Guantánamo-bound MRI machine redirected to Maryland

 
 
An American flag waves, seen through a broken window in an unused airplane hangar at Camp Justice in this image approved for release by the U.S. military at the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Thursday, July 16, 2009.
An American flag waves, seen through a broken window in an unused airplane hangar at Camp Justice in this image approved for release by the U.S. military at the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Thursday, July 16, 2009.
BRENNAN LINSLEY / ASSOCIATED PRESS

Timeline:

Sept. 28, 2012 Guantánamo prison orders $1.65 million mobile MRI machine from Pennsylvania firm.

Jan. 28, 2013 Guantánamo prison deadline for delivery of machine to Jacksonville, Florida

June 4, 2014 Guantánamo detainee’s attorneys file motion asking for MRI scan.

June 18, 2014 Prosecutors reply in motion that there’s no MRI at Guantánamo.

Aug. 7, 2014 Prison spokesman says officials decided they didn’t need an MRI machine, had it shipped to Army agency for delivery June 30.


crosenberg@MiamiHerald.com

The curious tale of the missing prison camp MRI machine is only partially solved.

A detention center spokesman said staff did indeed purchase a $1.65 million mobile MRI, short for magnetic resonance imaging machine, some time ago. But someone decided not to have it shipped to this remote U.S. Navy base in southeast Cuba currently holding 149 captives managed by about 2,200 Pentagon staff, mostly soldiers.

“After further analysis, it was determined other modalities [at Guantánamo] could be used to assist with diagnosis and treatment of detainees’ acute medical conditions to include CT scan and ultrasound,” said Navy Capt. Tom Gresback.

On Sept. 28, 2012, Guantánamo’s contracting office awarded a Pennsylvania medical supply firm with the job of delivering a mobile MRI within four months to a port in Jacksonville, where a barge brings supplies to Guantánamo. At that time, a prison spokesman said the purchase could also be used for the outpost’s sailors and other non-prisoners, who traditionally need a week or so to go to Jacksonville for medical treatment.

But what became of the scanner after that is still a bit of a mystery — if it ever got to Florida, when, and where it went from there. Gresback said Thursday morning that U.S. Army Medical Materiel Agency, based in Fort Detrick, Maryland, “took over as custodian of the Mobile MRI system” — with an intended delivery date of June 30 of this year.

That was 26 days after attorneys for the accused USS Cole bomber, Abd al Rahim al Nashiri, filed a legal motion asking a Guantánamo war court judge to order the military to take an MRI of his brain to scan for damage.

The machine’s whereabouts are unconfirmed. A Fort Detrick public affairs official with the Army agency granted custody of it did not return calls Thursday morning from a Miami Herald reporter seeking to determine when the agency was told it was theirs, and where it would go next.

In court Wednesday, a federal prosecutor said military medical staff at Guantánamo disagreed with a civilian doctor who examined Nashiri and recommended that an MRI would help assist in planning treatment for his Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

Army Col. Robert Moscati, a federal prosecutor in civilian life, also told the judge that a senior Pentagon official responsible for the war court should first decide whether to devote resources to getting Nashiri an MRI.

“There is not an MRI machine here and available at Naval Station Guantánamo Bay; therefore, there should be a request” to the Pentagon official first, Moscati said.

Nashiri, 49, is accused of orchestrating al-Qaida’s Oct. 12, 2000, suicide attack on the USS Cole warship off Yemen that killed 17 American sailors. U.S. agents waterboarded him and interrogated him with threats of a power drill and a handgun, and his lawyers want to know if an MRI will show brain damage.

Miami Herald reporter Carol Rosenberg tweets @carolrosenberg

Read more Guantánamo stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category