Credit Suisse won’t get tax write-off on DOJ settlement

 

McClatchy Washington Bureau

Consumer advocates applauded Tuesday a unique clause hidden in the Department of Justice’s tax-evasion settlement with Credit Suisse that prevents the global banking giant from taking a tax write-off for its massive penalty.

Buried in the settlement with Credit Suisse, announced formally Monday night after weeks of speculation, is a clause that pleased public interest groups. The language prevented the Swiss bank from taking, directly or indirectly, and tax deduction, credit or any other offset against the huge $2.6 billion settlement it will pay as part of the plea agreement with the DOJ and bank regulators.

“This stipulation protects taxpayers. We call on the Justice Department to make it a standard practice,” Phineas Baxandall, a senior tax analyst for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement.

Although the bank agreed to pay $2.6 billion, roughly $1.33 billion was in fines and penalties that would have been difficult to deduct. Another $667 million must be paid as restitution to the Internal Revenue Service. Preventing a deduction from this sum alone, said Baxandall, will save taxpayers about $233 million.

“When companies write off settlements for wrongdoing as a tax deduction, ordinary taxpayers end up picking up the table, either in the form of higher tax rates to make up for lost revenues, cuts to public programs or higher national debt,” he said.

Bills in the House of Representatives and Senate seek to end the practice of businesses taking a tax write-off when settling cases with penalties and fines.

Credit Suisse late Monday acknowledged what had been made abundantly clear in a Senate hearing earlier this year_ that it for years had helped Americans flaunt U.S. tax laws and squirrel their money away in secret Swiss bank accounts.

The Justice Department did not highlight the special clause prohibiting tax write-offs for the settlement, but it was widely criticized for lacking such a clause in settlements with big U.S. banks and BP after its dreadful oil spill that fouled beaches across much of the U.S. portion of the Gulf of Mexico.

Read more National Business stories from the Miami Herald

  • Varying health premium subsidies worry consumers

    Some consumers who purchased insurance under the new health law are confused because they received varying subsidy amounts and are now stuck in lengthy appeals processes trying to figure out which estimate is accurate.

  • 2 Baton Rouge banks merge

    Business First Bancshares Inc. is acquiring American Gateway Financial Corp., combining two Baton Rouge banks into a financial institution with $1 billion in assets and 16 locations.

  • Judge OKs settlement ends Ohio workers comp case

    A judge has approved a lawsuit settlement that will see the Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation paying out $420 million to state employers that were overcharged for insurance premiums.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category