REGULATION

There’s no prosperity without economic freedom

 
 
MCT
MCT
Patrick Sedlar / MCT

jazel@childpsych.org

The good news is that economic freedom is advancing worldwide. That is the finding of The Heritage Foundation’s 2014 Index of Economic Freedom, which covers 186 countries encompassing 99 percent of the world’s population. In measuring economic freedom, the index analyzes countries’ commitment to the rule of law, principles of limited government, regulatory efficiency and open markets.

Hong Kong and Singapore lead the rankings as the world’s freest economies and Cuba and North Korea close the ranks as the most repressed economies.

The bad news is that the United States is on an opposite path as the only country that has registered a decline in economic freedom for seven consecutive years.

A microcosmic example of the regulatory environment that overawes our entrepreneurial spirit is playing out in our community, and elsewhere, as ride-sharing modernizers Lyft and UberX are harassed and persecuted. These visionary ride-sharing companies match passengers with drivers using technology in an innovative win-win fashion. But the car-for-hire industry is not happy with these new competitors confronting their oligopolistic practices.

What we have yet to learn, and the political class ignores, is that economic success is not our natural birthright. Economic liberty must be defended. Prosperity cannot survive without economic freedom and the innovations that it spurs. When was the last time anyone rented a movie from Blockbuster or bought film from Kodak?

The last two years of the Bush presidency and the first two years of the Obama presidency marked the largest expansion of state power in the United States since the 1930s. As a result, the United States continues to lose ground in economic freedom.

Since 2007, the United States has tumbled from one of the top 10 most free economies to 12th place. According to the index’s rankings, the United States is now considered “mostly free.” It has earned the dubious distinction of being second only to Argentina in recording the longest sustained decline in economic freedom in the 20-year history of the index.

There is a clear and positive relationship between economic freedom and the level of prosperity in a given country. As documented by the index, countries with greater economic freedoms reach higher incomes and better standards of life, whereas governments that take over their countries’ economies impoverish the citizenry. And yet, the economic and regulatory policy direction of the United States is fast-tracking the loss of our economic freedoms with a substantial growth in the size and scope of government.

Moreover, cronyism and corruption — classic byproducts of the expansive use of government to manage economic activity — are further eroding economic freedom. The material-prosperity case for economic freedom is clear cut. The data show that the free-market system has fueled unprecedented economic growth around the world.

Over the past two decades, as the global economy has moved toward greater economic freedom, hundreds of millions of people have been raised out of poverty.

In our small example, upstarts Lyft and UberX offer not only higher value for consumers, but also a source of income for the drivers.

The moral case for economic freedom is equally clear cut, albeit less obvious, thus allowing for a specious case to be made for government controls. The powerful taxi interests claim that they are defending public safety in their push against Lyft and UberX. That proposition is close to an oxymoron.

In an essay accompanying the 2014 Index of Economic Freedom, Professor John Tomasi of Brown University seeks to make the ethical case for economic freedom as the most moral of societal arrangements and a societal good in its own right. By protecting economic freedom, he argues, we respect others as our moral equals and we assert that governments must respect citizens as responsible authors of their own lives. “Diminishing personal agency in economic affairs — no matter how lofty the social goal — may drain vital blood from a person’s life.”

Speaking for this author of his personal life; I must go now, as my Uber app just notified me that the driver is here to pick me up.

José Azel is a senior scholar at the Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies, University of Miami and the author of the book “Mañana in Cuba.”

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
DE LA O

    A JUDGE’S VIEW

    Judge has faith in the law, and in human potential

    I am a circuit judge in Miami-Dade County serving in the criminal division. Every day, I make decisions about whether to release defendants who are awaiting trial and whose families rely on them for basic needs; whether to grant requests by victims of domestic violence to remove stay-away orders that keep their families apart; and whether to sentence convicted defendants to prison, house arrest or probation.

  •  
MCT

    JUDICIAL ELECTIONS

    There’s got to be a better way to seat judges

    When I think of the traits that are essential for someone to be a good judge, I immediately identify characteristics such as legal ability and understanding of legal principles, courtroom experience, record and reputation, temperament and community involvement. As a Miami-Dade County voter, and as someone who has served on several endorsement panels for various organizations, I have serious concerns about the quality of the candidates that are running for this very important post. I also have reservations about the election process through which we are selecting the members of our lower courts.

  •  
Jack Orr cast the only vote in the Florida Legislature in support of school integration.

    JOHN B. ORR

    A man of vision, principle — and flaws

    It was 1956, and the Florida Legislature was considering a bill to get around the U.S. Supreme Court ruling barring racial segregation in schools. Only one of the 90 House members voted against the bill — a young lawyer from Miami named Jack Orr.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category