STATE OF THE UNION

Obama’s era of limits

 
 
President Obama leaves the House chamber after delivering his State of the Union address.
President Obama leaves the House chamber after delivering his State of the Union address.
AP

doyle.mcmanus@latimes.com

The rap against President Obama’s State of the Union address was that his agenda, once ambitious and transformational, has suddenly turned modest.

Instead of grand bargains and sweeping change, the president proposed holding a summit meeting on working families and extracting a promise from colleges to admit more low-income students — not exactly sweeping solutions to middle-class stagnation and college debt.

What happened to the visionary politician who promised that his inauguration would mark the moment the rise of the oceans began to slow?

Simple: Reality has sunk in.

In year six of Obama’s presidency, modest proposals are the most appropriate offering. At the moment, the president has much to be modest about — and no real alternative.

Any ability Obama might have had to navigate Washington’s poisonous political culture to forge consensus on sweeping initiatives vanished when Republicans took over the House of Representatives in 2010.

And the president’s sway has ebbed even further since his re-election in 2012, thanks to the chaotic launch of his health insurance program and the economy’s stubborn failure to produce enough new jobs.

With Obama’s job-approval rating stuck well below 50 percent, Republicans in Congress see plenty of reasons to oppose him but only danger in helping him.

Obama still has big goals, of course, which he listed in his speech: immigration reform, early childhood education, infrastructure spending, raising the minimum wage, even the lost cause of gun control. But he listed all of those in his speech last year — and achieved none of them.

That’s why the president’s embrace of things he can do without Congress makes sense. Expect to see more executive orders, more White House summits and more private sector arm-twisting.

Obama’s chief image maker, Dan Pfeiffer, deployed two phrases to dramatize this new strategy. The president “has a pen,” he said, meaning the power to issue executive orders, and he “has a phone,” meaning the ability to persuade corporate CEOs, college presidents and others to do the right thing.

This will be “a year of action,” Pfeiffer added — as opposed, presumably, to a year of stalled initiatives on Capitol Hill.

Obama offered insight into how he has accepted his newfound limits in a recent interview with David Remnick of the New Yorker.

“We cannot remake the world entirely during this little stretch that we have,” the president said. “At the end of the day, we’re part of a long-running story. We just try to get our paragraph right.”

That doesn’t mean he'll quit trying, and bipartisan legislation on one big issue might still be possible: immigration reform. House Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, has said he wants to try to pass a series of immigration bills this year, and Obama says he’s willing to make a deal.

But expect downsized ambition to be the order of the day. Obama might still like to see a federal minimum wage of $10.10 an hour. But because that seems unlikely to pass the Republican House, it looks as if he'll have to settle for the far more modest change he announced Tuesday: raising the minimum wage by executive order to $10.10 for federal contract workers.

That may be frustrating for a president who lamented in his speech that “corporate profits and stock prices have rarely been higher, and those at the top have never done better. But average wages have barely budged. Inequality has deepened. Upward mobility has stalled.

“Our job is to reverse these trends,” he declared.

But failing in that, as he seems likely to do, the president promised Tuesday to look for incremental ways to chip away at the gap between rich and poor.

And he will console himself with earlier victories. Already, at the White House, there’s a sense that the main work of the Obama administration is mostly complete.

“If you look at the whole eight years. the biggest and most important thing is coming back from the brink of economic disaster,” one of Obama’s aides told me this week. “And then healthcare. Those are the biggest changes we will see if we look back 10 years from now.

“Immigration will fall into that category, if we get it,” the aide added. But other priorities such as preschool education and job training programs aren’t likely to grow beyond a few micro-initiatives.

Still, if Obama can make his health-care program work, avoid new economic or international problems and help his party retain control of the Senate — no small tasks — he'll count 2014 as a success.

So yes, it’s a modest agenda. But gauged by what’s doable in the second term of an eight-year presidency, it is also a realistic one.

©2014 Los Angeles Times

Read more Other Views stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
SHARPLESS

    DETAINED IMMIGRANTS

    Dade, Broward lead the way

    Miami-Dade and Broward county jails have stopped detaining immigrants for the federal government at taxpayers’ expense. Florida’s other jails and prisons should do the same.

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">GANG WARFARE</span>: The end of a truce between street gangs in El Salvador has led to a steep rise in homicides this year, adding impetus to the migration of youths and children to the United States.

    MIGRANT CRISIS

    The real failure in Central America

    The failure to manage the crisis of Central American child refugees at the Mexican border is not only about the inability to enact a comprehensive immigration policy reform. The real problem is the failure to build transparent and competent criminal justice institutions in Central America, especially after millions of American dollars have been provided to reform and strengthen security institutions there.

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">EXULTING:</span> Vladimir Putin is still refusing to accept complicity in the shootdown of a Malaysian airliner as Western leaders fail to agree on sanctions.

    WESTERN LEADERS

    Historians will recall our leaders’ inaction

    When historians look back on 2014, they will note not just how flagrantly Vladimir Putin disregarded international law or how stubbornly Gaza and Israel kept firing missiles at each other. They will also be puzzled at how poorly the United States handled its economy.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category