Supreme Court ruling misrepresented
07/05/2014 7:00 PM
07/04/2014 3:09 PM
Between the July 1editorial and Leonard Pitts' July 2 column on the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling regarding health insurance for women, one would think all rights were stripped away from women. The Herald and Pitts should be ashamed for taking the stance that women's health is now in danger. No, it is not!
The Supreme Court ruling does not prevent women from getting contraceptives. How dare you print headlines, A big step back and Bad day for women's rights, reproductive health. No logical person believes that. Women can still get contraceptives if their employer refuses to pay for them on religious grounds. And, if women are so worried about paying for it, here is a another solution: Don't have unprotected sex!
It’s puzzling why liberals believe that this ruling takes away rights. They believe that if something isn’t paid for by someone other than themselves, rights are taken away.
James Harrison, Miami
Oops, you haven't selected any newsletters. Please check the box next to one or more of our email newsletters and submit again.
Oops, you didn't provide a valid email address. Please double-check the email field and submit again.
Join the Discussion
Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.