INSURANCE
Federal wind coverage plan gets walloped
High costs are cited as efforts to add an amendment for wind coverage to the flood insurance bill fail.
Posted on Thu, May. 08, 2008
BY LESLEY CLARK
WILFREDO LEE / AP FILE, 2005
Homeowners cover their roofs in blue tarps to cover damage cause by Hurricane Wilma in Broward County, Oct. 26, 2005.
WASHINGTON --
A Gulf Coast-backed effort to add wind coverage to the National Flood Insurance Program was soundly defeated Wednesday in the Senate amid concerns that it would be too expensive.
The drive to add the amendment to the flood insurance bill failed 19 to 73. Opponents said they were leery of the cost and opposed to federal intervention in private markets.
Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, urged a vote against the amendment, but said he was ''determined to come up with some answers'' on providing affordable insurance to homeowners in disaster-prone states.
''Wind is an issue we have to grapple with, but the last thing we want to do is destroy a flood program which we very well could by overwhelming it,'' Dodd said.
Gulf Coast lawmakers pleaded for relief, saying homeowners in their states were finding it increasingly difficult to afford or even find insurance.
''People who have paid every premium and have never filed a claim are simply locked out of the market,'' said Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla.
VETO THREAT
The White House has already said it will veto any bill that contains the provision.
Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., who has pushed the measure in the Senate, said a review by the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the proposal would create no ``significant budgetary impact.''
''By covering wind and flood risks in one policy, the multiple peril option will allow coastal homeowners to buy insurance and know that hurricane damage would be covered,'' Wicker said. He called it a ''common sense proposal'' that would prevent homeowners from having to go to court to determine whether a house was damaged by flood or wind.
''This might not be perfect, but it would send the signal that there needs to be a federal response to this situation,'' he said.
Last fall, the House passed legislation that would add wind coverage to the flood insurance program, but Dodd said the wind clause could carry unknown costs.
`LEGITIMATE ISSUE'
''It's not that we disagree. It's a legitimate issue,'' Dodd said. ``But this amendment could end up costing us billions more than we anticipate. We don't have any idea.''
Dodd's flood insurance bill would keep the national flood insurance program running through 2013 and forgive a $17 billion debt built up after Hurricane Katrina. The current program ends at the close of the fiscal year.
SOME RELIEF, MAYBE
Dodd noted the bill may provide some relief: it calls for creating a commission to study the feasibility of creating a national catastrophe insurance fund, an idea Florida lawmakers have embraced. The commission would be required to report back to Congress within nine months.
The House passed a bill in November to create a voluntary risk pool among states prone to natural disasters, but there has been little appetite for it in the Senate, where many senators from states less prone to hurricanes say their constituents should not have to subsidize people who live in riskier areas. The White House has threatened to veto that legislation, saying the bill would crowd out private insurers.
Join the discussion
The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from personal comments and remarks that are off point. In order to post comments, you must be a registered user of MiamiHerald.com. Your username will show along with the comments you post. Not a registered user? It's Free!
Register here. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.