PolitiFact Florida

Vouchers take $3 billion out of public schools, Nan Rich says

 

PolitiFact Florida found that the Democratic gubernatorial candidate’s statement was mostly false.

PolitiFact Florida

The statement: “$3 billion over the next five years will be taken out of our public schools and be put into vouchers.”

Nan Rich on Saturday, May 10th, 2014 in a speech.

The ruling: There’s not $3 billion in funding that’s being removed from a public schools budget and put into a voucher program budget. Instead, Rich was referring to the state’s Tax Credit Scholarship Program, which gives corporations tax credits when they give money to allow poor students to attend private schools.

We rate this claim: Mostly False.

Politifact Florida is a partnership between The Tampa Bay Times and The Miami Herald to check out truth in politics.


PolitiFact Florida

While Gov. Rick Scott has portrayed himself as a champion of public education spending, he has overseen an expansion of a voucher program that hurts public schools, says former state Sen. Nan Rich, D-Weston.

And she also hurls some blame at Scott’s predecessors, including her Democratic rival Charlie Crist.

“The education reform that started under Jeb Bush, it continued under Charlie Crist and now has gone to a new level with Rick Scott. That includes a bill that just passed the last day of this session — a bad day for public education, folks — $3 billion over the next five years will be taken out of our public schools and be put into vouchers,” Rich said on May 10 in remarks to the Orange County Voters League. ( Rejoice Magazine posted video of her remarks online.)

We decided to fact-check Rich’s claim that $3 billion from public schools will go to vouchers during the next five years.

Rich called it a voucher progam; it actually works through a tax credit. Regardless of the specifics, opponents say it sends funding to private — mostly religious — schools and undermines the public school system. Supporters say that the money provides poor children, including many minorities, a deserved escape from underperforming public schools.

Here’s how it works: In 2001 under Gov. Jeb Bush, the state established the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program to give scholarships to poor children to attend private schools. The program provides dollar-for-dollar income tax credits for corporations that give money to organizations that give the scholarships. (Both Scott and Crist, the Democratic primary front-runner, are supporters of the program.)

About 60,000 students have scholarships for the 2013-14 school year, and the maximum amount per student is $4,880.

During the legislative session, Republican lawmakers proposed allowing more children to get the scholarships. A watered-down version of the bill, Senate 850, passed on May 2, the last day of the session. (It passed the Senate 29-11 and the House 70-44, largely along party lines with many Democrats voting against it.)

Lawmakers expanded eligibility by allowing a family of four earning up to $62,010 a year to receive a partial scholarship. The previous limit was about $44,000.

On June 20, Scott signed the bill into law.

Rich arrived at the $3 billion figure by pointing to a chart from Fund Education Now, a group that opposes the tax credits.

The chart shows that before this session, the tax credit program was on a path to add up to about $2.9 billion over the next five years. Though the chart doesn’t reflect the bill that ultimately passed, the program could add up to that amount over five years.

But does that money get taken out of our public schools, as Rich suggests?

Rich and other tax credit opponents argue that if Florida had no such tax credit program, those revenues would go into the state’s general fund, which pays for education and other services.

“It’s money that could be, should be, by all rights put into the general fund and could be used to invest in public schools,” said Kathleen Oropeza, co-founder of Fund Education Now. “They are diverting it.”

Not so, say supporters of tax credits — for two reasons:

• If the tax credit program didn’t exist, the money would go toward state general revenues. There is no evidence that the Legislature would then decide to direct those dollars to public schools. (State economist Amy Baker backs up that point in an email to PolitiFact Florida: “These numbers refer only to the revenue side of the state’s fiscal picture and don’t reflect what the Legislature may or may not spend” for public schools.)

• Tax credits can save the state money because a single voucher is less expensive than what the state spends per child in public schools.

“State education spending for students who receive scholarships is reduced by more than the amount of revenue lost,” states a 2008 study by Florida’s Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability.

The study noted that it is difficult to pinpoint the precise savings but estimated that in 2007-08, for every dollar lost in corporate income tax revenue, taxpayers saved $1.49 in state education funding. A later update estimated that the state saved about $36 million in 2008-09.

Our ruling

Rich said that “$3 billion over the next five years will be taken out of our public schools and be put into vouchers.”

There’s not $3 billion in funding that’s being removed from a public schools budget and put into a voucher program budget. Instead, Rich was referring to the state’s Tax Credit Scholarship Program, which gives corporations tax credits when they give money to allow poor students to attend private schools.

Based on the program’s size, it’s possible that it could fund a voucher program in the ballpark of $3 billion over the next five years.

But there’s no guarantee that money would otherwise have gone to public schools. And, private school vouchers tend to cost less than what it costs to educate a child in public schools, which complicates how much money taxpayers would pay if the children in private schools instead went to public schools. That’s even more true now that the state raised the income eligibility requirements this year.

We rate this claim Mostly False.

Read more Miami-Dade stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category