Can Margo stop the missile crisis?
A Cornell student becomes the conduit between Kennedy and Khrushchev in this political thriller.
08/17/2014 12:00 AM
08/16/2014 9:40 PM
Stephen L. Carter, the author of this fictionalized account of the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, is a law professor at Yale and a prolific writer. His nonfiction books offer serious reflections on politics, race, religion and law. His novels — this is his sixth — are often fast-moving, fanciful looks at the upper levels of American politics.
Back Channel re-imagines those harrowing days in October 1962 when Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev tried to station nuclear missiles in Cuba and President John F. Kennedy tried to stop him without sparking World War III. This story, too, features a young black heroine: Margo Jensen, an attractive, intelligent, 19-year-old student at Cornell who becomes the conduit between Kennedy and Khrushchev as both men struggle, rather blindly, to achieve their goals without blowing up the world.
And how did this innocent young woman find herself at the center of that cosmic drama? It involves a politically connected professor who is fond of her and a trip to a chess competition in Bulgaria, where she hangs out with that troubled young genius, Bobby Fischer. She also meets a senior Soviet intelligence official who is a dove, by Kremlin standards, and who decides that Margo could be his “back channel” in negotiating with the White House as the missile crisis heats up.
The Soviet agent, Aleksandr Fomin, fears that high-level hawks in both countries will push their leaders into nuclear war. The question is whether a face-saving compromise can be achieved. Soon, Fomin, who’s in touch with Khrushchev, is passing possible solutions on to Margo, who relays them to Kennedy in secret meetings at a townhouse on Capitol Hill.
This leads to another complication. Kennedy is willing to discuss life-or-death issues with Margo, but soon he’s hitting on her. But Margo’s beloved grandmother taught her to beware of men who would take liberties, so she resists valiantly. But what’s she to do when a nasty tabloid reporter threatens to expose the supposed affair?
Hawks from both the United States and the Soviet Union find out about Margo’s peacemaking role, and soon she’s being chased, shot at, kidnapped and otherwise treated badly all over Washington. As the nuclear deadline nears, it looks as if the world may be blown to smithereens because this one college student can’t be found to tell Kennedy what to do next.
Back Channel features nicely observed characters — Kennedy’s curt but brilliant national security adviser, McGeorge Bundy, is notably well-sketched — as well as clever scenes of bureaucratic infighting. After the missile crisis ends peacefully, Carter neatly explains certain relationships, exposes unknown villains and relates Margo’s later life. He also floats the grim theory that Kennedy’s victory over the hawks in October 1962 might have led directly to their ultimate victory over him in November 1963.
How you feel about this novel will probably depend on whether you can accept the notion that only teenage Margo can save humanity. Otherwise Back Channel is so smart, well-written and well-informed about Washington that I surrendered. If it’s a bit of a fairy tale, so be it. Carter is a serious man who often wrestles with serious issues, and he must have fun writing his novels, even when they become pure, mile-a-minute entertainment. You can share in the fun if you’ll willingly suspend your disbelief.
Patrick Anderson reviewed this book for The Washington Post.
Oops, you haven't selected any newsletters. Please check the box next to one or more of our email newsletters and submit again.
Oops, you didn't provide a valid email address. Please double-check the email field and submit again.
Join the Discussion
Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.