Latest dispute in redistricting case tossed to Supreme Court


Herald/Times Tallahassee Bureau

The trial challenging Florida’s newly drawn congressional map ended two weeks ago, and the judge could rule at any time on whether the revised district boundaries violate the law.

But a First District Court of Appeal opinion issued Thursday could jeopardize the use of 538 pages of confidential documents that were introduced as evidence.

The appeals court voted 5-4 that the Florida Supreme Court should decide whether the Leon County Circuit Court judge assigned to the case erred when he gave the plaintiffs in the case — a coalition of citizens’ groups — access to the secret e-mails, maps and planning documents held by political consultants to Republican legislators.

Now, the Supreme Court will have to decide whether it wants to take up the case. If it does, it could uphold or overturn Circuit Judge Terry Lewis’ initial ruling that the secret documents were admissible in court.

It is unclear how much these documents affect the larger case. Mark Herron, a lawyer for the coalition that includes the League of Women Voters of Florida and seven Democratic-leaning individuals, said the dispute about this evidence is just one aspect of the case. The Republican Party of Florida declined to comment.

The citizen groups have asked Lewis to invalidate the congressional map that the Legislature approved in 2012.

Thursday’s opinion was a procedural development that both sides had expected. The circuit court, appeals court and Supreme Court have been bouncing around rulings on the secret documents for weeks.

The four appellate judges who dissented from Thursday’s opinion said they had concerns about process and the merits of the dispute over the evidence. Certifying the matter to the high court is not justified because the issue is not one of “great public importance,” as the majority said, but “merely a discovery dispute that happened to arise in an important, high-profile case,” wrote Appellate Judge T. Kent Wetherell.

Herron believes the dispute about evidence, which pits political consulting firm Data Targeting and its owner Pat Bainter against the citizen groups, isn’t the only matter that will eventually wind up in the state’s highest court.

“This opinion on the Bainter documents and the issue of the merits of the trial that went for two weeks with Judge Lewis will eventually all be before the Florida Supreme Court,” he said.

Contact Tia Mitchell at

Read more Political Currents stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category