Last month, Florida's Third District Court of Appeal heard the state's appeal of the victory the ACLU achieved last November when the Miami-Dade Circuit Court struck down Florida's ban on adoptions by gay men and lesbians.

With approximately 3,500 children languishing in the state's foster care system, the issue before the court was whether the law can deny a child a safe, secure and permanent home because of the sexual orientation of the adoptive parent.

But there was another issue facing the court: How bad does a law have to be and still survive a court challenge? We all know that the Legislature sometimes passes bad laws, but should policies that are based on prejudice and stereotypes that masquerade as science survive as law in Florida?

Children trapped in Florida's foster care system have been held hostage to ugly anti-gay prejudice for far too long. The ACLU has been challenging this policy for years, and we have urged the Legislature to repeal the law so judges are allowed to make decisions based on the best interests of children.

A landmark ruling

We achieved a landmark victory on Nov. 25, 2008, when the 11th Circuit Court granted an adoption to Martin Gill, a gay man who has been raising two foster children since 2004. Martin and his partner were planning to relocate out of state until they were asked by the Department of Children & Families to care for two terribly neglected young brothers. The state brought the children, malnourished and infested with lice, to the Gill home. Since 2004, Gill and his partner have provided the boys with the only safe and stable home they have ever known.

When Gill later applied to adopt the boys his application was denied by DCF officials, who based their decision solely on the 1977 Anita Bryant-inspired ban. Florida continues to be the only state to ban adoption by qualified gays and lesbians. The ACLU sued on Gill's behalf and in a reasoned decision Circuit Court Judge Cindy Lederman granted the adoption.

Judge Lederman ruled that the ban violated the equal protection guarantees of the state Constitution because it treats differently, for no rational reason, gay people and the children they raise. The court also found that the ban denies children the right to permanency in violation of the due process clause of the Florida Constitution and the federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997.

The judge's decision came after a four-day trial during which the court heard from the foremost experts on children's health and development and listened to the justifications offered by the state for the ban.

Lederman rejected the false assumptions and stereotypes about gay people presented by the state and instead credited the many reports and studies that find no differences in parenting by gays and non-gays or the adjustment of their children.

Lederman held that ``[t]hese conclusions have been accepted, adopted and ratified by the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatry Association, the American Pediatric Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Child Welfare League of America and the National Association of Social Workers. As a result, based on the robust nature of the evidence available in the field, this court is satisfied that the issue is so far beyond dispute that it would be irrational to hold otherwise; the best interests of children are not preserved by prohibiting homosexual adoption.'' The state immediately appealed, and now the case is before the intermediate appellate court. This is likely not the end of the battle, as this case will probably land in the lap of the Florida Supreme Court.

And while it is important to win legal battles, it is equally important to change hearts and minds and debunk myths and prejudices so that our victories in court are sustainable and enduring. This saga shows how much easier it is in Florida to enact bad legislation than to repeal bad laws.

Repeal the law

Wiping this law off the books, whether by the courts or the Legislature, would help provide more children with permanent, loving and stable families.

For the past 30 years, state officials have tried to defend a law that did little more than give vent to prejudices, but is now repudiated by every professional organization with expertise in the rearing of healthy children.

For the last five years, Martin Gill has provided a nurturing home for two neglected brothers who are now thriving.

I know which side should prevail in this battle.

Howard Simon is executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida.

Join the discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. In order to post comments, you must be a registered user of MiamiHerald.com. Your username will show along with the comments you post. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

     Showing: Oldest first Newest first Most-recommended first Least-recommended first

@Nyx.AuthorDisplayName@ wrote on @Nyx.PostedAtTime@:

@Nyx.repliedToText@

@Nyx.replyAnswerText@

Reply to this Comment @Nyx.Recommender@ @Nyx.AbuseReporter@