Regulators may put stricter oversight on MetLife

 

AP Business Writer

U.S. regulators are proposing to label insurer MetLife Inc. as a potential threat to the financial system, a designation that brings stricter government oversight.

New York-based MetLife says it "strongly disagrees" with the decision by the Financial Stability Oversight Council on Thursday to propose designating the company as "systemically important." That would mean the company was deemed so big and interconnected that it could cause damage to the financial system if it failed.

If the designation becomes final, MetLife would have to increase its cushion of capital against losses, limit its use of borrowed money and submit to inspections by examiners. The company would come under the supervision of the Federal Reserve. Its primary regulator now is the state of New York.

Congress created the regulators' council after the 2008 financial crisis to monitor markets and prevent another crisis and taxpayer bailout. It is led by Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and includes other top regulators such as Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen. Regulators saw a need for closer oversight of big nonbank financial companies after the near-collapse of American International Group Inc. threatened to bring down the financial system during the 2008 crisis.

The biggest banks already were under the Fed's supervision, and the overhaul law brought strict new rules for them, such as on the amount of capital they must hold to cover potential losses. Nonbank companies that are designated as systemically important are also subject to those rules.

MetLife would be the fourth financial firm that is not a bank to be named systemically important. Last year the council tagged AIG, General Electric Co.'s finance arm GE Capital and insurer Prudential Financial Inc. as such.

MetLife said it may fight the designation. MetLife CEO Steven Kandarian said in a statement that the company was not systemically important under the criteria of the 2010 financial overhaul law. The insurer argues that its industry is less risky than banking, and that imposing bank capital rules on life insurance companies would make it harder for Americans to buy insurance products.

MetLife will have 30 days to request a hearing with the council to dispute the council's decision. In order for the designation to become final, the council must vote a second time, with at least two-thirds of the 10 voting members agreeing.

Read more Breaking News - Business stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category