Linda Robertson: Gun culture a needless part of sports
12/05/2012 12:01 AM
12/05/2012 6:35 AM
Javon Belcher killed his girlfriend, committed suicide and orphaned his daughter. If the Kansas City linebacker had not put a gun in his hand during those moments when he was seized by rage and despair, the 3-month-old baby girl would have had a chance to grow up with her mother and father.
Now she has no chance. She is another innocent victim damaged by the gun culture that has ensnared too many athletes. We are saddened by such senseless tragedy but no longer shocked. The precedents are numerous: Junior Seau, Dave Duerson and Mike Flanagan killed themselves. Jayson Williams carelessly killed his driver. Rae Carruth paid a hit man to shoot his pregnant girlfriend; she died, the baby boy – brain-damaged by a lack of oxygen – survived and is being raised by his grandmother. Sports’ strong men needed only the twitch of a finger to pull the trigger in a heartbeat of weakness.
The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence on Monday re-released its July 2012 study entitled “Guns in Sports: How Guns Have Affected the Athletic Community and What It Tells Us About America’s Gun Crisis.”
The report contains 100 narratives on athletes who have killed themselves, killed others or been killed. And that doesn’t include all the close calls, life-altering injuries, prison sentences.
Each case contains its own awful details. It’s difficult to shunt them into categories or label them with statistics. But they do have one single thing in common: Guns.
Former NFL coach Tony Dungy, who lost a son to suicide, recalled addressing his Colts players. When asked how many possessed guns, three quarters raised their hands.
What compels pro athletes to be gun owners in disproportionate numbers? Why did Plaxico Burress feel he needed to carry a gun to a nightclub? And if he did, why go there in the first place? Why did Gilbert Arenas bring a gun into the locker room?
Suddenly fabulously wealthy and famous, young athletes can’t resist the lure of gun culture. Guns afford them security and status – ironically, the very things they have achieved by becoming the top 1 percent of 1 percent in their field. Some feel they are targets for troublemakers and thieves and need protection. A gun is a macho badge of badness – seemingly redundant for intimidating superheroes.
The right to bear arms has been a delicate issue since the United States was created by revolution. How far does that right extend? To the mentally impaired? To those who get drunk or high? To someone standing his ground? To people who buy guns on the illegal market or who avoid background checks or leave guns lying around a house with children? To people who want to own assault weapons?
One school of thought: Guns don’t kill; people do. They would argue that Sean Taylor, Steve McNair, Hector “Macho” Camacho and Belcher’s girlfriend could have survived if they shot their killers first.
Here’s the counter argument, backed by data: People are far less likely to kill if they don’t have a gun in their hands. Only 10 percent of suicide attempts with guns are not fatal.
Guns don’t kill but gun owners do. Gun ownership in the U.S. – 200 million firearms -- is insanely out of whack compared to other nations. So, it follows, is the number of people shot with a gun every year – 100,000. So, it follows, is the population behind bars. We've got 3 million people serving time, giving rise to a prison industry that now dwarfs many manufacturing sectors. Coming soon to a neighborhood near you: A large storage facility enclosed by barbed wire – for human beings.
Columbine High, Virginia Tech, Arizona, the sniper in Washington, D.C., the crazed Joker opening fire at the Batman movie, drive-by sprays – what once seemed unthinkable happens with regularity in the land of the free and the home of the brave.
South Florida is one of the capitals of gun violence. Last week a little girl boarded her school bus and never came home. She was accidentally shot by a boy showing off a gun in his backpack.
Brady Center president Dan Gross said the Belcher case illustrates what happens in everyday instances of domestic violence, arguments and suicide attempts when “someone introduced a handgun into the equation.” Deaths might have been averted if a gun was not present; tempers and emotions might have had those extra minutes to cool instead of escalate.
“This isn’t a debate about the Second Amendment,” Gross said. “That has been decided by the Supreme Court. It is about all of us, as a nation, coming together to say we are better than this, and having an honest conversation about the risks and dangers that guns pose and what we can do to prevent tragedies.”
Conservative commentators who chastised Bob Costas and Jason Whitlock for speaking out on gun violence should be chastised for an absolutist stance on an issue that deserves more dialogue, not less. If you’re going to wave the flag, you have to support the First Amendment, too.
Perhaps nothing would have stopped Belcher, 25, who kissed his dying girlfriend and apologized to his mother at home, then drove to Chiefs headquarters, said “Guys, I have to do this,” and shot himself in the head. But, had he not been clutching a gun, the coaches talking to him in the parking lot might have found a way to dissuade him. The relationship counselor working with him and Kasandra Perkins might have had another session with him.
Athletes who understand their outsized stature as role models encourage kids to stay in school. They warn people not to drink and drive. Say no to drugs. Get fit. Don’t discriminate against minorities.
In other words, be responsible, use your brain, respect your fellow man. The pain wrought by bullets is irreversible. Now it is time for athletes to lend their voices to the gun control debate. Before another child loses her parents.
Oops, you haven't selected any newsletters. Please check the box next to one or more of our email newsletters and submit again.
Oops, you didn't provide a valid email address. Please double-check the email field and submit again.
Join the Discussion
Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.