The readers’ forum

Protect pregnant women against discrimination

 

The State of Florida through chapter 760 of the Florida Statutes provides vital protection against discrimination for individuals on the basis of several categories, including sex, color, and religion. One category of individuals noticeably missing from such beneficial protection is pregnant women. Federal law has afforded them protection since 1978. Over the last decade, there have been multiple attempts to amend Florida law to include pregnant women as a protected class; however to date, including this legislative session, all such attempts have failed.

The main issue preventing the amending of the statute is the apparent ambiguity within Florida’s Civil Rights Act. Legal opinions from lower courts throughout the state are far from conclusive in their interpretation of this Act and, in many instances, contradictory. While some courts afford pregnant women remedies for being victims of discrimination, other courts completely deny pregnant women any protection under the Act.

Recently, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that pregnancy is a covered basis for discrimination under Chapter 760, F.S. Because of this ruling, the Florida House decided that there was no need to bring to the House Floor clarifying legislation (CS/HB 105 and CS/SB 220). Both bills made substantial progress through this year’s legislative session — passing out of seven committees in both houses, and ultimately voted out by the full Senate, where it passed unanimously. The Senate version sat in Messages to the House, while its House companion languished in the House Rules Committee. All that needed to be done was for the House to take up the Senate bill out of Messages, vote on it and send it to the governor!

For clarification purposes, the provision needs to be codified in the Florida Statutes, especially given Justice Ricky Polston’s dissenting opinion stating that pregnancy is not specifically covered in current law. Case law is open to interpretation, so any decision made by the current court can be readily reversed by future courts as new judges are seated (four judges are retiring in the next five years and four judges constitute the majority of the Supreme Court). Such reversal or change of opinion would mean that the Florida Civil Rights Act would no longer include pregnancy as a basis for discrimination. Should this happen, the Florida Legislature will, once again, be considering legislation to clarify that Florida law includes pregnancy as a basis of discrimination.

While the judiciary exists to interpret, construe and apply the laws as written, the Legislature is the lawmaking branch of government. Chapter 760, F.S., as currently written, has been interpreted differently by various courts over the past several years with regard to the pregnancy issue. Does the Legislature really want the courts making the laws for our state?

Mario Valle, chair, Florida Commission on Human Relations, Tallahassee

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • Redistricting redux

    One need to look no further than the Aug. 12 piece Challenges expected on approved maps on redistricting that shows Florida’s Legislature simply cannot be trusted to impartially and apolitically draw legislative districts. When the House Redistricting Committee chairman, Republican Rep. Richard Corcoran (in addressing the revised Congressional map previously found unconstitutional) says, “If that is a Republican map, I’m proudly and utterly guilty of doing that,” then it’s clear the Legislature is unwilling and unable to enact the Fair Districts amendments. It’s high time for the courts, or a nonpartisan third party, step in to craft legislative districts.

  • Floating courthouse?

    I suppose the new courthouse (in the unlikely event its funding is approved by the citizens) will be elevated to account for sea level rise predicted by all local climate experts. Where will its users come from as the sea inundates the densely populated coastal areas of Miami-Dade while state and local governments played the proverbial Nero’s fiddle? We have limited funds; let’s prioritize wisely and put survival of our community ahead of the admittedly dire needs of the justice system.

  • Lifetime Rocket fan

    I read with disgust the letter that Coach Roland Smith of Miami Central High received from a Hoover football fan. I have been an educator my entire life and I’ve tried to eradicate the ignorance of judging someone for the color of their skin. My mentor and best friend in the school system for years was Percy Oliver, a black All-American football player from Illinois who became principal and head of athletics for Miami-Dade County Public Schools. He became my dad after my father died, and we never let the color of our skin determine the limits or boundaries of our friendship.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category