Film

Culture critic examines the lasting appeal of ‘Network’

 
 
 <span class="cutline_leadin">Mad As Hell: </span>The Making of Network and the Fateful Vision of the Angriest Man In Movies. Dave Itzkoff. Times. 304 pages. $27.
Mad As Hell: The Making of Network and the Fateful Vision of the Angriest Man In Movies. Dave Itzkoff. Times. 304 pages. $27.

When audiences left theaters in 1976 after viewing Network, a film about a deranged or messianic newscaster and his ratings-mad producers, they were surely aware that they had just witnessed the product of uncommon artistic vision. What they might not have realized was that one of the film’s most unique moments occurs during the opening credits.

Before the names of the stars (Robert Duvall and Faye Dunaway among them) or the famous director (Sidney Lumet), the viewer sees “By Paddy Chayefsky,” an honor rarely shown to a screenwriter.

That his name would be featured so prominently is testament not only to his genius but also to his uncompromising drive to see his message brought to the screen exactly as it had sprung from his fingers onto the page. New York Times culture critic Dave Itzkoff documents this journey wonderfully in his new book.

In Mad as Hell, Itzkoff tells the story, lovingly and in depth, of the creation of a brilliant and important movie that would almost certainly never be made today. We see the force of Chayefsky’s will as boon and hindrance, able to blast through the barriers to the movie’s completion while sometimes alienating potential allies. His insistence that his message not be diluted bordered on the mania of his most indelible character, Howard Beale, who yells into a news camera, live on the air, “I’m as mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more!”

There are also many interesting moments from the set, such as Robert Duvall mooning pedestrians down on Sixth Avenue from the network offices between takes or the special light constructed to keep Chayefsky, who liked to be close to the action to ensure that the actors stuck to his script, from wandering in front of the main lighting.

Network stands so strongly because it is a movie-out-of-time. In 1976, it was an ironic commentary on the state of the American people, with the bloodthirsty element of the news media played up to farcical levels as a projection of the public’s desires. By 2014, the movie is more like a mirror held up to the news programming on networks dedicated to partisan audiences, with ratings as the fickle king.

Network was seen by many as a scathing assault on broadcast news media and the culture of conformity, but Itzkoff makes a convincing argument that Chayefsky was only using the news as a metaphor to reflect the degeneracy of empathy and decency. He was saddened when news media leaders took offense and even apologized. In a letter to Walter Cronkite (whose daughter appeared in the film in the role of a Patty Hearst-like character) Chayefsky wrote: “I never meant this film to be an attack on television as an institution in itself, but only as a metaphor for the rest of the times.”

Later, to an audience of students, he elaborated: “My rage isn’t against television. It’s against the dehumanization of people.”

The book is perhaps a bit light on analysis, and Itzkoff doesn’t mount much of a personal interpretation of the film until close to the end. There is also precious little criticism in terms of suggesting where the filmmakers might have made missteps.

But occasionally, hagiography is necessary. Howard Beale is after all a modern saint — somehow more modern today than the day he was created — or at least a holy fool. He deserves to have his story told as deftly as Itzkoff has told it here.

Nicholas Mancusi is a writer in New York.

Read more Books stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">STONE MATTRESS: </span>Nine Tales. Margaret Atwood. Nan A. Talese. Doubleday. 288 pages. $25.95.

    Stories

    Past looms large in new stories from Margaret Atwood

    In Margaret Atwood’s new collection, the past looms large for aging protagonists, but sympathy and regret abound, too.

  • What are you reading now?

    “I just finished Claire DeWitt and The City of the Dead by Sara Gran, which I love, love, loved. It’s a mystery set in New Orleans shortly after the storm and solved by girl detective, Claire DeWitt, who applies her special method of detection which is pretty much based on yoga and Buddhism combined with the altered mind states of drugs, drink, dreams and growing up in Brooklyn.”

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">WHAT STAYS IN VEGAS:</span> The World of Personal Data — Lifeblood of Big Business C — and the End of Privacy as We Know It. Adam Tanner. PublicAffairs. 316 pages. $27.99.

    Nonfiction

    ‘What Stays in Vegas’ examines data packaging and the end of privacy

    Journalist explains how data packaging makes American companies the biggest threat to privacy.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category