Miami has been heading toward a transportation crisis for decades. We thrive on an economy driven by international business and tourism. But the forces that propel economic growth also conflict with outdated infrastructure. More than half of Miami hotel patrons’ complaints are about traffic and a lack of transportation options.
South Florida residents spend 141 million hours in traffic yearly —wasting $3.3 billion in fuel and time. More cars are an unsustainable solution — environmentally and economically. In order to make transportation in South Florida work for residents and visitors alike, flexibility and sustainability are key. More options like Lyft’s ridesharing platform will help us tackle a critical mobility need in South Florida through an innovative, affordable and safe community-based “transportation network.”
Mayor Gimenez supports Lyft in Miami, and is currently working with his administration and county commissioners to ensure that Miami-Dade County regulations move into the 21st century. The cities of Miami and Miami Beach have also urged the county to support Lyft.
The available modes of transportation in our community are inadequate and insufficient to fully address or tackle growing and changing needs of residents. Nearly 65 percent of residents refuse to use public transportation because it will not get them where they need to go, while 55 percent will not use it because the commute takes too long.
Unfortunately, our urban landscape reinforces vehicle dependency. It is no surprise that reliance on cars has continued to grow: The total number of miles driven in Miami-Dade has risen by more than 33 percent in a decade. This stands in contrast to the national trend away from driving and toward improved transportation.
The immediate common-sense solution for our transportation challenges lies in unlocking the 80 percent of seats already on our roads that are empty. More than 30 percent of residents are willing to rideshare, yet regulators who encourage carpooling are now challenging ridesharing solutions.
Our community cannot afford higher taxes for a comprehensive overhaul of its outdated public transportation system. Eleven years ago, the People’s Transportation Plan imposed a tax to extend Metrorail and bus lines — instead, the tax is funding existing transit operations.
Meanwhile, owning and operating a vehicle is the second highest expense in American households, at an average of $9,000 per year. The innovation that drives economic empowerment across the country has brought about a paradigm shift in the way we can and should envision transportation: Getting a ride is now cheap, safe and more efficient. Using Lyft, we can empower our community through technology and solve transportation issues with cars that are already on the road.
However, some seek to protect established interests at the expense of greater consumer freedom and choice and have not received Lyft warmly in Miami. Regulators are trying to force Lyft and other platforms into outdated legal frameworks that do not accommodate changing technology and transportation needs. Despite safely operating with enthusiastic support in more than 65 cities, Lyft has been unfairly labeled as unregulated and unaccountable. All one needs to do is look at strong regulatory environments in California, Colorado and Washington, D.C., to understand that fresh regulatory approaches can deliver safe and dependable transportation.
On requesting a Lyft, a passenger is provided with the driver’s name, image and information about his or her thoroughly inspected vehicle. Lyft drivers undergo extensive background checks — more rigorous than those required for taxis — and are subject to real-time feedback that ensures passengers and drivers abide by all rules.
Despite regulatory naysayers, opinion polls show that 2,432 high-quality voters support Lyft across the board:
Voters are united in their support for Lyft as a safe transportation solution. No single approach to transportation can serve Miami’s expanding needs, but innovations such as Lyft serve an important function in a community that values progress and choice. Not only is the opposition to Lyft founded on a desperate attempt to protect an industry that refuses to change, it also ignores strong demand from residents and visitors for a community-oriented transportation solution.
With the existence of varied modes of transportation, residents actually become more likely to consider the options available to them. Since Lyft’s Seattle launch, taxi and black-car industries have seen their most successful year ever — thriving in a competitive and booming market. Ridesharing is starting the transportation revolution that we have all been waiting for. Why stand in the way of progress?