Shame on UM

 

I, too, am discouraged by the University of Miami’s irresponsibility toward a loyal community by quietly selling a significant and critical rockland habitat for several endangered species. It’s utter fantasy to think these species can be moved.

Does anyone consider the human species and its quality of life? The impact on a highway that already does not sustain the traffic? Do we living out here have a say? This is unsafe.

Is Miami-Dade County asleep or did I miss something? A 1984 ordinance requires preservation of at least 80 percent of rockland if an owner builds on it. Instead, we are being rammed with another toxic strip mall with another Walmart — and more traffic from 900 apartments.

It’s laughable the developer, Ram, trots out the overused promise that a “unique chance to create … a place where people can easily walk from neighborhood to shops and elsewhere.” Sadly, more traffic will increase the danger of walking.

The county has not provided an adequate evacuation route in case a hurricane approaches. As of now, 152nd Street is the only way out and has yet to meet the needs of our community.

Linda Wanshel, Mi

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • The readers’ forum

    Don’t create nightmare traffic a road to nowhere

    Re the Sept. 6 article, Dolphin Expressway extension gets mixed reaction: In 2004 when the Miami-Dade Commission had an agenda filled with proposed developments to extend the Urban Development Boundary, a group called Hold the Line was organized and stopped the commission. I am proud to have been a leader as president of the Urban Environment League along with the Tropical Audubon Society, the Sierra Club, and hundreds of residents from the many communities that comprise Miami-Dade County. The Commission wisely stopped this attack on the natural environment of the western limits of the county.

  • Support PAMM

    Re the Sept. 12 Other Views column, PAMM shouldn’t get public funding: How could any piece be so far off base?

  • Hobby Lobby whim

    Re the Miami Herald’s Sept. 7 Other Views column, Hobby Lobby decision a blow to practice of medicine: I take exception to the characterization by Drs. John Jennings and Britani Kessler of the deeply held convictions of some employers as “whims” to be cavalierly brushed aside.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category