Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

Take skeptical view of telecom merger mania

 

OUR OPINION: Regulators must consider the cost to consumers of consolidation

HeraldEd@MiamiHerald.com

It’s hard to blame consumers if their initial reaction to the proposed $48.5-billion merger of AT&T and DirecTV is to reach for their wallets and hold on tight. Mergers usually leave the public with fewer choices and lead to higher prices.

What makes this merger of vital importance to consumers is the near universal demand for the companies’ services. Turned off by airline mergers and rising fares? In a pinch, there are still road and rail alternatives. But these days almost everyone buys service from a telecom company, unless they’re completely off the grid, which is both unlikely and impractical — or go back to rabbit ears (LOL).

And lately, mergers are all the rage in the telecom world. The business of providing pay TV, Internet connections and phone service is coming down to a handful of industry giants.

The Comcast-Time Warner (CTW) deal, worth $45 billion, was announced three months ago. In that agreement, which is awaiting government approval, both partners made much of the fact that although they are both cable systems, each serves different geographical areas, with little overlap. Thus, they argued, a merger would not amount to decreased competition for individual consumers.

The proposed consolidation between AT&T, the No. 2 seller of high-speed Internet service, and DirecTV, the largest satellite video provider, is a different deal. They compete head-to-head for TV viewers in 10 of the 20 largest metropolitan markets, including parts of South Florida.

To the claim that this would reduce choices for the affected consumers, executives at both firms argue that there are benefits for both sides. AT&T’s wireless customers, for example, would be able to tap into DirecTV video on their smartphones. And DirecTV customers would get better broadband, wireless and national bundle services.

To sweeten the offer for regulators and members of Congress, AT&T promised to expand its broadband service to 15 million new customer locations in rural parts of its service areas, as well as offering stand-alone broadband for three years to those who choose to go without bundled services — “over the top,” or OTT, in telecom jargon.

We particularly like the latter promise. These are undeniable benefits for some consumers, for a limited time in some instances. But there are significant concerns, as well, in the rapidly changing telecom world from all of these proposed combinations.

If the CTW merger is approved and AT&T/DirecTV’s is not, that would leave one behemoth in the telecom world standing alone, with an ability to overwhelm its competitors while hapless consumers watch impotently from the sidelines. If that merger is approved, then finding an equally robust competitor would only make sense.

Green-lighting both, however, would provide an incentive for all the other players to get into the act. That includes Sprint and T-Mobile, Charter, Verizon and the Dish Network, among others. It’s hard to see how consumers benefit as individual companies morph into telecom giants. Consider, as well, that much of the innovation in the telecom world, which began with the break-up of old Bell System more than 30 years ago, has been driven by competition.

For regulators, that should be the bottom line. The promised benefits have to be weighed against the obvious risk to consumers. Doing so, they may well conclude that it’s time to hit the pause button on merger mania.

Read more Editorials stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category