Coral reefs first line of defense in a hurricane



At a recent gathering in Orlando, meteorologists predicted a quiet hurricane season this year. Let’s hope so. Our coastal development choices, combined with changing storms and sea levels, have greatly increased the risks to our communities of coastal erosion and flooding.

Further compounding these risks is the loss of coastal habitats, such as reefs and wetlands — our first lines of coastal defense. Case in point — the power of healthy coral reefs, which can reduce a full 97 percent of the wave energy that would otherwise hit coastlines — reducing risk to roughly 200 million people around the world, according to a new study in the journal Nature Communications.

In fact, in one of many studies, coral reefs in Mexico provided this measured level of benefit during Hurricane Wilma in 2005. Without the reefs absorbing significant wave energy, the coastal damage would have been much worse.

This protective power is a big reason why coral reef degradation, particularly the kind that we have seen across southeast Florida and the Caribbean, is having particularly devastating effects on people and nature. Even small reductions in the height of reefs at their highest point — where most wave breaking occurs — allow significantly more wave energy to pass through and hit coastlines with greater force.

This is basic coastal engineering; if you reduce the height of a breakwater that runs the length of your coast by a foot (and the loss has sometimes been much more) then you will see major new impacts.

While there have been a lot of gloom-and-doom predictions about the future of reefs — and yes, acidification and warming of the ocean are hurting our corals — studies show that healthy, well-managed coral reefs can recover and adapt. We are probably underestimating that resilient quality.

Herein lies cause for optimism. Investing in coral reef protection and restoration can not only help bring these first lines of defense back to better health, but can also help many communities reduce the overall costs of their coastal infrastructure mix.

In fact, we’ve found that reef restoration for coastal defense can be less than one-tenth the cost of building similar breakwaters — echoing similar findings by reinsurance industry leaders. And, that’s not even considering the other co-benefits of reefs to fishing and tourism industries, for example.

Recognizing that reefs provide coastal defense should provide many new opportunities to invest in this “natural sea wall” as part of a blend of risk-reduction strategies. Indeed, hazard mitigation grants from FEMA and investments to protect infrastructure by departments of transportation or ports should also go in to reef conservation and restoration.

At the very least, taxpayers ought to demand that government consider the defense benefits of coastal habitat restoration when examining the costs and benefits of other infrastructure options. Both the Army Corp of Engineers and FEMA are developing approaches for such nature-based accounting. Coral reefs won’t do the job on their own, but they should be seen as a critical, cost-effective part of the mix.

As we approach June 1, the opening of hurricane season for the Atlantic coast, let’s remember that coral reefs are our first line of defense.

Michael Beck is the lead marine scientist for The Nature Conservancy.

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald



    Smartphones can help fight AIDS

    Coming in third may mean a bronze medal at the Olympics, but in Florida, data shows that three is not a cause for celebration. The Sunshine State ranks third in the nation for the cumulative number of AIDS cases, and it’s the third worst state for physician shortages.



    Border crisis overshadows trade progress

    Texas Gov. Rick Perry made headlines recently by ordering 1,000 National Guard troops to the border. This bravado comes at a price: $12 million a month. Perry plans to send the bill the federal government. That’s one way to finance your presidential campaign ads.

 <span class="cutline_leadin">ON THE EDGE:</span> An Israeli reserve tank stands near the Israeli-Gaza border as frantic efforts were underway on the diplomatic front to end the fighting at the start of the Eid al-Fitr holiday.


    This is a fight Israel did not seek

    The current conflict in Gaza was not of Israel’s choosing. Israelis, like all civilized humans, are shocked and saddened by the loss of innocent life and the destruction of war. While Israel had done everything possible to avoid large-scale armed confrontation, the immediate and lethal threat to the lives of its civilian population left the government with no choice but to defend its citizens.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category