Democrats, Republicans both wrong on Obamacare

 

Top Republicans privately recognize that repeatedly trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act is no longer a winning strategy. For Democrats, there is the risk that new problems will emerge within a program that still lacks strong leadership. They may also find that history doesn’t support their calculation that the health-care law will redound to their political advantage as more benefits kick in.

Republicans may face the biggest shift in public opinion. Some party strategists and leading politicians note that HealthCare.gov seems to have largely recovered from its dismal debut and that about 10 million Americans who didn’t have insurance will soon have it – including those who have signed up on the federal or state exchanges, or enrolled in Medicaid, as well as young adults who have been able to stay on their parents’ plans longer. Other benefits will also prove popular as the changes take effect.

A Republican leader said the public invariably resists measures that affect the stability of their health care; that was a big factor in Obamacare’s unpopularity. But as this year progresses, even with its unpopular parts, the new policy will normalize and its possible repeal will become destabilizing.

In 2014, a premium will be placed on Republican proposals to alter or offer alternatives to the health-care act. There are two major difficulties for the party, however. The first problem is that the right-wing base has minimal interest in alternatives to the law and loves the political red meat of repealing it. The second is that most of the Republican proposals offered so far would result in less coverage and provide little cost containment; moreover, there has been a significant slowing in the growth of health-care costs in recent years.

Democrats worry about more people losing their current coverage, a political liability that’s proving more troublesome than the website glitches. They’re also concerned that new bureaucratic hurdles will surface and that the law’s higher fees and taxes will put them on the defensive before the 2014 elections.

The calculation, by more than a few Democrats, that voters will reward them politically as the program becomes more popular is belied by previous experiences with major health-care policies. Medicare was enacted in 1965, and proved enormously popular, yet Democrats suffered losses in the next several elections. The Medicare prescription-drug benefit was enacted during George W. Bush’s administration and the president’s advisers thought it would be a big advantage for him in his re-election campaign. It wasn’t. And Romneycare, the Obama-like health-care proposal enacted in Massachusetts when Mitt Romney was governor, has lots of fans in the Bay State, but it hasn’t provided any political benefit for Republicans.

Albert R. Hunt is a Bloomberg View columnist.

© 2014, Bloomberg News.

Read more From Our Inbox stories from the Miami Herald

  • When journalists become the story

    In recent weeks, and in very different environments, journalists have found themselves in the unusual position of becoming the subject of news stories rather than the people telling them. First, my Washington Post colleague Wesley Lowery and the Huffington Post’s Ryan J. Reilly were arrested in a Ferguson, Mo., McDonald’s while covering protests against police brutality. Soon after, we learned that James Foley, a freelance journalist, was murdered by his Islamic State captors, an act that communicated the lethal tactics of that organization in the ugliest possible terms.

  • Censoring Islamic State on Twitter Is useless

    When a powerful denial-of-service attack brought down Sony’s PlayStation Network on Sunday, a group that claimed responsibility said it had acted on behalf of the Islamic State, the rapidly growing terrorist organization in the Middle East. Even if the “Lizard Squad” had nothing to do with it, the story was just another example of Islamic State’s devilish skill at promoting itself on social networks.

  • I demonstrated as an angry mob destroyed the U.S. embassy. I’m sorry.

    On Dec. 19, 1998, U.S. embassies across the Arab world felt the ire of residents outraged by U.S.-British airstrikes on Iraq. The most violent demonstrations occurred in Syria, where protesters stormed the U.S. and British embassies in Damascus. Protesters also destroyed the residence of U.S. Ambassador to Syria Ryan Crocker, who lodged vigorous objections with the Syrian government in response. I was among those protesters.

Miami Herald

Join the
Discussion

The Miami Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Miami Herald uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here.

Have a news tip? You can send it anonymously. Click here to send us your tip - or - consider joining the Public Insight Network and become a source for The Miami Herald and el Nuevo Herald.

Hide Comments

This affects comments on all stories.

Cancel OK

  • Marketplace

Today's Circulars

  • Quick Job Search

Enter Keyword(s) Enter City Select a State Select a Category