KSM, 4 others to face murder charges again in Guantánamo
The Pentagon brings the five long-held accused architects of the Sept. 11 terror attacks to the Guantánamo war court on Saturday to face charges that seek the death penalty.
05/01/2012 5:00 AM
11/28/2012 8:27 AM
The ringleader is the U.S.-educated one-time chief of al-Qaida operations who bragged that he was responsible for the Sept. 11 terror attacks “from A to Z.” He was held for years in CIA detention, where agents waterboarded him 183 times.
The others include a one-legged militant, a self-described wannabe 9/11 hijacker, a money manager and the mastermind’s nephew, who has introduced himself in court as a Microsoft-certified software engineer.
All five are being brought to the Guantánamo war court Saturday to face arraignment as the architects of the worst terror attack on American soil in U.S. history.
And if that all sounds familiar, it is, because, yes, we’ve been here before.
The Pentagon is resetting the clock and restarting the Sept. 11 terror trial of Khalid Sheik Mohammed, 46, and four alleged accomplices, seeking to write the final chapter of the five men nearly a year to the day after Special Forces hunted down and killed Osama bin Laden.
These are the men whom President George W. Bush had brought to the U.S. Navy base in southeast Cuba for trials by military commissions in 2006, proceedings that President Barack Obama had halted to reform them with Congress in a bid to make them more credible in international law and human rights circles.
All five are accused of conspiring to organize, train or funnel funds to the 19 hijackers who flew four airliners into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a Pennsylvania field on Sept. 11, 2001. Each is charged with killing 2,976 people. Each faces execution, if convicted, by a method yet to be decided by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta or his successor.
And, if past court appearances are any indicator, Mohammed will take the lead defendant’s seat — and center stage — at the Guantánamo war court where he has described himself as a warrior for radical Islam and told a military judge that he welcomed martyrdom.
“We don’t care about the capital punishment,’’ Mohammed said at his last war court appearance in 2009. “We are doing jihad for the cause of God.”
Since arriving at Guantánamo, Mohammed has portrayed himself as a grandiose mystic — posing for a Red Cross photo kneeling on a prayer rug, flowing white robe and mammoth beard in one appearance, bragging to a military panel that he beheaded Wall Street Journal correspondent Daniel Pearl “with my blessed hand” in another, and calling himself a revolutionary just like George Washington.
He has signed his court documents as “KSM,” the nickname American law enforcement gave him in a worldwide manhunt.
In his war court charge sheet he comes off as a meticulous micromanager of the largest mass murder in American history — coaching the mostly Saudi hijackers on the most basic brutish English for their mission — “if anyone moves, I’ll kill you” — then having them practice the art of slaughter on sheep, goats and camels.
Nowhere does it mention that the CIA waterboarded him an unrivaled 183 times to break him at secret overseas prisons, using interrogation techniques the Obama administration now brands as torture. Nor does it note that he became so accustomed to the treatment that he counted off the seconds of near-drowning with his fingers, having realized that the CIA was not authorized to actually kill him.
“I think at his core, KSM is rotten. There’s something really, really wrong,” says Terry McDermott, co-author of The Hunt for KSM.
The book, recently released, tracks Mohammed’s path from his youth in Kuwait through North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University in Greensboro to Bin Laden in Afghanistan. It concludes all the harsh interrogation techniques got the United States no closer to finding bin Laden. A differing account, just written by the ex-CIA official who oversaw the secret interrogations, Jose Rodriguez, argues the techniques were crucial to national security.
But on Mohammed’s ambition the men agree. “As near as we can tell, from 1992 until he was captured, he did nothing but terrorism,” McDermott said. “In that time he probably came up with 100 different ideas for how to kill people. It was nonstop.”
Now, he faces off with the new chief judge of military commissions, Army Col. James L. Pohl, as the lead defendant in the complex conspiracy prosecution that Attorney General Eric Holder wanted put before a civilian jury in Manhattan — “in a courtroom just blocks away from where the Twin Towers once stood.”
Congress thwarted that ambition. So now, all five men will be brought before Pohl at Guantánamo’s maximum-security court complex in a rare Saturday arraignment that starts the so-called speedy time clock toward trial before a military jury of 12 or more field-grade officers, called a Military Commission. Attendance at the arraignment is mandatory, to hear the charges against them and answer the judge on whether they’ll accept their Pentagon-paid defense teams.
Walid bin Attash, 33, a Yemeni who lost his leg in a 1997 battlefield accident in Afghanistan, sits behind Mohammed in court and is cast in the charge sheets as the No. 2 of the so-called “Planes Operation.”
He’s a former al-Qaida training camp instructor who allegedly handpicked some of the Sept. 11 hijackers out of a hand-to-hand combat training course two years before 9/11 — and brought them to Mohammed in Pakistan. There they practiced on a computer-driven flight simulation program and learned the English they needed for their mission.
Ramzi bin al Shibh, 40, sits behind bin Attash in court. Bin al Shibh is another Yemeni who is described in the charge sheets as applying four times to get a U.S. visa, starting more than year before the terror attacks, and failing each time before ultimately serving as a Hamburg, Germany, based deputy, transferring funds to some of the hijackers as well as trying to enroll himself along with the actual hijackers in Florida flight schools.
In 2009 at Guantánamo, before the Bush-era trial was abandoned, bin al Shibh was never able to persuade the court that, like Mohammed and bin Attash, he was competent enough to function as his own lawyer in court. Instead, he was prone to outbursts — from interrupting proceedings to offer Muslim holiday greetings to bin Laden to observing that then-judge Ralph Kohlmann, a Marine colonel, had a Jewish-sounding name.
He was the first of the five to be captured, according to news reports, in a Pakistani-U.S. intelligence raid a year to the day after the 9/11 attacks, on Sept. 11, 2002, in Karachi, Pakistan.• The computer engineer who introduced himself in court as Ammar al Baluchi, 34, is identified as Ali Abdul Aziz Ali in court documents. A nephew of Mohammed, he’s a Pakistani by nationality who speaks excellent English and is accused of moving money and making travel arrangements for the hijackers. His charge sheet describes him as a would-be martyr who, just weeks before Sept. 11, sought a one-week visa to visit the United States on Sept. 4. He was turned down, and seized by Pakistani authorities on April 29, 2003, in Karachi along with bin Attash.
Mustafa al Hawsawi, 43, a Saudi national, also is accused of moving money and credit cards to some of the hijackers, helping some buy clothing while in transit from Dubai, the United Arab Emirates, to Orlando, via London. At one point he sent a package to one of the United Airlines hijackers in Delray Beach. CIA agents captured him on the same day as Mohammed on March 1, 2003, in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, according to leaked documents. Like the other alleged 9/11 conspirators, he disappeared into the agency’s secret prison network, only to surface at Guantánamo in September 2006, a transfer Bush announced in a White House press conference.
Join the Discussion
Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.