days away from its hearing in front of the NCAA’s infractions committee, two sources confirmed to The Miami Herald that Sports Illustrated is in the final stages of writing an exposé about the NCAA and its investigation into the school’s athletics program, including not-previously-published allegations from former UM booster Nevin Shapiro.
Shapiro told SI that he used inside information obtained from UM coaches to gamble on Hurricanes football games, according to the sources.
Shapiro alleged that coaches shared with him information — such as whether a particular injured player would be available to play — in at least two games, including in 2005 and a 2007 game against North Carolina, which UM lost 33-27.
According to a third source, the NCAA previously investigated Shapiro’s gambling claims but found no concrete evidence and did not make any allegations regarding gambling in UM’s Notice Of Allegations.
That frustrated Shapiro, who believed the NCAA did not adequately investigate his claims involving the matter.
In general, any school and involved coaches might be at risk of NCAA punishment if it was determined that they gave inside information to a booster with the knowledge it would be used for gambling purposes.
Shapiro was friendly with several former UM assistants, but it’s unclear which, if any, of the coaches will be named by Sports Illustrated.
It’s also unclear how the release of the story would affect the case, if at all. The NCAA might choose to ignore the SI report. Reopening the investigation would seem unlikely, because the NCAA already has explored the gambling allegations and found nothing.
Shapiro had a serious gambling problem — he has said he lost $9 million gambling on sports. He paid substantial fees to a high-profile South Florida sports handicapper, Adam Meyer, for his advice on game picks.
Last year, Meyer agreed to return $900,000 in payments from Shapiro to a bankruptcy court trustee seeking to repay Shapiro’s investment victims, according to public records.
A UM contingent led by president Donna Shalala will appear before the infractions committee on Thursday through Saturday in Indianapolis. During the hearing, UM will defend itself and answer questions from the eight committee members hearing the case.
Five former UM coaches — Clint Hurtt and Aubrey Hill (football) and Frank Haith, Jorge Fernandez and Jake Morton (basketball) — also will be in attendance with their attorneys to respond to the NCAA’s charges against them.
UM, which already has self-imposed two football bowl bans, expects to learn later this summer or fall whether it will receive additional sanctions. After a hearing, the NCAA typically takes anytime between six weeks and four months before issuing sanctions.
Shapiro, serving a 20-year sentence for running a $930 million Ponzi scheme, told The Miami Herald last month that he would soon unleash a “Category 5 tsunami” against UM and implied he would make new allegations.
UM has been skeptical that he would cause the program any additional harm, based on the belief that he told the NCAA everything he had to tell in 2011 and 2012.
Before going to the NCAA with dozens of allegations against UM in March 2011, Shapiro said he was angry that numerous UM people — including coaches and players — turned their backs on him after he was arrested.
“I can assure you that this will not be the last of this story from my end,” Shapiro told The Miami Herald recently, declining to discuss the allegations he shared with Sports Illustrated.
Miami Herald reporter Jay Weaver contributed to this report.
Join the Discussion
Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.