Urge U.S. to review legal justification for drone use

 

Similar stories:

Reuters

* Urge U.S. to review legal justification for drone use

* Call for prosecution of Bush-era abductions, torture (Adds details, quotes)

A U.N. human rights watchdog called on the Obama administration on Thursday to review its use of drones to kill suspected al-Qaeda and Taliban militants abroad and reveal how it chose its targets.

In its first report on Washington's rights record since 2006, it also called for the prosecution of anyone who ordered or carried out killings, abductions and torture under a CIA program at the time of President George W. Bush, and to keep a promise to close the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay.

U.S. officials did not immediately comment on the findings of the U.N. Human Rights Committee, which is made up of 18 independent experts.

The Obama administration increased the number of drone strikes after taking office in 2009 but attacks have dropped off in the last year. It has been under pressure from affected governments, the United Nations and activists to rein in the strikes and do more to protect civilians.

The United States should give more information on how it decided someone was enough of an “imminent threat” to be targeted in covert operations in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia and other countries, the report said.

It should “revisit its position regarding legal justifications for the use of deadly force through drone attacks,” investigate any abuses and compensate victims' families, the committee added in its conclusions.

The committee also called for more investigations into intelligence operations launched by the administration of President George W. Bush in the wake of the Sept. 11 2001 attacks on America.

Critics say the CIA program used harsh interrogation methods, including “waterboarding” or simulated drowning, that constituted torture banned by international law.

There has only been a limited number of investigations into “unlawful killings … and the use of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment of detainees in U.S. custody, including outside its territory, as part of the so-called ‘enhanced interrogation techniques' program,” it said.

The report welcomed Obama's order in January 2009 to end the CIA program.

But it noted with concern that all reported investigations into alleged abuses were closed in 2012 “leading only to a meagre number of criminal charges brought against low-level operatives.”

The panel said many details of the CIA program remained secret, hindering accountability and redress for victims.

In an apparent reference to lawyers who drew up memos justifying the Bush-era interrogation techniques, it said: “The responsibility of those who provided legal pretexts for manifestly illegal behaviour should also be established.”

The U.N. experts also voiced concern at the U.S. use of the death penalty and in particular “racial disparities in its imposition that affects disproportionately African Americans.”

They regretted mandatory detention of immigrants for prolonged periods of time, deportations of immigrants and the “exclusion of millions of undocumented immigrants and their children from coverage under the Affordable Care Act.”

The 18 experts examined U.S. compliance with a landmark treaty on civil and political rights at a two-day session earlier this month.

Washington says the pact does not apply to U.S. extraterritorial operations, facilities or officials holding suspects abroad in the context of the U.S.-led “war on terror”.

The U.N. committee again urged the United States to interpret the treaty “in good faith” and acknowledge that it applied to U.S. operations and personnel abroad.

“It is not just the committee position and the World Court position, it is the position of very many states,” chairman Nigel Rodley, a British law professor, told the March 14 talks.

Read more Nation stories from the Miami Herald

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category