No, the rest of the world is right

When Cubans on the island — including the Cuban government — say, “The whole world is wrong, and we are right,” they say it with a joking irony. In Miami, we Cuban Americans echo the same sentiment and use the same phrase with regard to the Cuban embargo, but, sadly, we mean it.

That senseless mantra, ensconced in U.S. policy toward Cuba, has led the United States to refuse to play ball with Cuba — as we have with China, with Vietnam and with other less than scrupulous regimes — and simply let the ball play us, in the guise of a dissident’s suicide, a violent shoot-down of unarmed aircrafts, a new wave of repression and incarcerations, whenever a bearded Providence throws the ball at us.

We do not seem to understand that it is in the Cuban regime’s interest for us to continue in this reactive mode whenever the ball hits us, which is usually when we least expect it to. It can afford to be ironic about its being right and the whole world wrong. The regime is in control, we are not. We have not accomplished anything in more than 50 years of dismissing what the rest of the world thinks of our policy toward Cuba, and we will not until we see the irony in it and decide to change it.

Either there is no real embargo/blockade, which can have a starving impact on Cuba, or the United States — with the support of a couple of U.N. General Assembly members like Palau, because Israel is not blockading Cuba either, despite its usual “solidarity vote” in the long-running play the annual rite of voting against U.S. sanctions has become — should hold on to it in order to starve them of a cash influx, as some believe. But you cannot have it both ways.

It is senseless for the United States to hold on to the all-but-symbolic embargo, only because some deeply hurt and, unfortunately, bitter, hard-nosed — and well-heeled — players in the Cuban-American exile community cannot live with the idea of either Castro eventually crowing over its demise, and they are willing to put their money where their collective ego is. By so doing, they are holding hostage this and future generations of Cuban youths, people like blogger Yoani Sanchez, who couldn’t care less about bragging rights among the members of their grand-parent’s generation.

Lifting the American embargo would help those within the regime in Havana who want to move in a more liberal direction. Such a change in the atmosphere of what has been, for more than 50 years, an incomprehensibly barren “relationship” for both Cuba and the United States is likely to open minds (maybe even doors) inside Cuba. Something like a photograph of Fidel besides Pope John Paul II years ago (Fidel with Hillary? With Obama?), may undermine those who are prone to choose repression over liberalism. It will also do wonders for the U.S. relationship with the rest of its hemispheric neighbors.

So who benefits from keeping the embargo in place? Petty politicians, who feed from the hands of the pro-embargo camp.

A recent poll — immediately vilified by wonks from the Reagan era and other worn-out right-handed pitchers, lobbyists or experts from the traditional Cuban-exile bullpen, shows that most Americans (even Cuban Americans, and an even larger majority of South Floridians) want the embargo gone.

Clinging to the embargo makes our hailed democracy something ever more difficult to explain, not to mention export.

President Obama should take heart. There are many things he can do to tear it down, even if in stages, especially if he recognizes the embargo for what it is and wrestles it away from those who have, for many years, used it to get elected to local governments and school boards.

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

 <span class="cutline_leadin">GAZA DESTRUCTION:</span> Palestinians sit amid the rubble of a building this week while attending a “victory rally” organized by the military wing of Hamas.


    People of Gaza must be helped

    Now that the guns have fallen silent, leaders of Israel and Hamas are busy trying to convince their respective peoples that they emerged victorious from this 50-day war.

 <span class="cutline_leadin">LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE:</span> The rise of a terrorist state in the Middle East may be the defining crisis of President Obama’s presidency.


    Obama too detached to lead?

    Having once served a president, I don’t begrudge any president a vacation. There is, in fact, no escape from this relentless job. A change of scenery does not involve a change in responsibilities, or even a release from the essence of the president’s routine.



    Up close and personal with migrant children in Dade school

    This year, on the first day of the academic calendar, I kicked off the day at Francis Tucker Elementary in Coconut Grove donating book bags and supplies to excited kindergartners in this historic and economically fragile neighborhood of the City of Miami.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category