The global war on drugs has failed

 

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are said to have cost the U.S. taxpayer over $4 trillion since 2001. As we know, it has not ended terrorism, and many would argue that neither country has found peace or security. I’m in Miami to talk about another war that has cost over $1 trillion. It’s also a failed war. It’s the so-called “war on drugs,” a phrase coined by President Nixon more than four decades ago.

Given Florida’s proximity to Latin America, the community here has been touched by the drug wars. My fellow board members at the Global Commission on Drug Policy, including the former Presidents of Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico, have all come together along with other political and civil society leaders to reform existing global drug laws.

There are far too many people who still think locking up non-violent drug offenders is a good idea. That’s why we must learn about the issues and figure out how to approach this challenge from a more humane perspective. It costs too much money and too many lives not to do so.

The critically acclaimed documentary Breaking the Taboo lays out the reasons why we need a new approach to drug policy. Despite more than 40 years of prohibition, illicit drugs remain one of the most valuable industries in the world (after food and oil) — an industry entirely under the control of criminals. Drugs are cheaper and more available than ever before. Millions of people are in prison for drugs offenses. Corruption and violence, especially in producer and transit countries, endanger democracy. Tens of thousands of people die each year in drug wars. Speaking in Breaking the Taboo, former President Bill Clinton admits, “Obviously if the expected results were that we would eliminate serious drug use in America and eliminate the narco-trafficking networks, it hasn’t worked.”

There are other issues to consider: Although rates of drug use and selling are comparable across racial lines, people of color — Latinos, African Americans, etc. — are far more likely to be stopped, searched, arrested, prosecuted, convicted and incarcerated for drug law violations.

Spending tax dollars on incarceration means not spending those same tax dollars on other more effective alternative approaches. Florida taxpayers are forced to spend nearly $100 million annually to incarcerate drug offenders serving mandatory minimum sentences. Imagine if that that same money were available to be spent on education, health and rehabilitation. The future of our nations, our children and the next generation should be our priority. We should be helping people addicted to drugs break their habits rather than putting users in prison.

Last month’s Florida Supreme Court ruling means medical marijuana legalization is on the ballot later this year. About 70 percent of Floridians support more progressive marijuana laws such as legalizing medical cannabis and decriminalizing penalties for marijuana, and that’s a very good sign. It may be a tough fight to get this law passed as it did in other states such as Washington and Colorado (where Latino voters may have been the deciding factor, with 70 percent in support) but Florida has already demonstrated itself as a leader in tackling drug issues.

The first drug court in the United States was set up in 1989 right here in Miami-Dade County. In fact, Florida has 93 drug courts, which is a great example of success, and the facts support that. A recent evaluation of drug courts in Florida by the Sentencing Project concluded that Florida had a substantially lower re-arrest rate for drug court graduates relative to a comparison group during a span of 24 months. This is exactly the kind rational, sensible approach that voters must demand.

It has been argued that the damages caused by prohibiting drugs to public safety, public health, and civil liberties exceed the damages caused by the drugs themselves. Reinvesting in alternatives in drug reform is anything but simple — nonetheless the results will be better. It’s time to break the taboo.

Sir Richard Branson is the founder of the Virgin Group.

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • Secession, a tournament for GOP

    March’s NCAA playoffs are behind us but the madness continues.

  • Vladimir Putin’s terrific, triumphant, all good, totally awesome year

    Admit it. You wish you were Vladimir Putin right now. Enemies fear him. Allies are grateful to him. Women are drawn to him. Jimmy Fallon imitates him. Even Edward Snowden wants to be his video buddy. To paraphrase that great geopolitical analyst Alicia Keys, this guy is on fire.

  • Will Chelsea Clinton’s baby be president one day?

    Last week Chelsea Clinton announced she was pregnant, and immediately political reporters began to complain about the “Clinton dynasty.” “Can you say dynasty?” wrote the staff of the Week magazine. Those words were echoed quickly by the Wire, which answered the question of when the gestating child would be eligible for the White House. (2053, if you’re wondering.)

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category