Genting dollars fuel possible ballot drive

A political action committee linked to the Genting Group has spent nearly $600,000 on what appears to be an effort to put a constitutional amendment for casino gambling on the ballot in 2014.

07/13/2012 5:00 AM

08/19/2014 6:11 PM

Genting Group appears to be intensifying its push to allow voters to make the final decision on whether Las-Vegas style gambling comes to South Florida.

Recently released financing reports show a political action group linked to the Malaysia-based conglomerate is spending big on an apparent campaign to get voters to approve a constitutional amendment in favor of resort-style casinos.

The gaming giant failed to win legislative approval from lawmakers earlier this year, despite spending millions of dollars on lobbying and campaign contributions. Now a Genting-linked political committee — New Jobs and Revenue For Florida — is directing funds towards a potential 2014 voter petition drive, which could offer an alternative path to accomplishing the goal of building multi-billion-dollar casino resorts in South Florida.

"New Jobs and Revenue for Florida is an exploratory effort to consider whether or not there are ways to have more entertainment options in Florida,” said committee spokesperson Brian Hughes.

Campaign finance records show the political action committee spent nearly $600,000 in the last three months on voter-petition consultants, constitutional scholars and pollsters who have worked for Gov. Rick Scott.

The spending included $50,000 to Nation Voter Outreach, a Nevada-based political consulting firm that, according to its website, specializes in “organizing signature drives to qualify issues and candidates for the ballot.”

Genting also directed $200,000 to Bruce Rogow, a constitutional scholar and Fort Lauderdale-based lawyer who worked on the 2004 constitutional amendment approving slots in South Florida. Another $350,000 went to Fabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates, a political consulting company headed up by Scott’s strategist, Tony Fabrizio.

Genting’s Miami-based subsidiary stopped short of saying a petition drive was in the works.

“Our contribution to New Jobs and Revenue for Florida is simply one more example of our commitment to exploring how to enhance entertainment and hospitality choices here,” Resorts World Miami spokesman Corey Tilley said in a statement on Friday.

But critics of casino gaming said it’s clear that Genting is trying to take the issue directly to voters in 2014.

“This is the first time that Genting’s true ambitions are being revealed,’ said Dan Gelber, a former Democratic state senator from Miami Beach. “And they’re trying to get a change to the state Constitution.”

Brad Swanson, of the Florida Chamber of Commerce, called the push for a constitutional amendment an “assault.”

The Chamber, a powerful business group in Tallahassee, came out strongly against Genting’s plans during this year’s legislative session.

In Florida, an organization has to get signatures from eight percent of the voters in the last presidential election in order to put a constitutional amendment on the ballot. After completing that hurdle, a proposal must be approved by 60 percent of the voters in order to become law.

Recent polls show strong support for casino gambling in South Florida, but plenty of skepticism in other parts of the state.

Three other times when casino initiatives made it onto the ballot — in 1978, 1986 and in 1994 — voters blocked the effort. Slots in Miami-Dade and Broward counties were approved in 2004.

“Florida voters have seen this issue before and they have rejected it consistently,” said Swanson. “We believe the Florida voters are smart on issues such as gambling and ultimately they’ll make the right decision.”

Genting has said the luxury casinos would bring billions of dollars of revenue into the state and help jumpstart the economy with thousands of new jobs.

“Job creation and expanding economic opportunity for the people of Florida are goals we are proud to support,” said Tilley.

Join the Discussion

Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service