Miami Herald | EDITORIAL

Release the CIA’s torture report

How much should the American public be allowed to know about the use of torture and other forms of cruelty practiced by U.S. interrogators against captives of the war on terror? Everything.

In the wake of the September 11 attacks, the Bush administration relied on controversial legal justifications dutifully supplied by the Justice Department to figuratively (and perhaps literally) put the screws to every known and suspected terrorist held in “black sites” around the world by the CIA.

Exactly what was done in the name of protecting U.S. national security is not known. Although the use of torture came under severe criticism from the moment the first reports surfaced, most Americans appeared to support doing whatever was necessary to avoid another series of disastrous attacks.

But was the torture worth it? Did the use of torture to gain information from terrorist suspects make the nation safer, or was the government’s embrace of a morally reprehensible tactic unnecessary?

It depends on whom you ask.

A 6,200-page classified report produced by the Senate Intelligence Committee concludes that in 20 separate cases the staff investigated, the same information could have been obtained without resorting to brutal methods. The report, which took four years to compile, claims torture failed to produce significant intelligence and did not prevent further attacks.

It also says the agency mismanaged the program and repeatedly provided false information to the Department of Justice, impeding a proper legal analysis of the torture and detention project. Interrogators, the report contends, used methods not approved by government lawyers and CIA headquarters and evaded effective oversight by the White House.

John Rizzo, the CIA former top lawyer, told the McClatchy Washington Bureau that the Senate report is wrong. He said interrogations under torture yielded “detailed, valuable information into terrorist plots.” The claim that the agency supplied inaccurate details about the program is also false, Mr. Rizzo said.

It is impossible to know who is telling the truth unless the public is allowed to see significant portions of the report. The Senate panel voted to release a 400-page summary, but has allowed the White House — with the aid of the CIA and the Pentagon — to delete whatever they deem too sensitive for public consumption.

The White House should waste no time getting it out, nor should the CIA and other interested agencies have free rein to censor whatever they choose. Their involvement must be limited and deletions should be kept to a minimum because the details that have leaked out so far are troubling at every level, including the use of torture methods that went well beyond waterboarding.

The claim that torture was not effective goes to the heart of the issue. Few today contend that torture is anything but immoral, but from the outset the program has been defended as necessary and effective. Unless the report is released without significant censorship, how is the public to judge?

The government must not pass up this chance to come clean. President Obama put a stop to the torture program in 2009, but that shouldn’t be the end of it. In hindsight, it may have been not only immoral and unjustified, but ineffective to boot.

Releasing the report can have a curative effect. It should become the first step in fixing accountability for mistakes, and ensuring that it can never happen again.

Read more Editorials stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category