On social issues, let’s stop trying to read King’s mind


Martin Luther King Jr. Day is coming up, and you know what that means: lots of talk about who has to go to work and who doesn’t. Plentiful “I Have a Dream” recitations. An annual reminder to elementary school kids across the country that it’s not nice to judge people based on the color of their skin.

And there will be lots of conversation about how the late civil rights leader would feel about everything that’s happening in 2014.

Can we skip that part this year?

Now, I’ve been as guilty as the next person of falling back on the “What would MLK say today?” shtick. Just last year I used red-carpet interviews to ask BET Honors attendees what King would make of current offerings in black entertainment. I practically forced them to try imagining a 1968 preacher’s shake-my-head response to, say, Bravo’s presentation of black women. Cringe. In retrospect, it was neither interesting nor revealing because it had very little to do with the man himself.

Plenty of analysis around last year’s 50th-anniversary March on Washington took a similar approach. We were treated to assessments of what King would think about “40 years of legal abortion,” black America, America in general, George Zimmerman’s trial, “education as the gateway out of poverty” and more. A PolicyMic.com piece even made up modern-day King quotes. (Its disclaimer – “Please note: This piece isn’t reflective of my views or King’s views. Rather, it reflects my view of King’s views” – pretty much says it all.)

It doesn’t stop with politics or racial issues, either. Amateur psychic mediums have checked in with King about topics from bullying to rap music and pedophilia in the church. (Spoiler alert: He wouldn’t be a fan of child molesters.)

But I’d like it if we backed away from this approach to honoring King’s legacy. Here’s why: We Really Don’t Know What He’d Say

Sure, we can speculate. King was progressive. He was for equality and for African-Americans and all Americans.

We can take these general principles and extrapolate in a very rough way. But if the real question is “What would a progressive say?” why not just ask that? Trying to get into any more detail is tough because King’s take on specific issues, tactics and priorities is, like most people’s, hard to freeze in time.

“He was constantly evolving in his thoughts, and that evolution would have continued to impact his politics,” says Hasan Jeffries, an Ohio State University history professor. Jeffries points to the way King “trailed his wife, who’d already participated in anti-war protests years earlier” before finally making the Riverside Church declaration against the Vietnam War, getting himself cut off from more-conservative civil rights activists. It’s evidence that neither King’s positions nor his alliances were static.

Then there was the famous bus boycott, whose very objectives, Jeffries explains, evolved from better treatment for blacks within a segregated system to complete integration. Naturally, as his reality and his adversaries changed, so did his positions and his goals.

And even when it comes to people who are living today, it’s not as if everyone on the left, everyone who was active in the civil rights movement or all black politicians or activists are of the same mind when it comes to contemporary issues. Where would he stand on education reform? The Affordable Care Act? What about President Barack Obama’s responsibility to African-Americans in an environment that could be seen as the embodiment of King’s dreams but that goes hand in hand with racialized political potholes he couldn’t have imagined? “Scandal”? Your guess is as good as mine.

“Dead people make great heroes because they can’t speak for themselves, so you can project onto them whatever you want,” says Jeffries. And when it comes to hijacking King’s legacy, he adds, “Conservatives have really taken that and run with it.” (One example: those highly questionable “Martin Luther King, Jr. Was a Republican. Vote Republican!” billboards.)

We can all agree that King wouldn’t be thrilled to be featured on a ladies-free-before-midnight “No Worries Bash” club flier because, well, no one over the age of 21 would want to be featured on a badly Photoshopped “Freedom 2 Twerk” club flier. Beyond that, I’d much rather let the work he did speak for itself than attempt to bring it up-to-date and invite a fight with no authoritative referee about whether, for example, the “content of character” refrain translates to “I hate affirmative action.”

When it comes to King’s actual life, too many Americans’ knowledge is limited to about two quotes, a sugarcoated biography and the misconstrued history of a single speech.

“My frustration is that King is frozen on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial at the March on Washington – because we have frozen his politics in time and sort of narrowly framed what his political beliefs were, reducing him to ‘I Have a Dream.’ His politics and historical evolution get lost,” says Jeffries.

In other words, there’s plenty to learn about what King was before we get to imagining what he would have been.

“It shouldn’t be about he would he do but about what do you do and believe?” says Jeffries.

If you think African-American popular culture is one big train wreck, by all means, make that case. But if things are truly that shameful, it shouldn’t be hard to do the work of explaining why, instead of outsourcing the side-eyeing to the curmudgeonly and judgmental King of that 2006 “Boondocks” episode.

When it comes to specific takes on particular issues, if you need a figure from the past – MLK or any other – to serve as an authority, it just might have to do less with that figure and more with your attempt to “look for a cover,” Jeffries speculates.

And King wouldn’t want that, now, would he?

Jen-Desmond-Harris is The Root’s senior staff writer.

© 2014, The Root

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • After plane horror, Europe must stand up to Putin

    Vladimir Putin has become a global menace.

  • Blue-state disgrace

    Immigration is a complex problem. So is the long-term question of how the United States should handle the influx of tens of thousands of children from Central America. Beyond the legal mandates, we owe them basic human decency. On the other hand, to say that they should all simply stay here for good begs big questions about encouraging more children to make this journey, and the rights of all the people abroad who are waiting their turn in line. Unless you believe in open borders, it’s all thorny. What seems right for an individual child can seem wrong systemwide.

  • Moon landing 45 years ago brought us together

    It was, after all, only a boot-crunching dust. You wouldn’t think the sight would affect so many or change so much.

Miami Herald

Join the

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category