Colleges Scandals intertwining universities with some mix of athletics or privilege or alcohol haven’t shown any sign of abating.Cohan writes that Duke president Richard Brodhead declined to be interviewed. He writes that when he told Brodhead abou
05/11/2014 12:00 AM
05/09/2014 12:17 PM
The details you may recall of the March 2006 Duke lacrosse scandal are likely scant. If the constant spin of the 24-hour news cycle hasn’t erased all of them from your memory, you may remember that three members of a lacrosse team were erroneously charged with the rape of a stripper after a sloppy if not malicious investigation by the police and the local district attorney.
The lacrosse players weren’t cleared until after a rush to judgment by a media and a public quick to frame the allegations of a black stripper against privileged white youth as a symbol of the enduring conflict of black vs. white and poor vs. rich.
Eight years after the fact, author William D. Cohan has provided an account of the scandal in The Price of Silence. Cohan’s book is as exhaustively researched as it is fair and objective. The level of detail and the rare interviews he scored with disbarred prosecutor Mike Nifong and the accuser, Crystal Mangum, are accomplishments but not the end game.
What makes this book a worthy read is the perspective. Cohan convincingly places the Duke lacrosse scandal within the context of America’s most prestigious universities’ too-often unchecked ambitions.
Though a sexual assault was declared not to have occurred that March night by the state of North Carolina, the lacrosse players engaged in underage drinking, hiring strippers and shouting racial epithets at the strippers. Cohan details how Duke may have set the stage for that misbehavior and for the murkiness that would follow.
In the years leading up to the scandal, Duke wanted to position itself as the Harvard of the South and the Stanford of the East. By 2006, Duke was considered the fifth-best university in the country by U.S. News and World Report. Duke’s basketball team had been prominent since the 1980s, and the other sports were catching up, including men’s lacrosse, runners-up in the 2005 NCAA Tournament.
Had this growth come at an expense? It certainly would. The scandal ended up costing Duke an estimated $100 million, including an estimated $60 million Cohan reports was paid to the three accused lacrosse players.
Cohan, a Duke alumnus and author of several books about the world of finance, takes us through the scandal as if he’s a third-person omniscient narrator in a work as rich as most fiction. What stands out as you read is how little higher education has changed since then. Universities continue to accommodate arguably destructive influences, and the results can be disastrous. The Penn State scandal is certainly well-known, but universities such as Virginia, Cornell, Vanderbilt and Amherst have faced repercussions from incidents involving deaths and sexual assault. A New York Times investigation revealed this month that Florida State University did not properly investigate a sexual assault involving its Heisman winning quarterback, Jameis Winston.
Cohan writes that Duke president Richard Brodhead declined to be interviewed. He writes that when he told Brodhead about The Price of Silence last year Brodhead asked, “Why do you have to write this book? We are just getting over the events of March 2006.” The answer is simple: Eight years after the scandal’s scorched-earth effect on everyone involved, scandals intertwining universities with some mix of athletics or privilege or alcohol haven’t shown any sign of abating.
Mark Dent reviewed this book for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Oops, you haven't selected any newsletters. Please check the box next to one or more of our email newsletters and submit again.
Oops, you didn't provide a valid email address. Please double-check the email field and submit again.
Join the Discussion
Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.