The readers’ forum

Everglades restoration must be completed

 

With all the recent stories about new projects and bridges to move more water into Everglades National Park, we should all feel good about the fruits of our collective resolve to protect and restore the environment. What we haven’t read about are the shortcomings of these same projects to deliver on the other promise that goes along with restoring the Everglades, which is to protect the private property, local economy and the way of life in the areas affected by these projects in south Miami-Dade County.

This winter, farmers across South Miami-Dade have lost crops, or been unable to plant, due to an unusually high water table. A significant contributing factor is that Everglades restoration projects have languished for years in a partially completed state. The “interim operations” for those projects have not only achieved little of the restoration benefit that justified them, but have also failed to protect local farmers.

For almost a century, the hallmark of South Miami-Dade has been its agricultural economy and landscape. The community of small farmers has been an important producer of winter vegetables, tropical fruit, and other crops. Many of Miami’s best restaurants serve locally-grown organic fruit and vegetables as part of the “farm to table” movement. Farmers need reliable flood protection every year because when the water table nears the ground surface, roots rot and plants die. We have lost thousands of avocado trees just in the last few years to diseases brought on by high water.

Everglades restoration projects were designed to avoid this problem. Everglades National Park needs water, and when water leaks out of the park into South Miami-Dade, as it now does every day, it makes the Everglades too dry and the agricultural area too wet. Two projects were designed to address both of these problems. The C-111 Project has been mostly built, and is capable of raising the water level in the park and improving conditions in the agricultural areas east of Everglades National Park. Similarly, the Modified Water Deliveries Project features are fully functional, yet there is no approved operating plan that would let the water flow. However, water managers have failed to implement the Modified Water Deliveries Project as designed, and have used its features to send water from the Water Conservation Areas into the South Miami-Dade canals, rather than let that water flow into Everglades National Park as intended.

Everglades restoration can be, and must be, a win-win for both the environment and South Miami-Dade farmers, but so far it feels more like a lose-lose. It is time for federal and state water management agencies to start harvesting the environmental benefits of the billion dollars spent on these two projects and at the same time delivering on the promise of better water control for the agricultural economy of South Miami-Dade.

Rep. Katie Edwards, Plantation

Rep. Holly Raschein, Key Largo

Read more Letters to the Editor stories from the Miami Herald

  • The readers’ forum

    We knew PAMM would need help

    Re Dusty Melton’s Sept. 12 Other Views column, PAMM shouldn’t get public funding: Consistently, both the public and private supporters of the Pérez Art Museum Miami have made explicit disclosure that additional operating support would be necessary to support a brilliant, larger museum.

  • Save on energy costs

    Florida’s unrelenting heat is often felt in our utility bills. In addition to finding ways to decrease your energy use, you may want to consider products and appliances that use less energy and water. An upcoming tax-free holiday on many energy-efficient appliances and water-saving products will help you do just that. This tax-free holiday runs from Sept. 19-21.

  • Passport to ride

    On Sept. 12, letter writer, Golden Passport misuse, Floreal de la Garza wrote regarding the fare-free Golden Passport program. I would like to clarify some of the claims made about this program, which benefits so many in our community. The Golden Passport program that existed prior to the approval of the People’s Transportation Plan in 2002 had an income requirement. Under the current Golden Passport program, a permanent Miami-Dade resident who is 65 years of age or older is eligible to receive a Golden Passport, regardless of income. Permanent Miami-Dade residents who are Social Security beneficiaries, regardless of age, also qualify.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category