Ana Veciana-Suarez: The story of Marissa Alexander: When justice is blind, deaf and dumb

 

Add this to the ever-expanding list of ludicrous decisions, ridiculous incidents and moments that defy the most basic elements of common sense.

Marissa Alexander, a 33-year-old Florida woman accused of firing what she called a warning shot at her estranged husband, could serve up to 60 years in prison. This is courtesy of a convoluted state justice system that accepts self-defense arguments in the most outlandish cases but not others, while also demanding minimum mandatory sentences that leave judges with few options.

If Alexander is convicted, she will go to prison, unlike George Zimmerman, who was acquitted of murdering Trayvon Martin last year in Florida. She may even serve more time than Michael Dunn, who was rewarded with a hung jury that couldn’t convict him of killing unarmed 17-year-old Jordan Davis. (Strangely enough, he was convicted of three charges of attempted murder.)

Does this make sense to anybody?

For a change, let’s leave race out of it. But we must, for sure, insert gender. While two men successfully argued that they feared for their lives, Alexander could not claim the same defense when her abusive husband came after her, a husband with a history of domestic battery and a restraining order on his head to prove it.

You bet that if I were Alexander, I’d fear for my life. So would you. But apparently some legal minds, including that of the judge who ruled that Alexander probably wasn’t in “genuine fear” of her life, think differently.

Alexander’s case sounds eerily familiar to advocates of battered women. Less than 10 days after giving birth to a premature baby girl, Alexander was threatened by Rico Gray, who returned to their Jacksonville home and accused her of infidelity. When she hid in a bathroom, Gray broke down the door and choked her. Then, after she fled again, Gray allegedly threatened to kill her. When he came after her, she fired the shot with her legally owned gun.

Insisting that Alexander had fired out of anger not fear, State Attorney Angela Corey charged Alexander in 2010 with three counts of aggravated assault against Gray and two children in the home. Because Florida has mandatory penalties for crimes involving a gun, Alexander received the mandatory 20 years.

That 2012 conviction was overturned by the First District Court of Appeal, which found that the presiding judge had wrongly instructed jurors that Alexander had to prove her claim of self-defense. After 21 months in jail, she was released, but Corey promptly refiled the same charges. A new trial is set for July 28 and now, because of a change in the law that requires sentences to be served consecutively, not concurrently, Alexander faces the possibility of serving triple the time for a crime she shouldn’t have been charged with anyway.

The brazen injustice of the case has attracted national attention, and rightly so. The Free Marissa Now campaign has condemned Corey’s office. State legislators are drawing up bills to tinker with mandatory sentencing and opponents of the Stand Your Ground Law are holding up the Alexander case as yet another example of the flaws in that dubious legislation.

All well and good, but in the meantime, a woman who was battered by a man must live with the knowledge that she may spend the rest of her life in jail. And the abuser?

I couldn’t find any report about Rico Gray’s whereabouts. But this stuck in my craw: In a deposition, he told police: “I got five baby mamas and I [hit] every last one of them, except for one.”

Does this imbalance of justice make sense to anybody?

Read more Lifestyle stories from the Miami Herald

  • Teens, young adults using melatonin more

    Melatonin is growing in popularity among teens and young adults who are trying to regulate their sleep cycle, but experts say using good sleep hygiene such as sticking to a consistent sleep-and-wake schedule is a better solution.

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">MOMENTS BEFORE TRAGEDY:</span> A  video  shows the girl, in pink shorts and braided ponytail, with her hands clutched around the grip of the submachine gun.

    In My Opinion

    Ana Veciana-Suarez: A 9-year-old with an Uzi? That’s crazy

    There is nothing, absolutely nothing logical or sensible or worthwhile in having a 9-year-old learn to use an Uzi. No reason, none whatsoever, for a child to handle a fully automatic gun.

  • Wine

    Marvelous malbec deserves to be discovered

    In a restaurant in Buenos Aires, I ordered a “half” parrillada, so they plunked down only about five pounds of beef on the grill on my table.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category