Kurt Bressner spent more than $16,000 installing storm shutters, a reinforced garage door and an impact-resistant front door on his Boynton Beach home. In return, he got more than peace of mind.

Effective this year, he got a $5,362 break on his annual insurance premiums.

Now, Bressner -- and more than 700,000 other Florida consumers who spent big money to fortify their homes -- could see their ``wind mitigation'' discounts dramatically reduced.

Insurers, led by State Farm Florida, are complaining that the discounts for installing shutters and other protections have become so popular that they are undercutting the industry's bottom line.

Last year, citing the cost of the discounts, State Farm asked for a 47.1 percent rate increase. The state said no, but the Legislature agreed to review how the discounts are tallied. The first public hearing is Wednesday in Tallahassee.

Bressner thinks it is ``counter-intuitive'' for insurers to want to strip away incentives that encourage policyholders to make their homes better able to withstand a windstorm.

State Sen. Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey, who serves on the Senate's banking and insurance committee, recalled State Farm's president testifying on behalf of the discounts.

``This is what they wanted and this is what they got,'' Fasano said. ``Now they want to take away [the discounts] from homeowners. That's a promise they've broken.''

Still, lawmakers are willing to listen to the industry.

``We want to be sure that the discounts we're offering are right,'' said State Rep. Bryan Nelson, the Apopka Republican who sponsored the law mandating the review.

``We're reducing premiums every year,'' said Carol Everhart, a member of the governing board with Citizens Property Insurance, the state's largest insurer. ``But what we're doing isn't based on a valid study.''

State Farm did not respond to requests for comment.

Wind mitigation discounts have been around since 2003, but they became wildly popular four years ago, when insurance rates exploded after a series of hurricanes in 2004 and 2005. In late 2006, with rates rising rapidly, Insurance Commissioner Ken McCarty ordered the discounts doubled.

Trouble was, so many applied for the discounts -- including 260,000 of State Farm's Florida policyholders -- that the insurers saw revenues shrink.

Insurers aren't arguing that the discounts be eliminated, only that they ought to be recalibrated.

This means tackling some complex calculations: Are hurricane shutters worth a 30 percent discount on a premium? Is impact-resistant glass just as effective and deserving of the same discount?

Another question that has been raised: Should people who do nothing to protect their homes -- no shutters, no roof straps, no reinforced doors -- be slapped with a surcharge?

Gary Harger, president of Cypress Property & Casualty Insurance, believes a mixture of discounts and surcharges is the answer.

State Farm, which has led the charge for reexamining the discounts, is a lame duck player in the Florida insurance business. It has announced its intention to stop writing property insurance in Florida in the next two years. The company's Florida subsidiary could be insolvent within three years if the current setup isn't adjusted, State Farm says.

But the company still has clout. On Thursday, the Office of Insurance Regulation cut State Farm a break when it ruled the company can reduce or eliminate discounts for installing burglar alarms or having multiple policies with the company. The net impact: Premiums will rise from 5 to 20 percent.

Join the discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. In order to post comments, you must be a registered user of MiamiHerald.com. Your username will show along with the comments you post. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

     Showing: Oldest first Newest first Most-recommended first Least-recommended first

@Nyx.AuthorDisplayName@ wrote on @Nyx.PostedAtTime@:

@Nyx.repliedToText@

@Nyx.replyAnswerText@

Reply to this Comment @Nyx.Recommender@ @Nyx.AbuseReporter@