PLO/MIDEAST

PLO Ambassador: Our vision of peace

 
 
AREIKAT
AREIKAT

plodelegation.us

As the efforts to bridge the gaps between Palestinians and Israelis over a framework agreement approach a critical juncture, we Palestinians want to say that we greatly appreciate the efforts extended by Secretary of State John Kerry and the U.S. administration.

The United States has not yet submitted anything in writing, so it would be premature to jump to conclusions. But as we have repeatedly said, no one stands to gain more from the success of these efforts than the Palestinians who have been suffering under Israeli military occupation for the last 47 years.

It’s important for people to know how far the Palestinians have come to put an end to the conflict with Israel. In 1988, the Palestine National Council took the historic step of recognizing U.N. resolutions 242 and 338, presenting our historic compromise to resolve the conflict by explicitly accepting the establishment of a Palestinian state in the West Bank including East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip — 22 percent of what used to be the historic land of Palestine.

In 1993, and upon the signing of the Oslo Accords, the PLO and Israel exchanged mutual letters of recognition. We remain committed to the strategic objective of having an independent, sovereign, viable, and contiguous Palestinian state that can live side by side with Israel in peace and security.

The Palestinian leadership has shown serious and sincere willingness to deal with all the complex issues separating Palestinians from Israelis. .

• Borders: Any future Palestinian state will be based on the 1967 borders with agreed minor and reciprocal (in quantity and quality) land swaps. This is not only a Palestinian position but rather a U.S. and an international position.

• Security: The Palestinians have indicated that they will accept a state with limited military capabilities that will ensure security for Palestinians and control of its borders. We are also willing to accept the presence of third parties, such as NATO, to provide support and to guarantee security for Palestinians and Israelis. The idea of an open-ended Israeli military presence, other than during the phased Israeli withdrawal, is not acceptable.

• Jerusalem: Palestinians have been very creative in finding a solution to the issue of a shared and opened Jerusalem that will include East Jerusalem as the capital of the Palestinian state and West Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. The old city of Jerusalem will be under a joint Palestinian-Israeli supervision that will guarantee the religious rights of all followers of the three major faiths: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

• Settlements: By definition of international law and the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, settlements are illegal. The United States and the entire world oppose illegal settlement activities. Any solution to the issue of settlements must take into account the above facts.

• Refugees: To Palestinians, the refugee problem is the core component of the Palestinian historical narrative regarding our conflict with Israel. The Arab Peace Initiative of 2002, which was supported by the Palestinians, and 57 Arab and Muslim countries, affirmed the need to arrive at “a just solution to the Palestinian refugee problem to be agreed upon in accordance with U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194.” It is our responsibility to end their plight and provide them with a dignified future away from their life in exile.

• Water: Everybody agrees that water is an existential problem in a region with scarce resources. The current unjust distribution of water between Israelis and Palestinians, which stands at 70 liters per capita per day for Palestinians compared to 300 for the average Israeli, cannot be sustained. There must be an agreement on fair distribution of water shares according to existing international water conventions and treaties.

The Palestinian people aspire to a future of dignity and freedom and peaceful coexistence with all their neighbors. The continued Israeli military occupation breeds violence and turmoil in a region that is witnessing a major transformation for a long period to come. Any chance to influence this transformation by both Israelis and Palestinians will be hindered by the absence of peace between them.

A future Palestinian state plans to be a constructive and important regional player with the focus of safeguarding the whole region from all the winds of instability. We want to be partners with our neighbors and not a threat to any of them.

However, in order to do that, we have to defuse all the root causes that have created tension and confrontation in the first place. I am sure that the day will come when our region will be once again an oasis of tolerance, peace, prosperity, and cooperation for the good of all of its peoples.

Ambassador Maen Rashid Areikat is the chief representative of the PLO Delegation to the United States.

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
DE LA O

    A JUDGE’S VIEW

    Judge has faith in the law, and in human potential

    I am a circuit judge in Miami-Dade County serving in the criminal division. Every day, I make decisions about whether to release defendants who are awaiting trial and whose families rely on them for basic needs; whether to grant requests by victims of domestic violence to remove stay-away orders that keep their families apart; and whether to sentence convicted defendants to prison, house arrest or probation.

  •  
MCT

    JUDICIAL ELECTIONS

    There’s got to be a better way to seat judges

    When I think of the traits that are essential for someone to be a good judge, I immediately identify characteristics such as legal ability and understanding of legal principles, courtroom experience, record and reputation, temperament and community involvement. As a Miami-Dade County voter, and as someone who has served on several endorsement panels for various organizations, I have serious concerns about the quality of the candidates that are running for this very important post. I also have reservations about the election process through which we are selecting the members of our lower courts.

  •  
Jack Orr cast the only vote in the Florida Legislature in support of school integration.

    JOHN B. ORR

    A man of vision, principle — and flaws

    It was 1956, and the Florida Legislature was considering a bill to get around the U.S. Supreme Court ruling barring racial segregation in schools. Only one of the 90 House members voted against the bill — a young lawyer from Miami named Jack Orr.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category