IN MY OPINION

Chris Christie image was way overblown by the media

 
 
MCT
MCT
TBA / MCT

ggarvin@MiamiHerald.com

I owe Time magazine a big apology. Two months ago, when I read its fawning profile of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, which gushed over his fabulous propensity for “the kind of bipartisan dealmaking that no one seems to do anymore,” I thought it was insipid inside-the-Beltway drivel.

Now, however, I have to admit Time was insightful and even prescient. I can’t think of a single other governor in recent times (actually, ever) who has inflicted an apocalyptic four-day traffic jam on the citizens of one of his towns in the name of bipartisanship.

Emails among his flunkies reveal that the governor’s office had several lanes of a heavily traveled bridge in Fort Lee closed because the city’s mayor — a Democrat — had refused to cross party lines and endorse the Republican Christie.

“Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee,” wrote one. When the problems developed on cue, another noted that school buses were being trapped in the epic snarls and added a note of semi-contrition: “I feel badly about the kids. I guess.” To which another henchman, referring to Christie’s Democratic opponent, Barbara Buono, acidly replied: “They are the children of Buono voters.”

Well, not all of them. The daughter of a 91-year-old Fort Lee woman pronounced dead at a hospital after the ambulance that picked her up was trapped in the traffic jam says her mother was a Christie voter. But how much more hard-core can bipartisanship get than killing off your own supporters?

Time may have been the most fatuous in its embrace of Christie’s straight-shooting-bipartisan image — seriously, did no editor stab himself in the eye upon reading “the guy who loves his mother and gets it done”? — but it was by no means alone in the days before the governor went a bridge too far.

Barbara Walters, in her annual 10 Most Fascinating People television special, called Christie “frank forceful passionate and compassionate iconic.” Bubbled bedazzled CNN anchor Carol Costello: “Chris Christie is a rock star.” MSNBC political analyst Mark Halperin declared him “magical.”

Washington journalists are eternally devoted to the cause of bipartisanship, which they define as a Republican who breaks ranks to embrace liberal causes or Democratic candidates. (Democrats who do the reverse — like those who are edging away from Obamacare in the wake of its inept rollout — are simply cowards or turncoats.)

Bipartisanship may indeed have some merits when applied to an individual issue. No matter which party is in control of which set of offices, at some point, Congress has to pass a budget or approve a president’s judicial appointments, and refusing to budge becomes pointlessly obstreperous.

But any politician who tries to make bipartisanship the foundation of his or her appeal ought to be viewed with suspicion. That’s usually a convenient disguise for a complete lack of principles — or, more correctly, a complete devotion to a single principle, self-advancement.

That’s clearly the case with Christie, who was elected governor in 2009 not because he offered an agenda that appealed to voters but because Democratic incumbent Jon Corzine was mammothly unpopular.

Christie claims to be a fiscal conservative but is happy to increase spending as long somebody else foots the bill. He supported a federally funded $200-million-plus expansion of Medicare in New Jersey, but vetoed bills that would have made it permanent even if Washington cut its contribution.

He ripped Republicans in Congress for being tardy in passing emergency aid for Hurricane Sandy, then grabbed $25 million of the money to make tourism ads starring himself, just as he was facing reelection. He posed to Republican regulars as a Mitt Romney stalwart in 2012, then delivered fulsome, high-profile praise — including a televised hug — to President Obama during the stretch run.

Even Christie’s signature conservative issue, his bare-knuckle battle with New Jersey’s public-employee unions over benefits, has less to do with ideology than the simple fact that the state is so deeply in hock that there’s no other choice.

Though Christie is clearly no conservative and not much of a Republican, a lot of GOP leaders who see him as the best bet in a field of undistinguished potential presidential candidates for 2016 are launching a misguided attempt to defend him over the bridge-to-nowhere controversy. Small stuff, they say, that doesn’t matter and will be forgotten by election season.

They’re wrong on both counts. Unlike the Benghazi attacks or IRS hardball with tea party organizations, the petty vindictiveness of Christie’s traffic malice is something voters can easily understand and relate to themselves. And they will quite rightly wonder if a guy who would pull something like that ought to be trusted with the NSA, the FBI and the CIA.

Read more Glenn Garvin stories from the Miami Herald

  •  
 <span class="cutline_leadin">CHOCOLATE ATTACK: </span>North Korean defectors and South Korean activists release balloons carrying chocolate pies and cookies during a rally against the North.

    In My Opinion

    Glenn Garvin: A true tale of (choco) pie in the sky

    They call economics the dismal science. Actually, during my years as a foreign correspondent, I found it pretty lively, especially in countries with left-wing governments attempting to rewrite the laws of supply and demand.

  • In My Opinion

    Glenn Garvin: Supreme Court errs on Aereo decision

    When the Supreme Court effectively outlawed the online TV service Aereo last week, the first temptation was to dismiss the ruling as the confused ravings of a bunch of old people confounded by this newfangled Interweb stuff. Sort of like Larry King’s famous confession a few years ago that he’d never been online: “What, do you punch little buttons and things?”

  • In My Opinion

    The pitiful story of Newark’s school system

    Samuel Johnson called second marriages the triumph of hope over experience. When an Internet billionaire announces a plan to give away another $100 million to a second public school district after the first fritters it away without any results, I’d say its more like the triumph of delusion over the dead certainty that teachers’ unions and educational bureaucrats are a bottomless pit of greed.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category