LONDON -- A British court on Friday gave Foreign Secretary David Miliband a week to justify his decision to suppress secret documents that lawyers for a Guantánamo detainee argue could prove their client was tortured in Morocco.

The High Court ruling came in the case of Binyam Mohamed, a 30-year-old British resident who was captured in Pakistan in April 2002 and is accused by the United States of conspiring with al Qaeda leaders to attack civilians. Mohamed's lawyers argue that the British government is withholding information about his treatment which is critical to his hope of receiving a fair trial.

Mohamed claims he spent 18 months in Morocco and was tortured before ultimately being transferred to the U.S. Navy base in southeast Cuba in 2004.

Because Mohamed was interviewed by British intelligence while in Pakistan, his attorneys sued the British government for access to records which they say could show he was mistreated. They sought 44 documents containing shared U.S. and British intelligence pertaining to their client, claiming they could shed light on his condition in captivity and under what circumstances he was moved to Morocco.

Miliband had said the documents should not be released for reasons of national security, arguing that to release them without U.S. permission would wreck intelligence-sharing with the United States. But the court ruled that Miliband's argument was incomplete because he did not show that the torture allegation was considered when he outlined his reasoning for withholding the documents.

Miliband now has until Sept. 5 to come up with a more compelling argument for keeping the documents secret, the court said.

According to Mohamed's account, filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, torturers sliced his penis with a scalpel and threatened to sever his private parts. Mohamed claims he was beaten, deprived of sleep and given mind-altering drugs.

U.S. authorities have yet to decide whether to try him.

Any evidence that Britain had knowledge of, or cooperated in, the torture of a British resident would be deeply embarrassing for the government, which is party to the Geneva Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights, both of which bar the practice.

Proof of torture could also hamper prosecution of his case should he face trial at Guantánamo. Evidence extracted under torture is inadmissible under the rules governing military tribunals.

The U.S. State Department sent a letter to the court promising to hand the documents to Mohamed's lawyers should he ever be charged -- with some important strings attached. The documents can only be seen by two members of Mohamed's legal team, and names and locations carried in the documents will be blotted out.

But the human rights group, Reprieve, said the U.S. promise did not go far enough.

'We want the documents now so that we can argue that the `trial' should not go ahead,'' said Clare Algar, Reprieve's executive director. She also argued that the redaction of the names of U.S. and British personnel from the documents would hobble Mohamed's defense because it would make it impossible to call them as witnesses.

A Pentagon spokesman, Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon, refused to comment on the accusations of torture, saying: ``we're not going to discuss these allegations in a public forum.''

In any case, the promised disclosure is routine for such trials. Lawyers for several detainees at Guantánamo have been given documents which they have used to argue for their clients' innocence.

While the British government has been spared the embarrassment of having to divulge intelligence information gathered with the help of its American ally -- at least for now -- the court could still try to drag the documents from the government directly.

A Foreign Office spokesman said the government was examining its legal options. He spoke on condition of anonymity in line with department policy.

Join the discussion

Note: If this is your first time using our NEW commenting system, you will have to LOG OUT and then LOG BACK IN.

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. In order to post comments, you must be a registered user of MiamiHerald.com. Your username will show along with the comments you post. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

     Showing: Oldest first Newest first Most-recommended first Least-recommended first

@Nyx.AuthorDisplayName@ wrote on @Nyx.PostedAtTime@:

@Nyx.CommentBody@

@Nyx.Recommender@ @Nyx.AbuseReporter@